"I think it's a GREAT Idea! Now about that Plasma Rifle in the 30 mW range..."
Posted on 12/25/2005 5:28:12 PM PST by elkfersupper
KANSAS CITY, Mo. - Missouri transportation officials approved a controversial contract Friday that will allow a private corporation to track signals from motorists' cell phones to map traffic snarls and highway congestion on major roads throughout the state.
As early as next week, that company, the National Engineering Technology Corp. (NET), will start monitoring thousands of cell phones in Kansas City and St. Louis, using their movements to test how to relay traffic conditions to the public in real time.
While officials say the program will make Missouri a national leader in "intelligent" traffic management, privacy advocates are concerned that getting more frequent travel time updates on road signs and Web sites may come at a price.
"This is a leap forward in our nation," said Missouri Department of Transportation Director Pete Rahn, minutes before the Highways and Transportation Commission's unanimous vote to authorize the contract. "No other department of transportation will be able to keep the users of their system as well informed."
The program charts drivers' relative speed by measuring the time between the intermittent signals cell phones send to towers along a stretch of road. Then, that information - stripped of the personal identification and serial numbers that identify the cell phone's owner - is overlaid with highway maps to determine where the phones are and how fast they are moving.
In six months, transportation officials say, Missouri motorists will be able to calculate their commute times by viewing such maps on the government's Web sites. Distilled versions of the information will also be displayed on electronic road signs along major highways, they said.
Cell phone monitoring already is being used by transportation officials in Baltimore, though not yet to relay traffic conditions to the public. Similar projects are getting under way in Norfolk, Va., and a stretch of Interstate 75 between Atlanta and Macon, Ga.
But monitoring phone signals along Missouri's 5,500 miles of major roads, many of which run through rural areas where cell phone coverage is spotty, makes for an additional challenge. On Friday, state officials had not determined which cell phone companies would provide information for the program.
That raised eyebrows at the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC).
"Consumers should have the right to opt into this public service," said Lillie Coney, associate director of Washington, D.C.-based EPIC. "Missouri may be creating a base for a new industry on the shoulders of the taxpayers."
Don Hillis, the director of system management for the Department of Transportation, said the state explored other options to provide the traffic flow information that motorists and logistics planners now expect and decided that wireless data collection was the cheapest way to go.
"We'll be able to give our drivers traffic information throughout their trips," said Hillis, who has overseen the project since its inception. "That said, we recognize the importance of the privacy issue, and we wouldn't do business with any company that would take any steps in the future to infringe on those rights." Hillis said regional planning commissions like the Mid-America Regional Council and the East-West Gateway Council of Governments will also have free access to the data to tackle congestion problems.
And as wireless technology evolves, Missouri officials believe there may be so much interest from users outside the government - such as trucking companies, satellite radio, mobile phones and GPS devices - that their investment could pay for itself.
Under the terms of the $6.2 million, two-year contract, NET will wholly own the information and is free to sell it to outside vendors that could profit from offering just-in-time travel updates. The government has no authority to monitor where the information ends up, but Hillis said that after two years, the state may enter a revenue-sharing agreement with NET.
"If you travel on a certain route every day, we'll eventually be able to give you alerts to see if an instance would keep you from getting to work on time," said Steven McDonald, a senior project manager for NET. "This has a lot of potential."
"I think it's a GREAT Idea! Now about that Plasma Rifle in the 30 mW range..."
or here's another idea...1984 is finally here!
Dig this:
The same people that wrote "1984", "bigbrother" and "yourpapersplease" on the keyword list, are the same that were "outraged" the Patriot Act wasn't permanently extended.
So... what is it???
I have a company pager and a personal cell phone.
I usually leave my cell phone off. My wife calls me on the pager and I turn on the cell phone and return her call.
BTW, the company doesn't have my cell number.
I'm turning my cell phone off, and removing the battery.<<<
Didnt u know...Knowingly trying to defraud a State agency is punishiable by law!
Is anyone ever really helped by listening to traffic reports?
Traffic is heavy and slow in every major city in the U.S., to and from work. So what's the use in all these ridiculous helicopters and airplanes buzzing overhead reporting the same thing every day? Big city traffic reports are as predictable as forcasting the weather in southern Arizona. "Today is going to be hot and dry, for a ten day forecast refer to today's weather report".
And the "it'll reduce insurance rates" crowd. {;o)
Those people were all me. And your point is?
"I still like a steaming pile of dogsqueeze better than this latest example of big-brotherism."
LOL!
For now, that is. Later, the government will claim that they absolutely need this information for, well, take your pick of reasons.
>>>I don't like this... not even a little bit.<<<
hate to break it to you - but logging on to check your e-mail generates more personal, traceable information that could be data mined than these traffic sensors.
The government always abuses everything, eventually!
You have got to stop spreading this truth man! It gets in the way of a good delusion... :)
OK.
Can you give us your position on privacy intrusion???
Today, when the government demands such data, they need a warrant unless certain conditions are met (like being in a terror cell).
They cannot demand cell ownership data from a carrier without a warrant, which is why the data is stripped to use it for counting cars on the highway.
Your phone constantly broadcasts it serial and other data, that's how cells connect and bills are sent, and how bootleggers steal your phone ID and load it into another cell, so you get the bill when the stolen phone is used.
This sounds like grounds for a class action lawsuit against this company
He he he...sometimes I take the other tack and deliberately spread panic! Just depends on my mood at the time.
Don't like it, generally won't put up with it.
If only people cared enough to actually do something like that (don't hold your breath).
Safety at all costs, don't you know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.