Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Looting Charges Dropped Against Great-Grandmother
http://articles.news.aol.com ^ | 1 13 06 | aolnews

Posted on 01/13/2006 11:48:33 AM PST by freepatriot32

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: napscoordinator

WTH does that prove?!


21 posted on 01/13/2006 12:59:39 PM PST by Sloth (Macromelancholia -- The wistful desire to play those Flash games in advertising banners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

It means she is receiving lawyers from the federal government.


22 posted on 01/13/2006 1:01:28 PM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
volunteer lawyers from the Federal Emergency Management Agency

So?

I knew attorneys who did volunteer work with FEMA after Katrina and Rita, it was just a centralized resource for people who happened to be displaced. It was part of FEMA services available to the evacuees.

So how did the FEMA laywer help her live on the system for years?

23 posted on 01/13/2006 1:02:13 PM PST by Republican Party Reptile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cyborg

Absolutely not.


24 posted on 01/13/2006 1:03:10 PM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
It means she is receiving lawyers from the federal government.

What part of volunteer do you not understand? Volunteer indicates that they are donating their time to help people. Not that they are being payed by the government

25 posted on 01/13/2006 1:04:23 PM PST by ghostcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

so anyone who received assistence from FEMA in anyway must have been living on the government dole for years?


26 posted on 01/13/2006 1:04:26 PM PST by Republican Party Reptile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

This women has been living on the system for years because she had these kids.

** HOW DO YOU KNOW SHE'S BEEN IN THE SYSTEM FOR YEARS. Answer the question.


27 posted on 01/13/2006 1:04:26 PM PST by cyborg (I just love that man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
The looting charge alleged she took $63.50 in goods from a deli. Her bail had been set at $50,000

Good heavens, man. Are there any judges left in Louisiana with some sense?

28 posted on 01/13/2006 1:06:36 PM PST by TChris ("Unless you act, you're going to lose your world." - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyborg; napscoordinator

He's not going to answer your question in any real way. He cannot. I did a Google search on this woman, and could not find anything out about her, other than the fact that she has diabetes, an 80-year-old husband, a daughter and grandchildren.

It's impossible to infer from any existing information that she has EVER been on welfare. It was just a stupid remark.


29 posted on 01/13/2006 1:06:51 PM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

Not holding my breath either way...you have a good weekend MM.


30 posted on 01/13/2006 1:08:23 PM PST by cyborg (I just love that man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: cyborg; napscoordinator

I wonder which NAPS our correspondent is a coordinator for? There are so many.

I'm voting for the National Association for Premenstrual Syndrome.


31 posted on 01/13/2006 1:10:39 PM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: cyborg

I'll have the best one I can. You too.


32 posted on 01/13/2006 1:11:10 PM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


33 posted on 01/13/2006 1:11:58 PM PST by evets (God bless president Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

That is a funny one.


34 posted on 01/13/2006 1:11:59 PM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
It means she is receiving lawyers from the federal government.

So what about the private attorney that was also engaged? that's living on the system for years too?

35 posted on 01/13/2006 1:13:23 PM PST by Republican Party Reptile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

Stupid remark...

You have been here long enough to know that I don't say stupid remarks more than 99 percent of the time. Ok I did a google search and did not find anything either so I will retract my previous statement with apologies to my fellow freepers.


36 posted on 01/13/2006 1:17:26 PM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

"Ok I did a google search and did not find anything either so I will retract my previous statement with apologies to my fellow freepers."

Good job!


37 posted on 01/13/2006 1:18:26 PM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: windcliff

ping


38 posted on 01/13/2006 1:23:04 PM PST by stylecouncilor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ghostcat; napscoordinator; cyborg
To get intervention from volunteer lawyers is not the same as welfare.

Of course not. When I first started practicing, I frequently volunteered my services either for free or for a small stipend through various programs to provide legal assistance.

Those clients were not on welfare, but were elderly, single moms, or the sick. Not on welfare, but often unable to afford a full-priced lawyer.

Also, I'm sure I've read of people who've had volunteer representation by lawyers associated w/conservative causes. The lawyers volunteer because the client or the cause appeals to them, not because of the client's financial status.

39 posted on 01/13/2006 1:24:53 PM PST by radiohead (Hey Kerry, I'm still here; still hating your lying, stinking guts, you coward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

It's interesting. I just saw the movie Cinderella Man, the biography of James J. Braddock. The movie is set in the Great Depression. In one scene, Braddock's son stole a sausage from the butcher. Braddock returns the boy and the sausage.

His kid confesses that his friends were sent away because there was no food and he was afraid he was going away, so he stole. Braddock looks his kid in the eye and says, "We don't steal. We never steal."


40 posted on 01/13/2006 1:26:20 PM PST by sully777 (Blame Canada!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson