Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese map claims to back theory that China discovered America
AFP ^ | 1/17/06

Posted on 01/17/2006 5:00:33 PM PST by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: shroudie; Swordmaker; SkyPilot; Ditto; Alamo-Girl; Angelas; Bellflower; Buggman; GregoTX; ...
map is a geographers version of the Turin cloth depicting Christ ... a total fabrication.

Ping

21 posted on 01/17/2006 5:22:50 PM PST by presidio9 (Nolite id cogere, cape malleum majorem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I think the story goes like this. The Chinese came to North America, found nothing interesting and left. There was also a leadership strife in China at the time. The map was given or sold to the Europeans through existing trading channels. The implication is that Columbus knew there was land here before he set sail.

Here's a little bit of trivia. There is an ancient Chinese ship anchor found in Palos Verdes, California.


22 posted on 01/17/2006 5:26:24 PM PST by dmanLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Notice that Puerto Rico is rotated 90 degrees to the right. As Hapgood pointed out in "Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings" this has to do with a well-known variation in the way mariners of the Middle Ages noted orientation for navigation purposes.

I don't happen to have the details of his argument, but it was pretty persuasive. Of course, he was talking about the "Piri Reis" map owned by Christopher Columbus.

There's yet another theory that Admiral He undertook his voyages upon acquiring information of even more ancient vintage.

23 posted on 01/17/2006 5:27:43 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dmanLA

Personally, I think a lot of people knew land was there. Again, the Romans were here 2000 years ago. Perhaps Marco Polo told Kublia Khan about it.


24 posted on 01/17/2006 5:27:54 PM PST by presidio9 (Nolite id cogere, cape malleum majorem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: VOA
They are smart but have no imagination at all, it has been bred out of them after centuries of Strict rulers.
25 posted on 01/17/2006 5:29:50 PM PST by Roverman2K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: VOA

The Chinese discovered it, didn't know what to do with it.

(which is really weird, because all the Chinese I've worked with
are pretty danged smart.)

Smart isn't enough to overcome bureaucracy, which the Chinese also invented. It held them back, as it is holding us back now.


26 posted on 01/17/2006 5:30:24 PM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon Liberty, it is essential to examine principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
There's a very good argument that no one from the Old World made it to the New World from truly ancient times until about 800 AD when the bow and arrow suddenly appeared in the Americas.

Good candidates for the "culture bearers" who brought that instrument are the Vikings.

On the other hand, in truly ancient times there just about had to be cocaine dealers from Bolivia making it all the way to the Mediterranean!

27 posted on 01/17/2006 5:32:16 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
How do you know the Shroud is a "total fabrication?" Athiest scientists who have spent their careers studying it are not able to say that.

Do a 'Google' search; in the last couple of years it has been shown how the depiction of Christ on the 'Shroud of Turin' could have been fabricated some 5 or 6 hundred years ago.

28 posted on 01/17/2006 5:33:06 PM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

We have two seperate 1st century Roman shipwrecks in very different parts of South America that prove the Romans were here. What we don't know is if anyone ever returned to Europe.


29 posted on 01/17/2006 5:33:49 PM PST by presidio9 (Nolite id cogere, cape malleum majorem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Chinese map claims to back theory that China discovered America

Yeah, so?

30 posted on 01/17/2006 5:34:27 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Goodwin
Either Antarctica is on that map, or it's just the cartographers trick of drawing in a landmass for "balance". If it's not Antarctica, you might well imagine Admiral He having penetrated far to the West, around Africa, to make his discovery, and then, far to the East, across the Pacific, to discover the other side.

Otherwise you need to imagine exceedingly large Chinese ships navigating the Straits of Magellan.

31 posted on 01/17/2006 5:37:45 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: VOA
The story that the Chinese didn't know what to do with gunpowder is in error. They went straight from fireworks and flash powder to large rockets which carried explosive loads used in warfare.

The multi-stage rocket was developed much later by Schmidlapp in Germany or Austria.

It's noteworthy that the broad outlines of cannons were developed by the Turks, and that the Europeans undertook to improve the design substantially. This effort resulted in today's modern handguns (and everything else).

32 posted on 01/17/2006 5:39:59 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o

The Shroud of Turin has not, BTW, been demonstrated to be some sort of forgery. I think you are remembering the radio-carbon dating made of thread used to repair burns left in the shroud in the Middle Ages.


33 posted on 01/17/2006 5:41:32 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
There are undoubtedly all sorts of wrecks from the Eastern Atlantic that were blown all the way to the Americas. The question is about their crews? Did they make it.

I think the bow and arrow thing demonstrates there were no meaningful visits to the New World from the Old World until about 800 AD. Then all hell broke loose.

34 posted on 01/17/2006 5:45:09 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

This is BS, the map is a cheap knock-off and forged, the Chinese excel at this kind of thing!


35 posted on 01/17/2006 5:45:45 PM PST by Imperialist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

They are more full of shite' than a Christmas Turkey BUMP!


36 posted on 01/17/2006 5:45:47 PM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

This screams fraud to me. Even if Chinese mariners made it to the Pacific Coast of North America... this map shows the east coast of the Americas, too. How did the Chinese fleet uncover Antarctica and Australia? Why did the Chinese hide their knowledge of the Americas and Asia being separated by ocean when no one else in the world knew it until Vitus Bering? If this Chinese mariner did circumnavigate the world, he surely ran into other cultures - where are the stories from those cultures? A fleet of a 1,000 ships showing up in your local river would be enough to prompt generations of oral tradition. Where are all the artifacts left behind no doubt by sailors on a 1,000 ship fleet? The fleet brought home a giraffe to Beijing from Africa - why not a kangaroo, or a grizzly bear, or a narwhal? I say: PROBABLY FRAUD


37 posted on 01/17/2006 5:47:11 PM PST by redpoll (redpoll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I got a map around here that shows that I discovered China!!!


38 posted on 01/17/2006 5:49:51 PM PST by The Louiswu (The coward will not fight, the fool refuses to see necessity the scoundrel puts himself ahead of all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

"The map is dated to 1763 but is also clearly marked that it is a copy of a map made in 1418..."


I really don't see how that much detail could be in a map made in 1418, even if this guy's discovery was authentic. It's one thing to "discover America," but this guy also apparently discovered the Gulf of Mexico, Hudson Bay, the Ithsmus of Panama, Alaska, the St. Laurence Seaway, the Yukon, the Isle of Catalina, Hawaii, Australia, Europe, the Berring Strait, Africa, the Persian Gulf, the Mediteranian, the Black Sea, Japan, Greenland, Bermuda, India, Antactica, the Phillipines, etc....

And oddly enough, his depiction of his homeland, China, doesn't seem to be as accurate as his depiction of a lot of other places.


39 posted on 01/17/2006 6:00:56 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Say! I just realized... It's not a map. I see a picture of Jesus!


40 posted on 01/17/2006 6:04:16 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson