Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/23/2006 11:19:56 AM PST by pookie18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: pookie18

*snickers* Mccain is sure leaps and bounds ahead of his competition.


2 posted on 01/23/2006 11:21:52 AM PST by SDGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18

McCain's #1 in something.


3 posted on 01/23/2006 11:22:18 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18

Rice for 2008!

Red6


4 posted on 01/23/2006 11:23:46 AM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18

Least Desired Nominee For 2008

2) Chuck Hagel (55.5) 1) John McCain (74.5)


ROFL!!!!


5 posted on 01/23/2006 11:24:42 AM PST by Soul Seeker (Mr. President: It is now time to turn over the money changers' tables.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18
1) Condoleeza Rice (65.5)

I find this very surprising and heartening.

6 posted on 01/23/2006 11:25:50 AM PST by Mike Darancette (Condimaniac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18

I'm surprised no one put Mike Pence in there.


7 posted on 01/23/2006 11:26:04 AM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18

More feel good news concerning McCain...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060123/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_campaign_finance

Supreme Court Sidesteps Campaign Finance By GINA HOLLAND, Associated Press Writer
2 hours, 50 minutes ago



WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court said Monday that a lower court should take a new look at a challenge to federal restrictions on political advertisements, delaying a major ruling on the constitutionality of ad limits until after this year's elections.

ADVERTISEMENT

Justices could have used the case, brought by an anti-abortion group, to spell out when so-called grass-roots ads are allowed at election time.

Without dealing with that issue, the court overturned a decision that barred Wisconsin Right to Life from broadcasting ads that mentioned a senator during his 2004 re-election campaign.

In an unsigned opinion, justices said that the Supreme Court's 2003 ruling upholding a federal campaign finance law left the door open for future challenges that the law, in practice, violated free-speech rights.

"This could be an important first step toward undermining (the 2003 ruling) without overruling it," said Richard Hasen, an election law expert at Loyola Law School.

The case now returns to a three-judge federal panel in Washington, although it could be back before the Supreme Court later this year.

"It is certainly our hope this can be dealt with promptly so that now, not only we will know, everyone will know what type of lobbying ads are permitted," said James Bopp Jr., the attorney for the Wisconsin group.

Wisconsin Right to Life had challenged the part of the 2002 campaign finance law that bans the use of corporate or union money for ads that identify federal candidates two months before a general election. The group's ads named Sen. Russ Feingold (news, bio, voting record), D-Wis., who was up for re-election, and the state's other senator.

The commercials urged people to call the senators and ask them to oppose Senate filibustering of President Bush's judicial selections. Feingold co-authored the campaign finance law with Sen. John McCain (news, bio, voting record), R-Ariz.

The appeal had given the Supreme Court its first opportunity to review the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law in practical use. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's retirement could leave the court split 4-4 on the law, because she was the deciding vote in the 2003 ruling.

O'Connor was on the bench Monday possibly for the last time. The court is taking a monthlong break.

New Chief Justice John Roberts announced the decision, which was not signed and was unanimous.

The case is Wisconsin Right to Life v. Federal Election Commission, 04-1581.


9 posted on 01/23/2006 11:29:20 AM PST by Soul Seeker (Mr. President: It is now time to turn over the money changers' tables.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18

Tommy FRANKS


10 posted on 01/23/2006 11:30:24 AM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18

I'm still hoping Tommy Franks runs with Condi as VP


12 posted on 01/23/2006 11:32:02 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18

So...the top choice for the GOP is pro-choice and never sought elective office, and continually swears that she is not running. She is followed by a pro abortion, pro gay, anti-gun northeastener.

If that's our frontrunners, then I hate to see the also-rans.


13 posted on 01/23/2006 11:32:06 AM PST by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18

If I'm reading this right, Rice and Guilliana are #1 and #2 most favored and McCain is #1 least favored. I certainly agree with the McCain score. No way on Condaleeza Rice. She's a pretty lady but she's an establishment tool and NO THREAT to islamofascists. No one's going to take her serious. I say no dames in the oval office.


16 posted on 01/23/2006 11:36:37 AM PST by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18
Condi's at the top, but she's not running.

Rudy is in second, but he's quite liberal, in spite of his popularity. His stances on abortion didn't matter when he was mayor of NYC, but they will when it's time to appoint another SCOTUS Justice.

George Allen is next in line.

18 posted on 01/23/2006 11:39:37 AM PST by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18
Or in a more readable form:

Most Desired Nominee For 2008

1) Condoleeza Rice (65.5)
2) Rudy Giuliani (58.0)
3) George Allen (42.0)
4) Newt Gingrich (32.0)
5) Dick Cheney (26.0)
6) Mitt Romney (24.5)
7) Tom Tancredo (19.5)
8) Jeb Bush (19.0)
9) Mark Sanford (13.5)
10) John McCain (13.0)
11) Tim Pawlenty (10.5)
11) Haley Barbour (10.5)
13) Bob Ehrlich (7.5)
14) Bill Frist (6.0)
15) George Pataki (5.5)
15) Mike Huckabee (5.5)
15) Sam Brownback (5.5)

Least Desired Nominee For 2008

14) Rick Santorum (6.5)
12) Tom Tancredo (7.5)
12) Tom DeLay (7.5)
11) Condoleeza Rice (8.5)
10) Tom Ridge (15.0)
9) Newt Gingrich (15.5)
8) Mitt Romney (16.5)
7) Rudy Giuliani (17.0)
6) Dick Cheney (20.5)
5) Jeb Bush (22.0)
4) George Pataki (33.0)
3) Bill Frist (43.5)
2) Chuck Hagel (55.5)
1) John McCain (74.5)

Why the author didn't do this, I don't know...

19 posted on 01/23/2006 11:42:05 AM PST by null and void ("Never place a period where God has placed a coma" --Gracie Allen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18

Several candidates showed up on both the best and worst lists. This could be a bloody primary season.


23 posted on 01/23/2006 11:43:22 AM PST by colorado tanker (I can't comment on things that might come before the Court, but I can tell you my Pinochle strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Least Desired Nominee For 2008 (7) Rudy Guiliani

Rudy has his inaugural ball gown picked out already, too. Rudy in drag is one of those sure-fire election losers---like Dukakis in the tank, and Kerry in the NASA suit with the condom on his head.

Course, Rudy might get the sexually confused vote (snicker). This is not photoshopped---Rudy really dressed like this.

38 posted on 01/23/2006 12:03:09 PM PST by Liz (You may not be interested in politics; doesn't mean politics isn't interested in you. Pericles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18
Here are the results if you subtract the negative numbers from the positive numbers:

1) Condoleeza Rice 57
2) George Allen 42
3) Rudy Giuliani 41
4) Newt Gingrich 16.5
5) Mark Sanford 13.5
6) Tom Tancredo 12
7) Tim Pawlenty 10.5
8) Haley Barbour 10.5
6) Mitt Romney 8
10) Bob Ehrlich 7.5
11) Dick Cheney 5.5
12) Mike Huckabee 5.5
13) Sam Brownback 5.5
14) Jeb Bush -3
15) George Pataki -27.5
16) Bill Frist -37.5
17) John McCain -61.5

40 posted on 01/23/2006 12:04:17 PM PST by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18

I don't understand how Giulani gets up there when he isn't even a conservative. I think there is some group denial about where he stands on the issues.


44 posted on 01/23/2006 12:09:20 PM PST by Mount Athos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18

It's good to see that Chuckie Hagel is getting some of the criticism he deserves, but he needs a lot more. Let's all pitch in.

Hagel would be a far worse president than Giuliani or even McPain, but he doesn't get nearly the amount of criticism from conservatives that Giuliani and McPain get. Read some of the stuff that Hagel's said. It's scary. Sometimes I think Chuckie Hagel is further left than that other Chuckie, Chuckie Schumer.

If it was McPain vs. Hillary in 2008, I would very reluctantly vote for McPain. If it were Hagel vs. Hillary, I'd vote third party.


53 posted on 01/23/2006 12:17:03 PM PST by JillValentine (To be compassionate to the cruel is to be cruel to the compassionate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18

George Allen in '08!


58 posted on 01/23/2006 12:22:28 PM PST by cowtowney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18
GayPatriot

Right of Center?

60 posted on 01/23/2006 12:28:30 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson