Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mewzilla

Fine - but the cameras rarely get a picture of the driver, and you get a ticket and fine assessed, plus a notation on your record without a trial.

I could put fake tags with your number on a car that looks like yours, run every monitored red light in the city, and you'd get a bunch of tickets that you'd have to pay - for offenses you didn't commit. Or you piss off your spouse when you're going through a divorce, and she runs all the lights in town in 'your' car. This has actually been done in at least two cases I can think of. You think that might be a problem? Something about "so much for the right of trial by jury"?


17 posted on 01/15/2006 10:53:29 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Spktyr

If I understand correctly, all the owner of the car has to do is reveal who was behind the wheel if it wasn't the owner of the car. The driver of the car at the time of the infraction then gets the ticket. If I'm wrong, please correct me.


22 posted on 01/15/2006 10:56:09 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Spktyr
Fine - but the cameras rarely get a picture of the driver,

Here in California, they won't even bother mailing the ticket if they can't ID the driver in the pic.

81 posted on 01/15/2006 12:31:50 PM PST by ErnBatavia (I post in slang..live with it or ignore it - reader's choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson