I'm certain that we haven't, but I'm glad that we have now because there is that little thingy called the equal protection clause that I can point you to.
This how it usually goes Ben. You make some statement you know not to be true, get corrected, then sidestep to another subject. You never disappoint.
We HAVE discussed Tancredo's plan on at least one occasion. Here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1472967/posts?page=160#160
As far as "the equal protection clause", I'm afraid we will not agree again. If the 14th amendment were interpreted as it was intended to be, we would not have such a thing as anchor babies. Enlighten yourself here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1563956/posts?page=150#125