Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

All in a day's (illegal) work
Christian Science Monitor ^ | January 25, 2006 edition | Editorial

Posted on 01/24/2006 6:08:00 PM PST by Graybeard58

Herndon, Va. could be Anytown, USA. Day laborers, many of them illegal immigrants, often clogged a 7-Eleven parking lot, creating unsanitary conditions and disorder. After heated debate, the town last month opened a work center for the jobbers. Order now reigns, but the debate rages on as illegal-immigration opponents seek to shut the center.

Herndon's actions reflect a national phenomenon about day laborers: Every day, workers gather in about 500 US parking lots and main streets (and increasingly, work centers), hoping they'll be picked for construction or other jobs by drive-up employers, according to a study released this week by the University of California in Los Angeles.

Here's the crunch, though: Three-quarters of these workers are illegal immigrants, the study finds. As a result, they're often stiffed of pay or otherwise abused. These open markets for illegal workers are a visible reason why illegal immigration is such a widespread concern and such a polarizing one - though it need not be.

First, illegal immigration is so talked about that members of the US House of Representatives dared not recess last month until they'd passed a strict border-enforcement bill.

With day laborers, Americans see with their own eyes that illegal immigration is no longer limited to the border states or select big cities. It's out in the open, in the exurbs, North and South. Now at an all-time high of 11 million, illegal migrants have been allowed to flourish, undercutting minimum-wage laws and straining public services. The obvious deluge explains why citizen groups in places such as Herndon are reporting contractors who hire suspected illegals to authorities - and wrongly, why they sometimes harass day laborers.

Now, for the polarization. As the UCLA study shows, these people may be illegal, but they're also a grossly disadvantaged underclass, calling out for a humanitarian response. They're defended by a Latino political constituency increasingly sought after by both parties. In response to this political pressure, some cities have developed hands-off "sanctuary" policies concerning the arrest of illegals. The feds, too, are more focused on stopping crime committed by illegals than enforcing the law banning known hiring of them. In 1992, 1,063 businesses were fined for such hiring. In 2004, three were.

In the immigration debate, and specifically on the hot-button issue of day laborers, compassion and law enforcement can work together.

A country that has become addicted to the cheap labor of illegals has an obligation to respond in a kind way to a problem it tolerates and encourages. Work centers are an appropriate temporary solution that can turn chaos to order. And minimum-wage laws should apply to all.

But the bottom line is that the US is a country of laws. Illegal immigration is a large-scale abuse of the law, with social and economic costs. The fact that states considered more than 300 immigration bills last year shows the absolute failure of the federal government to enforce immigration laws.

America is built on the contribution of foreigners who settle here. But that contribution must be legal.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: aliens; daylaborcenter; daylaborers; herndon; iamanillegalwoeisme; illegalaliens; immigrantlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 01/24/2006 6:08:00 PM PST by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Itzlzha

ping


2 posted on 01/24/2006 6:13:27 PM PST by flashbunny (Are you annoying ME? Are you annoying ME? You must be annoying me, since there's no one else here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Every day, workers gather in about 500 US parking lots and main streets (and increasingly, work centers), hoping they'll be picked for construction or other jobs by drive-up employers

We need bounties.

3 posted on 01/24/2006 6:13:58 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
We need bounties.

WITH NO BAG LIMIT!

4 posted on 01/24/2006 6:15:11 PM PST by hillary's_fat_a**
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
We need bounties.

On the illegals or the people who hire them? Or both?

5 posted on 01/24/2006 6:24:23 PM PST by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hillary's_fat_a**

$100 per illegal bounty.....paid for by a $10,000 per illegal employee fine to the employer.


6 posted on 01/24/2006 6:24:30 PM PST by pilgrim in an unholy land
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
On the illegals or the people who hire them?

I was thinking the former but would happily include the latter.

7 posted on 01/24/2006 6:27:16 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Adi-freaking-os
8 posted on 01/24/2006 6:29:08 PM PST by doug from upland (NEW YORK TIMES -- traitorous b*st*rds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster

ping


9 posted on 01/24/2006 6:34:55 PM PST by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite; NRA2BFree; Happy2BMe; Spiff; Pelham; Das Outsider; moehoward; ...
Now, for the polarization. As the UCLA study shows, these people may be illegal, but they're also a grossly disadvantaged underclass, calling out for a humanitarian response. They're defended by a Latino political constituency increasingly sought after by both parties. In response to this political pressure, some cities have developed hands-off "sanctuary" policies concerning the arrest of illegals. The feds, too, are more focused on stopping crime committed by illegals than enforcing the law banning known hiring of them. In 1992, 1,063 businesses were fined for such hiring. In 2004, three were.

So much for those who discounted my argument that Illegal Infiltrators being exploited by Businesses is Slave Labor...

Also so much for the 14th Amendment, as "Equal Protection" is NOT being afforded me when State and Federal Gub'Mint can pick and choose which Laws to enforce, and afford a "Protected Class" status on Illegal Immigrants with such "Sanctuary" areas!!

10 posted on 01/24/2006 6:36:38 PM PST by Itzlzha ("The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Itzlzha

Ya know...


11 posted on 01/24/2006 6:38:49 PM PST by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
After heated debate, the town last month opened a work center for the jobbers.

Jobbers? I'll add that to my list of euphemisms.

As the UCLA study shows, these people may be illegal, but they're also a grossly disadvantaged underclass, calling out for a humanitarian response.

From one humanitarian to another, here's a tip for for the "jobbers". When you are breaking the law and dealing with others who are also breaking the law, you are liable to get screwed over.

12 posted on 01/24/2006 6:48:22 PM PST by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Itzlzha

Thx for the ping... argh... it is getting more and more pervasive. Next, ya'll will be sending them to school. Wait! We already do! :$


13 posted on 01/24/2006 6:48:34 PM PST by Jhohanna (Born Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Itzlzha
Also so much for the 14th Amendment, as "Equal Protection" is NOT being afforded me when State and Federal Gub'Mint can pick and choose which Laws to enforce, and afford a "Protected Class" status on Illegal Immigrants with such "Sanctuary" areas!!

Using the government reasoning, let's declare our homes as sanctuaries from all taxation.

14 posted on 01/24/2006 6:58:35 PM PST by afnamvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: afnamvet

I'll second that! LOL


15 posted on 01/24/2006 7:05:42 PM PST by tropical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DumpsterDiver

Hey DD - Did you hear about Rob Reiner's new "idea" about providing pre-school for every California kid? Can you imagine what it will cost us in taxes? It will be a baby sitting service for Mexicans, paid for by us, as usual...


16 posted on 01/24/2006 7:12:15 PM PST by janetgreen (Washington fiddles while America is invaded!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
As a result, they're often stiffed of pay or otherwise abused.

Is this supposed to draw my sympathies?

Y-A-W-N!!!

17 posted on 01/24/2006 7:17:34 PM PST by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen
Update: We are already babysitting Mexicans, about one-third of the total population of Mexico, right here in the U.S., babysitting them all. I think their goal is adoption, at least, to inherit after Americans keel over.
18 posted on 01/24/2006 7:30:18 PM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Fruitbat


19 posted on 01/24/2006 7:32:19 PM PST by devolve (<-- (-in a manner reminiscent of Senator Gasbag F. Kohnman-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: devolve

LOL


20 posted on 01/24/2006 7:33:34 PM PST by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson