Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Merry Christmas: The Union Got You Fired
FrontPage Magazine ^ | 20 December 2005 | Michael Reitz

Posted on 12/20/2005 5:01:30 AM PST by rdb3

Merry Christmas: The Union Got You Fired
By Michael Reitz
FrontPageMagazine.com | December 20, 2005

The Washington Federation of State Employees (WFSE), the state’s largest state employee union, is asking agencies to terminate dozens of workers, some just in time for Christmas. Why is a union, charged with representing the interests of employees, demanding that they be fired?

Simple: They haven’t paid their union dues.

The state’s new collective bargaining agreements, negotiated in 2004, require all covered employees—some 53,000 general government workers—to join the union or pay nonmember “representation fees.”

Hundreds of state workers objected to the mandatory dues, as they were not informed of this change before ratifying the collective bargaining agreements in September 2004. Additionally, they protested the coercive nature of the change—they must pay for union representation whether they want it or not.

Despite the outcry, the new contract went into effect July 1, 2005. When the deadline for paying union fees arrived, some 3,000 had still not signed their authorization cards. The union began notifying employees they were in non-compliance and would be terminated, as required by the contract. In November, the WFSE gave the state Labor Relations Office a list of 800 workers who had not yet paid. Pressure from both union representatives and management whittled the list down to about 300 hold-outs by December 10.

Now workers are getting “final warning” phone calls and letters from their agencies. Those who resist will be handed their pink slip in the next few weeks.

For those who have decided to keep their jobs, there is little tangible benefit to having union representation. Although unionized employees received a 3.2 percent salary increase, the raise was eaten up by union dues and increased health and pension contributions.

So who really benefits from this mandatory union representation?

Washington public-sector unions are clearly the immediate beneficiary. According to the Office of Financial Management, the average union employee will earn $41,236 in fiscal year 2006. With WFSE dues set at 1.37 percent of salary, the average employee will pay $564 annually in dues.

The union, therefore, will collect over $20 million from its members. This windfall is only possible because employees are forced to pay if they want to keep their jobs. The Evergreen Freedom Foundation recently conducted an informal survey of 1,700 state workers. Sixty-nine percent said they joined their union only to avoid termination.

Pro-labor politicians also stand to benefit from the unionization of state employees. In 2004, organized labor underwrote Governor Gregoire’s recount effort with $620,000 in contributions. Washington unions can also be credited with the Democrat majorities in both houses of the state legislature, after giving over $882,000 to Democrat legislative candidates in 2004.

Washington has effectively handed control of state employment over to union officials. Sadly, public service is no longer based on qualification or experience, but on membership in a private organization driven by political self-interest.

Click Here to support Frontpagemag.com.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: christmas; merrychristmas; stateunion; union; uniondues; wfse; yourefired
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 12/20/2005 5:01:31 AM PST by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Union Dues == Just another word for tax.

I would have my resume ready if I were them.

2 posted on 12/20/2005 5:09:39 AM PST by PetroniDE (We Don't Live in Texas Anymore --- State Name is Now TAXES !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

Nothing new here. I was almost fired from McDonnell Douglas back in '68 for the same reason (by the UAW). The deductions were taken from my check automatically but there was an accounting screwup.


3 posted on 12/20/2005 5:11:04 AM PST by jack308
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

aren't union dues automatically payroll deducted?


4 posted on 12/20/2005 5:20:21 AM PST by mcg2000 (New Orleans: The city that declared Jihad against The Red Cross.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcg2000

Is that supposed to make some sort of difference?


5 posted on 12/20/2005 5:23:06 AM PST by Doohickey (If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice...I will choose freewill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

Glad I'm not in a union!


6 posted on 12/20/2005 5:23:19 AM PST by NRA1995 (Jesus is the reason for the season)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jack308

Back in '68 I was grudgingly paying my Union Dues but was almost fired because I wouldn't "voluntarily donate" to the AFL-CIO's COPE (committee on political education"). After several threatening meetings with the shop steward and union officers I finally paid. They wanted 100% Voluntary participation (ala Marx and Lenin). Pay or lose your job.


7 posted on 12/20/2005 5:25:08 AM PST by Roamin53 (World War III started on Bill Clinton's watch....he just wasn't sure which side he was on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
The state’s new collective bargaining agreements, negotiated in 2004, require all covered employees—some 53,000 general government workers—to join the union or pay nonmember “representation fees.”

Nothing like having a 'choice', pay or pay? Did the non-union members get to vote on the 2004 contract that required a union shop?

8 posted on 12/20/2005 5:30:25 AM PST by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
First, I am laid off more than I work being Michigan is at the bottom of the barrel as far as big work is concerned. I'm in the Tile Marble and Terrazzo union, and it is not like the typical unions...we have to work for a living!

The transit authority in new york should all be fired, and, this must pay representation in your article is indeed bullshit. But, in my particular union, I am rather envious of these cats who are retiring after 35 years and getting $3,500 a month in pension. We all talk about companies who just let their old timers go and give them nothing in the end, or cut out what they were getting. This is the last of it ya know? Where else you gonna work for thirty years and get something in the end if you are not disciplined enough to bank your own money? I know, I know... We need to be disciplined.... but how many folks actually are that disciplined?? Taking money is a way of forcing the banking of hours...

If I need to clarify, I can, but I think I got you the message...

9 posted on 12/20/2005 5:42:36 AM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep
We need to be disciplined.... but how many folks actually are that disciplined??

My mother and father, my paternal uncles, certain friends of the family back home, and me. This is nothing special. I'm sure there are many, many more regular Americans who are like this.


10 posted on 12/20/2005 5:52:31 AM PST by rdb3 (I have named my greatest pain, and its name is Leftism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

The biggest employer IN the state of Washington IS the state of Washington.

I am not opposed to getting rid of a few state employees, by whatever means.


11 posted on 12/20/2005 5:58:01 AM PST by wyattearp (The best weapon to have in a gunfight is a shotgun - preferably from ambush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

How 'bout you?


12 posted on 12/20/2005 5:58:42 AM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep
How 'bout you?

In the post, "My mother and father, my paternal uncles, certain friends of the family back home, and me."

Asked and answered.


13 posted on 12/20/2005 6:01:04 AM PST by rdb3 (I have named my greatest pain, and its name is Leftism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

Outrageous!


14 posted on 12/20/2005 6:02:21 AM PST by MajorityOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
delay my last...did not see the "me".

Hope you can do it man, seriously. If you make enough to bank some away, god bless ya for doin' so. I work in construction and when laid off, do side work to pay the bills, against the unions wishes. A single income family, three kids and a stay at home mom, takes a lot these days and having something at the end of the month is not too common....

15 posted on 12/20/2005 6:03:34 AM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Although unionized employees received a 3.2 percent salary increase, the raise was eaten up by union dues and increased health and pension contributions

And without union negotiations??? There wouldn't be a raise...The cost of the pension and health benefits would have been a net negative on the paycheck...

But realistically, without the union, there would be no pension and likely no or little health coverage...What are these people whining about???

16 posted on 12/20/2005 6:13:21 AM PST by Iscool (Start your own revolution by voting for the candidates the media (and gov't) tells you cannot win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

Is this legal?


17 posted on 12/20/2005 6:13:43 AM PST by jb6 (The Atheist/Pagan mind, a quandary wrapped in egoism and served with a side order of self importance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
Besides, if they don't pay their dues, the "union leaders" might have to work for a living. Freaking gangsters
18 posted on 12/20/2005 6:20:53 AM PST by sticker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep
We all talk about companies who just let their old timers go and give them nothing in the end, or cut out what they were getting.

In the end, what were they owed? They did a job and they got paid for it. When they ceased to do the job, they ceased to get paid. There is no parental relationship...it was just a job.
19 posted on 12/20/2005 6:21:54 AM PST by P-40 (http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: P-40
I must be living in the past... And that was a time when a dedicated employee retired, he got the benefits promised to him when he hired in. Of late, it seems some companies want to change the game as it is played. When one hires into a major company, they are offered certain packages are they not?? This is what I speak of...
20 posted on 12/20/2005 6:26:50 AM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson