Posted on 12/26/2005 7:57:45 AM PST by alienken
I guess it's not top secret anymore. Interesting how eager the MSM is to expose our national security measures as opposed to reporting the positive achievements in the war on terror.
I personally believe the MSM should be subject to the same penalties for compromising top secret information as is for example an individual contractor or DOD employee...loss of clearance and prison. Somehow the MSM seems to be granted immunity from prosecution. I would like to see this changed retroactively all the way back to the pentagon papers.
"Did you see the BBC's Dirty War...?"No,is it a documentary?Worth watching?
Americans are an easy target. No other prey goes to such lengths to assist in their own ends.
They should be allowed to nuke us first before we can get a search warrant. Then we can wring our hands about what we did to them to make them hate us.
Apparently Bush has been doing a much more thorough and competant job of counterterrorism than we all had realized. It would be interesting to know how many suitcase nukes they've already intercepted. I don't suppose the NYT would care to report on that.
Good point.I believe the msm are getting increasingly desperate.Not too long ago they made more effort to conceal their bias.Now it's an "in your face" posture.Net result-alienating more readers.Give em enough rope......:)
The MSM can't leak all this info without the willing help of Democrats with security clearances. Somebody somewhere is talking...too much.
no a fictionalized account if adirty bomb was set off in London... it's quite good...
"Somebody somewhere is talking too much."I agree 100%,but exposing the culprit(s)and prosecuting will be very difficult if not impossible.I feel that behavior(leaking security info)is treasonous.
personally I wouldn't put this past our favorite RINO.
Just pretend it's during WWII, and change the word "Muslim" for "Nazi", because during WWII there were plenty of them here. "Bush spying on nazi's without warrants." Who would have complained back then?
Good! Now Tom Kean can crawl back under his rock an stop saying the President is doing nothing to prevent a terror attack.
I'll look for it.History Channel by any chance?
At which point the left, will switch from accusing the Administration of wrongdoing, to accusing the White House of engineering the leaks to bolster the President's approval rating.
That will leave the NYT and whoever the real leakers are scratching their heads, but it'll happen.
It's a good start, but there must be thousands more of such sites that need secret monitoring as well. Let's hope the gov doesn't rest on its laurels here.
I agree, there has to be a blabber in a high place. It's not hard to pick out the side that gets the most out of a smear against the Bush Administration. Fortunately the left seems unaware of the law of unintended consequences. It's always best to deal above the table. The dems can't win on ideas so they work underhanded deals in the dark with the willing MSM.
"Next cops will need warrants to look at muslims."
Look at 'em in or out of the Burka? If out, has the Police Union demanded extra barf bags and extra pay for service above and beyond (far beyond) the call of duty.
I guess the next time the Libs/MSM try to bring up that lame bogus PlameGame leak by Rove and Liddy, we can counter them with the fact they they disclosed sensitive national security infro of those terrorist prisons, the N.S.A. wire taps, and the government monitoring of the muslims and their places of worship.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.