Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shadow Warriors... Mugniyah, the Killer of Navy Diver Stethem & How Clinton Let Him Go
CBS News ^ | May 1, 2002

Posted on 12/20/2005 2:13:55 PM PST by cgk

Shadow Warriors

May 1, 2002
(CBS) In the Persian Gulf, in late July 1996, American warships, a full complement of military hardware, and nearly 4,000 Marines, sailors and SEALs, were praying they could pull off the mission of their lives. They had been assigned to grab the man, who before September 11th, had killed more Americans than any other terrorist.

His name is Imad Mugniyah, and U.S. intelligence believed they had tracked him to the waters of the Persian Gulf, aboard a merchant ship, the Ibn Tufail.


Marine commander John Garrett helped plan this top-secret mission to take down the ship, and take Mugniyah into custody. This is the first time he has ever talked about it publicly. In fact, no one involved has ever talked about it, until now. Dan Rather reports.

“If we’re going to take down a ship, as in this case, you would like to have some sort of scare factor, a fly-over, low down, by jets,” he says. “Maybe even a strafing run or something off to the side. Simultaneously accompanied by a boarding of the vessel from the air which could be helicopters hovering and then fast-roping down to a spot that’s been picked on the deck.”

“Simultaneous to that, ideally you have a surface up attack from boats or craft in the water to go up the side of the ship.”

“So it’s the element of surprise, of combined arms, of massing everything that you have in a sequential or phased manner, to try to get the advantage and maintain it.”

Garrett says that all of this was in place.

One month earlier, 19 Americans had been killed in the bombing of the Khobar Towers Air Force barracks in Saudi Arabia. The suspected mastermind? Imad Mugniyah. When intelligence indicated he might be aboard the Ibn Tufail, a massive operation was mounted almost overnight.

Why would the U.S. send an armada for this one man?


“He is the most dangerous terrorist we’ve ever faced. He’s a pathological murderer,” says longtime CIA agent Bob Baer, who has chased Mugniyah for years. “Mugniyah is probably the most intelligent, most capable operative we’ve ever run across, including the KGB or anybody else. He enters by one door, exits by another, changes his cars daily, never makes appointments on a telephone, never is predictable. He only uses people that are related to him that he can trust. He doesn’t just recruit people. He is the master terrorist, the grail that we have been after since 1983.”

That’s when Mugniyah began his bloody career. He is accused of planning the bombing of the Beirut Marine barracks, murdering 241 Americans. He is the prime suspect in two bombings of America’s embassy in Beirut. Then in 1985, Mugniyah was identified as the man behind the brutal hijacking of a jet bound for Rome. Among the passengers was American Navy diver Robert Stethem. Mugniyah and his men beat Stethem for hours, then shot him and dumped his body onto the tarmac.

For two decades, Mugniyah has been so elusive that even capturing his image is difficult. Before the mission, SEAL platoon commander Tom Short was handed one of the few photos to help identify Mugniyah when he and his team were ordered to take over the Ibn Tufail. It was, he says, a very important mission.

“This guy was responsible for the deaths of 250 Marines, maybe more. That made you want to get him. But you know, not only what happened in the past, but what was gonna happen in the future, if we didn’t get him,” says Short. Every man on the mission was a volunteer, he says.

The plan came together quickly. U.S. Navy forces and marines were on routine duty in the Gulf. When without warning, they were scrambled for the top-secret operation.

The opportunity unfolded on July 23, when word came that Mugniyah was aboard the Ibn Tufail, which was docked in Doha, unaware that four American warships were stalking it.

Beginning in Bahrain, they sailed around the Peninsula of Qatar, and shadowed the ship as it moved along the Persian Gulf Coast. Ship logs show the Americans practiced their takedown tactics, and pored over intelligence reports.

“I’d never seen the kind of intelligence we had during this mission. I mean, in less than 48 hours,” says Short. “We had blueprints to the ship, the layout of the ship, pictures of the ship. Who was the crew, what they were carrying, what was their schedule. I mean it was just amazing to me the amount of intelligence that we had.”

“Every minute counts. Time is of the essence. Every minute’s golden. And so for 24 hours, we just planned around the clock,” says Garrett.



Bill McSwain was a Marine sniper. “I had four sniper teams on the ship with me, arranged from bow to stern in different positions. And in addition, because this was such a critical mission, we actually put snipers in helicopters.”

By nightfall of July 24, the Americans knew they were just hours away from taking down their target.

“We almost felt like we were dogs on a leash ready to go,” says McSwain.

There was nothing left to do but pull the trigger on the plan. In place, ready to attack, were 60 SEALs assigned to board the ship in secret. Dozens of Marine commandos, and hundreds of others were ready to search the ship from stem to stern.

Then with one word from Washington, all the planning, all the adrenaline, and all the hope… for thousands of American sailors and Marines, came crashing down.

The mission was called off.

Says Short: “I was just stunned. I mean disbelief. I mean it had been almost 48 hours at that point. And none of us had slept, and at the end of that, they tell you that it’s off, not standby, not be prepared, to just forget about it.”

“The explanation that I recall was they couldn’t verify that the target was still on board the vessel,” says Garrett. Garrett believed that.


For some of the men, that explanation wasn’t enough. For years, they blamed President Clinton for not going through with the mission.

“This is a man who President Clinton authorized numerous operations to get. This is not the only one we tried to do. And since we’re still trying to get him. I think its better not to get into too many details,” says Nancy Soderberg, who was President Clinton’s deputy assistant to the president for national security affairs.

“It was just simply that when the final go- no-go decision comes you need to make sure that the information is there to justify moving. And in this case, unfortunately, it was not. No one wants to conduct an operation that you know in advance is going to be a failure if the target’s not in your cross hairs. In this case, I think what it demonstrates is the commitment of President Clinton to do everything possible to get Mugniyah.”

If there was even a remote possibility that Mugniyah was on that vessel “President Clinton would have gone. No question about it,” she says.

But for the men who wanted to catch Mugniyah, standing down was the most difficult order to carry out.

Garrett said it was very important to the Marines. “I think it was critically important. I think this could have been one of those life-changing events that had it been successful, would have been, certainly for me, would have eclipsed anything that I had done in my career before, including Desert Storm.”

Bill McSwain read us the entry he had made in his diary the night the operation was called off.

“We were so close we could taste it,” he wrote. “Maybe we’ll get another shot at this guy, but probably not. I think I just missed the biggest chance I’ll ever get. Why couldn’t it have turned out differently?”

What would it have meant the last few years if Mugniyah had been out of commission?”


“I think you could go a long way toward unraveling or even preventing a September 11th, by getting a person like this,” says Baer.

Says Short: “9-11 happens. And I remember walking into the kitchen that morning, turning on the TV, and staring at that plane, flying into the World Trade Center. And at that instant, i thought ‘Is this guy involved? Did he have a hand in the planning? What would have happened if we had gotten him?’”



TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; clinton; clintonlegacy; flight847; germany; imadmugniyah; mugniyah; robertdeanstethem; stethem; usn; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
This is an older article from 2002 about the terrorist mastermind, Imad Fayez Mugniyah, of the TWA Flight 847 hijacking and murder of US Navy Diver Robert Dean Stethem.

Stethem is in the news today after one of his killers, Mohammed Ali Hamadi, was reported released by Germany.

Still at large, Mugniyah is also wanted for the murder of 241 Marines at the Beirut barracks bombing in 1984, the bombings of 2 American embassies in Beirut.

FBI's picture of Imad Fayez Mugniyah.

Alleged to be the most recent picture of Mugniyah, who is frequently referred to as Bin Laden's Teacher and Mentor in terrorism studies and articles.



Have you Thanked a Soldier today?
Thank a Soldier Week is December 19th to December 25th!

1 posted on 12/20/2005 2:13:58 PM PST by cgk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cgk

From now on we just wack the asshol#s in the assault. No prisoners.


2 posted on 12/20/2005 2:17:12 PM PST by MNJohnnie (We do not create terrorism by fighting the terrorists. We invite terrorism by ignoring them.--GWBush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk
Almost nothing short of overt treason would surprise me(any more). This hominid ( I can not use the term man) would sell his mother out to gain a few political points. My brother in - law was an active duty Marine during that administration. He and all of his buddies could not/can not stand the clintoon's.
Just Damn!
3 posted on 12/20/2005 2:20:06 PM PST by aliquando (A Scout is T, L, H, F, C, K, O, C, T, B, C, and R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

CNN's October 10, 2001 article noting that:

The recent terrorist attacks have intensified the decades-old search for Hezbollah founder Imad Mugniyah, linked to several anti-Western bombings and hijackings in the 1980s. Some intelligence sources suspect Mugniyah played a role in the hijackings of four U.S. airliners last month.

Full story: U.S. renews bid to catch Beirut bombing suspect

The only things known for sure about Mugniyah are his fingerprints, literally and figuratively --fingerprints that some intelligence sources see on the September 11 attacks themselves.

Mugniyah
The FBI released this photo of Mugniyah -- believed to date from the mid-1980s -- on Wednesday.  

Those who believe there may be a link between Mugniyah and the attacks on New York and Washington point to the evidence of Ali Mohamed, a former U.S. Special Forces sergeant who admitted to involvement in the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in Tanzania and Kenya.

In court documents, Mohamed swore, "I arranged a meeting in Sudan between Mugniyah, Hezbollah's chief, and bin Laden. Hezbollah provided explosives training for al Qaeda and al-Jihad" -- the Egyptian Islamic extremist group believed responsible for the 1981 assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat.

4 posted on 12/20/2005 2:21:57 PM PST by cgk (I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk
President Clinton would have gone. No question about itYeah, just like he got OBL. Just like the Cole. Just like...
5 posted on 12/20/2005 2:22:48 PM PST by mtbopfuyn (Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk

Would it be illegal to offer a reward for his head in a bag?


6 posted on 12/20/2005 2:23:06 PM PST by thoughtomator (Congrats Iraq!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
There were several other major Ops called off during the 90's at the very last stages.

Inexcusable.

7 posted on 12/20/2005 2:25:30 PM PST by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cgk
Too bad Monica or another scandal wasn't about to hit the news. If there had, the missiles and self congratulatory press conferences, NYT editorials, et al would have buried the bad news. Oh, and John McCain would have supported Bent Willy.
8 posted on 12/20/2005 2:28:02 PM PST by Jacquerie (Democrats soil institutions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk

Once again, another case of Bill Clinton not wanting to risk his standing in the polls to do something slightly risky for US national security. This is the exact same reason Clinton let Bin Laden get away up to 12 times according to two books published since 9-11, "Why America Slept" by liberal Gerald Posner and "Losing Bin Laden" by Richard Mintier. Posner, a two time Clinton voter and former New York Times writer, said after researching his book that even if he could, he would never vote for Clinton again and wouldn't have before if he knew what he now knows about Clinton's failures to take on terrorism and Al Qaeda on his watch.

In Posner's book, he even details how the Sudan offered up Bin Laden to us on a silver platter. When Sudan expelled Bin Laden in 1996 to Afghanistan, the Sudanese wanting to mend fences with the US offered to give the US the flight path of the Sudanese Air Force C-130 carrying Bin Laden and 150 top Al Qaeda leaders out of Sudan so we could force it to land and arrest the Al Qaeda thugs on board. Clinton said NO!!! Then the Sudanese offered to LAND THE PLANE IN QATAR for refueling where US commandos could take the plane and arrest Al Qaeda's leaders. STILL CLINTON SAID NO, "Allow the plane to proceed to Afghanistan." That incompetent, do-nothing, felonious boob Clinton LET PASS BY AN OPPORTUNITY TO DECAPITATE AL QAEDA!!! There would have been no 9-11 had Al Qaeda's top leaders been arrested at that time. But Clinton claimed "Not enough evidence." Spare me. The evidence was plentiful that Bin Laden and Al Qaeda had attacked the US and were planning more.

This sounds like the exact same excuse Clinton used to not raid this ship: "We're not positive he's on board." Well raid the damned thing anyway then you'll know for sure one way or another!!! This is the difference between having REAL MEN running US national security like Reagan or W. Bush as versus a politicized scared little rat like Clinton who was deathly afraid of risking political capital on military defense efforts, his most clear imperative in his role as CiC.

According to insiders, including the guy who carried the nuclear football for Clinton who wrote a book about his experiences as Clinton's chief defense aid and also according to Dick Morris, Clinton was afraid as a deer of using the US military abroad and suffering casualties for fear it would diminish his public standing. It was symptomatic of the "all about me presidency" that was the Clinton administration.


9 posted on 12/20/2005 2:29:55 PM PST by MikeA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aliquando
There was a book by X42's man who carried the football.

He reports that slick willie pulled the plug at the last minute for a raid to get OBL. Slick too busy on the golf course, if I remember correctly.

10 posted on 12/20/2005 2:31:16 PM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cgk

5 will get you 10 that the mission was scrubbed *not* because Mugniyah wasn't confirmed aboard, but rather was scrubbed because a certain North Korean *was* on board.

Just a guess, mind you...

11 posted on 12/20/2005 2:37:13 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeA
It goes without saying, that being near Clinton could still be hazardous to your health.
12 posted on 12/20/2005 2:38:15 PM PST by Thebaddog (K9 4ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cgk

NAVY DIVER ROBERT STETHEM PING


13 posted on 12/20/2005 2:41:56 PM PST by rlmorel ("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk
The treasonous Clintoons were worried about threats closer to home:

They took care of those threats quickly.

14 posted on 12/20/2005 2:46:50 PM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk
  1. Inhalt
  2. Navigation
  3. Weitere Inhalte
  4. Metanavigation
  5. Suche
  6. Choose form 30 Languages


 

Germany | 20.12.2005

Germany Releases Hezbollah Hijacker Wanted by US

Germany has quietly released a jailed Hezbollah member wanted by the US for killing an American Navy diver. The timing -- just days after the freeing of a German hostage in Iraq -- has raised uncomfortable questions.

Apparently ignoring Washington's extradition request for  Mohammed Ali Hamadi, German authorities have secretly  released the Lebanese Hezbollah member who was serving a life sentence in the country for the hijacking of a TWA jet and for the murder of a US navy diver.

German prosecutors confirmed the release of Mohammed Ali Hamadi, now in his late 30s, to the Associated Press and said he was flown back to Lebanon last week.

Hamadi was convicted in 1989 by a German court of killing US Navy diver Robert Dean Stethem during the 1985 hijacking of a TWA flight diverted to Beirut. He was sentenced to life without parole. His sentence is one Germany reserves for the most serious and cruel crimes. It is difficult but not impossible to release someone who receives such a sentence after 15 years. Hamadi served 19 years of his sentence.

Hamadi's other brother, Abbas Ali, was sentenced to 13 years in prison for plotting the kidnapping of two Germans in Lebanon in the hope of forcing the release of his brother. He was released from jail after serving his term.

A tradeoff between Hamadi and Osthoff?

Hamadi, now in his late 30s, was captured in 1987. German officials had tried unsuccessfully in the late 1980s to use him as a bargaining chip to free German hostages held in Lebanon.

Susanne Osthoff was released after three weeks in captivity in IraqBildunterschrift: Großansicht des Bildes mit der Bildunterschrift:  Susanne Osthoff was released after three weeks in captivity in IraqSome believe they were finally successful as Hamadi's release occurred shortly before German hostage Susanne Osthoff was freed in Iraq. The archaeologist was taken on Nov. 25 and was said by German authorities on Sunday to be in safe custody.

The German Foreign Ministry however has denied any link between the Hamadi and Osthoff releases. "There is no connection between these two cases," Foreign Ministry spokesman Martin Jäger told Reuters.

But a Lebanese source told Reuters that a senior German intelligence officer visited Damascus early this month but did not disclose the purpose of the trip. Syria is a key backer of Hezbollah and Hamadi's brother, Abdul-Hadi, was a senior security official of the group.

US disappointed by Hamadi release

Meanwhile, the release has disappointed Washington where  US prosecutors had indicted Hamadi for the murder of 23-year-old US Navy diver Robert Dean Stethem, one of the passengers on board while the TWA plane was in Beirut. The US had requested extradition if he was released.  

"We are disappointed by the fact that he was released before the end of his sentence," State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said, referring to Mohammed Ali Hamadi. "The US will make every effort to see that this individual faces justice in the US."

Diplomats also said privately that the affair could further complicate touchy relations between the two allies that had warmed considerably since a dispute over the Iraq war.  

 

DW staff (jb)

Send us an e-mailSendPrint

More on the topic




15 posted on 12/20/2005 2:49:23 PM PST by Leisler (HEY LEFTY! FREED TIBET YET?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk

When 911 happened the toon was running around like a fool knowing he'd caused 911 to happen.


16 posted on 12/20/2005 2:55:36 PM PST by shield (The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instructions.Pr 1:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk
This is a man who President Clinton authorized numerous operations to get. This is not the only one we tried to do. And since we’re still trying to get him. I think its better not to get into too many details."

This is what happens when lawyers try to run a country: repeated failures, lame excuses.

17 posted on 12/20/2005 3:02:50 PM PST by cake_crumb (In God we Trust, so the ACLU can STFU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator



Clinton's ??????


18 posted on 12/20/2005 3:27:26 PM PST by late bloomer ( Neglegere homo pone aulaeum. semi-retired warlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb

You are right on that comment.


19 posted on 12/20/2005 3:56:07 PM PST by ANGGAPO (LayteGulfBeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: late bloomer

I meant the terrorist the Germans released... HIS head in a bag. Would it be illegal to post a bounty? Because I sure as hell would pitch in for it.


20 posted on 12/20/2005 4:15:18 PM PST by thoughtomator (Congrats Iraq!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson