Posted on 11/29/2005 8:06:45 AM PST by Salo
November 28, 2005 08:47 AM US Eastern Timezone
Lockheed Martin Selects Concurrent's RedHawk Linux for THAAD Missile Defense Program; Concurrent's Real-Time Linux System Supports Mission-Critical Missile Defense Testing
DULUTH, Ga.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 28, 2005--Concurrent (NASDAQ: CCUR), a leading provider of integrated computer solutions for mission-critical applications, today announced that Lockheed Martin Space Systems has selected Concurrent's RedHawk(TM) Linux operating system for their United States Army Theater High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) program.
Lockheed Martin's selection of Concurrent technology is expected to serve as a launchpad for additional international partnerships in winning and executing global programs for global defense and civil government markets.
Lockheed Martin will use RedHawk real-time Linux in hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) simulation testing of strategic missile defense subsystems. HIL simulation is a critical product development process that provides for thorough testing of components in a virtual environment in which other subsystems are replaced by mathematical models. Components to be tested are inserted into a closed loop that is reproducible, systematic, fast and more reliable than actual bench testing.
Lockheed Martin selected RedHawk for the THAAD program due to the precision and guaranteed response time of Concurrent's RedHawk Linux real-time operating system. Only RedHawk Linux was able to ensure the high frame rates required in their HIL simulation without frame overruns, thereby ensuring the highest quality of system test.
Lockheed Martin also uses Concurrent's NightStar(TM) Tool Kit to reduce engineering time and labor costs. NightStar, a graphical user interface-based set of real-time software development tools, enables system builders to maximize productivity in application development. NightStar tools are specifically designed to allow integrators to intelligently identify problems early in the project life cycle - and correct them faster.
"We are honored to be chosen repeatedly by Lockheed Martin Space Systems," said Warren Neuburger, Concurrent COO. "Lockheed Martin is at the forefront of the aerospace and defense industry with a long history of technological excellence. We are pleased to contribute to Lockheed Martin's engineering success through its use of RedHawk Linux and other off-the-shelf components-based products such as the iHawk."
Concurrent iHawk systems are powered by as many as eight Intel Xeon(TM) or AMD Opteron(R) processors and up to 64 GB of memory in rack mount and tower enclosures. iHawks are true symmetric multiprocessors that run a single copy of RedHawk Linux. Configurable with a wide range of commercially available components, the iHawk is an increasing popular platform for today's simulation, data acquisition, and process control solutions.
RedHawk Linux provides fast response to external events, optimized inter-process communication, and high I/O throughput needed for time-critical applications. RedHawk Linux, compatible with the popular Red Hat system, has gained acceptance as a leading real-time Linux operating system for high-performance applications by customers throughout the world. RedHawk Linux guarantees that a user application can respond to an external event in less than 30 microseconds on a dedicated processor.
About Lockheed Martin
Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company, headquartered in Denver, Colo., is one of the major operating units of Lockheed Martin Corporation. Space Systems designs, develops, tests, manufactures and operates a variety of advanced technology systems for military, civil and commercial customers. Chief products include a full-range of space launch systems, including heavy-lift capability, ground systems, remote sensing and communications satellites for commercial and government customers, advanced space observatories and interplanetary spacecraft, fleet ballistic missiles and missile defense systems.
About Concurrent
Concurrent (www.ccur.com) is a global leader in providing digital on-demand systems to the broadband industry and real-time computer systems for industry and government. Concurrent's VOD systems are widely deployed worldwide by major broadband operators and provide a flexible, comprehensive, robust solution which is utilized within the domestic and international broadband cable, DSL, and IP-based markets. The company's powerful and scalable VOD systems are based on open standards and are integrated with the leading broadband technologies. Concurrent is also a leading provider of high performance, real-time computer systems, solutions, and software that focus on hardware-in-the-loop and man-in-the-loop simulation, data acquisition and process control for commercial and government markets. Concurrent has nearly four decades of experience in high performance, on-demand, mission-critical solutions and provides its best of breed solutions through offices in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia.
Certain statements made or incorporated by reference in this release may constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Statements regarding future events and development and our future performance, as well as our expectations, beliefs, plans, estimates, or projections relating to the future, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of these laws. These forward looking statements include, among others, statements regarding our products, release schedules, and product development. All forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events to differ materially from those projected. Such risks and uncertainties include our ability to meet release schedules, customer demands, accomplish development goals, integrate our products, and deploy integrated solutions.
Important risk factors are discussed in our Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Sept. 2, 2005 and may be discussed in subsequent filings with the SEC. The risk factors discussed in such Form 10-K under the heading "Risk Factors" are specifically incorporated by reference in this press release. Our forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and speak only as of the date of such statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of future events, new information, or otherwise.
Concurrent Computer Corporation and its logo are registered and unregistered trademarks of Concurrent Computer Corporation. All other product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.
What are you guys, Chinese sympathizers? Can't they get a free copy of this Red Hawk Linux if they want? Isn't that the license that Red Hawk has to use? It's not optional, is it? Red Hawk can't say no, you can't have that if I want a copy can they? Don't they have to give a copy to anyone who wants a copy?
Isn't that how Richard Stallman's GPL license works? Anybody that creates anything with it and distributes it has to also give it away, FOR FREE, to anyone right? Including the Chinese government, who can then rename it Red Flag, right? Isn't that what they do with their free copies of Linux over there? Rename them Red Flag?
Or are you saying they can't do that with this Red Hawk Linux? If not, explain why. And drop the crybaby personal attacks for once. I don't think you can.
why should we take some loser who hawks Microsoft like it's the 2nd coming seriously?
Are you mumbling something, or can you even form an answer? I didn't think so.
it's on you if you can't read and comprehend, not me to figure it out for you Mr. Gates....
Hiding firmly under your rock. Like normal.
What are you guys, Chinese sympathizers?
Physician, heal thyself.
And drop the crybaby personal attacks for once.
Q - "Don't they have to give a copy to anyone who wants a copy?"
A - "No. The GPL gives him permission to make and redistribute copies of the program if he chooses to do so. He also has the right not to redistribute the program, if that is what he chooses." - http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#CanIDemandACopy
"The GPL does not require you to release your modified version. You are free to make modifications and use them privately, without ever releasing them. This applies to organizations (including companies), too; an organization can make a modified version and use it internally without ever releasing it outside the organization." - http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLRequireSourcePostedPublic
Another verbal defecation. Read before spouting hysterically, please.
You were much kinder in your reply to him than I would have been.
Don't want to scare him off...then what would we do for fun?
LOL, you're so hypnotized you don't even know what you're talking about. Or worse.
The terms of the license are, if you "redistribute", you have to release the source code to anyone that asks for it. ANYONE. Read the terms of the license itself, Section 3, I guessed you missed it while you were gobbling up the propoganda (FAQ).
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl.html
That's why all these Red Hat knock offs exist. They have to give their source code away since they are selling the software, and alls these copies spring up. Talk about the bottom of the food chain, a knockoff of a knockoff.
But the Chicoms rename theirs "Red Flag" and use it to run their supercomputers, and who could blame them, they get their copies of GNU Linux for free, practically straight from the US DoD now it sounds like.
And here you are, unable to even properly spout the terms of the license they do this with, but still trying to defend it.
Exactly. If you redistribute it. If you do not, you are under no obligation to give any source code to anyone. Ergo, if I wish to create my own Linux distro to use in a simulation, I don't have to give it to, show it to, sell it to, lend it to, or rent it to anyone. Show me, in a cut-and-pasted quote, with a link (rather than your typical whiny lying) where it says otherwise. You can't and you know it, Buzzy. Give it up before you sound even more foolish.
"And here you are, unable to even properly spout the terms of the license they do this with, but still trying to defend it."
Nice try, but you're still a moron. There was no "spouting"...my irrefutable proof was cut and pasted directly from the FSF's site, the same one from which you posted a general link and gave me a vague excuse about section 3, which had nothing to do with anything.
If you have a problem with FSF's interpretation of GPL, maybe you should take it up with them. They know more way more about it than you do, despite your weak protests to the contrary.
Wanna try again, missy?
LOL, that was the actual license itself, did you not even know? What did you think it was? "A general link", LMAOOO! You don't even know what the actual license looks like, do you. And yet you call names? It really just doesn't get any more pathetic. "A general link"! HAHAHA is that not hilarious or what!
I'd call it a Flaming Death all right, a definite Crash and Burn.
" LOL, that was the actual license itself, did you not even know?"
Well, no sh**, Sherlock! You just posted a general link to the license itself, not any specific part of it,and said, "See? Told you so".
So, what part of the six-paragraph Section 3 proves whatever it is you're saying? Are you unable to cut and paste what you believed to be proof of your silly little statement?
Frankly, I'd be fascinated to find out what part of those paragraphs you interpret as meaning, "You must distribute your modified source code to anyone who asks for it."
"HAHAHA is that not hilarious or what!"
You're right. It's not hilarious.
In fact, your whole post was rather banal, and we're all slightly dumber for having read it.
Instead of responding to what I said, you found some perverted fixation with the word "General Link", so much so that you said it multiple times. Maybe you thought General Link was a character in a war movie. I don't know. It's hard to tell how (or if) your mind works (but I'm visualizing a fat little hamster in an exercise wheel, and I think I'm pretty close).
Anyway, I guess cutting and pasting, along with the smallest amount of command line work, is beyond your feeble comprehension. Typical. Or, maybe you didn't find anything to cut and paste?
I'd say that was the case. ;)
If I'm wrong, you could always try again...what part of Section 3 says you must distribute your modified software? I'll take a non-answer to mean, "I have no clue, I'm just making stuff up as I go along".
Heck, I'll probably take ANY answer of yours to mean,"I have no clue, I'm just making stuff up as I go along" .
"you didn't even recognize my link as the actual license,"
Keep believing that, as if it would make any difference if I hadn't. It took me to the same site I got my links from. Just because I didn't say, "Hey, that's the GPL license" doesn't mean that I didn't recognize it. That's a straw man, besides.
I'll repeat, but you won't answer because you can't, that you could prove your point by cutting and pasting your proof from that license in here. But you won't, because you have none. It's easier to spout off and cover your tracks with smoke and mirrors than to find out the facts to begin with.
"I'm not about to waste any more time trying to educate the impossibly ignorant"
Ok. As I said before, I'll take that to mean that you have no clue what you're talking about and are just making things up as you go along. Knowing what an arrogant ass you are, you'd jump at the chance to actually prove something if you could. But you can't, so you blow it off. If I'm wrong, prove it.
Not only that, it's VERY telling that you suddenly chose to "not waste any more time" right after I challenged you to back up your statement with facts. You're spinning in little circles again. Why won't you answer that question?
But it's not surprising in the least. You're interested in huffing and puffing, not discussion. Classic, unloved, attention deprived troll. Tsk, tsk, tsk.
Due to that and the extremely large number of inaccurate and idiotic posts you've presented to this point, you are no longer relevant. Thanks and have a nice day.
"What are you guys, Chinese sympathizers?"
No thats Billg. (pronounced bilge)
The guy who lets Chinese communists see his source code, but not Americans. That and gives his OS to them for free.
"why should we take some loser who hawks Microsoft like it's the 2nd coming seriously?"
GE is still buay wiping Bill Gates first coming off his chin.
;)
Oh I know.
And I won't converse with GE anymore either.
I will get a combination of "You're a chinese sympathizer" or "You don't know what you are talking about" or "You're hiding under your rock as usual (when I ignore him completely)". Instead I would rather watch him get taken apart on every thread by people that aren't normally on these type of threads.
It's great.
I am sure he has his voodoo doll of Steve Jobs completely torn apart by now :)
bump
Obvious lie, worse is you know it is. Linux is what they get for free, to do with whatever they want, include name it "Red Flag" and resell it without a dime back to the U.S.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.