This how it usually goes Ben. You make some statement you know not to be true, get corrected, then sidestep to another subject. You never disappoint.
We HAVE discussed Tancredo's plan on at least one occasion. Here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1472967/posts?page=160#160
As far as "the equal protection clause", I'm afraid we will not agree again. If the 14th amendment were interpreted as it was intended to be, we would not have such a thing as anchor babies. Enlighten yourself here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1563956/posts?page=150#125
If you will take the time to go back and read my response in both instances, the response is the same.
Making compliance harder, more detrimental, more stupid is not the answer. It has to be made easier.
Do you want your guest worker reg to be one page long or 300 pages long? Do you want your IRS reg to be one page long or 300 pages long.
Now I know that you think that Tancredo has the bill right, but have you've ever wondered why Senators Vitter or Coburn didn't introduce Tanc's bill into the Senate. After all, they are former menbers of Tanc's immigration caucus.