Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thousands of buildings collapse after China quake
Agence France Presse | November 26, 2005

Posted on 11/25/2005 9:28:40 PM PST by HAL9000

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last
To: Ichneumon

Maybe this has something to do with it?

---

Ah yes, communism at its best.


41 posted on 11/25/2005 11:03:18 PM PST by BoBToMatoE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger
The sick and dead have FULL Commie cradle-to-grave Hillarycare so they don't need any Red Cross help, right?

No, not since "market reforms" several years ago.

There was a story posted a couple days ago about a peasant woman who suffered a stroke, and the family couldn't afford to leave her in the hospital any longer, so SENT HER TO BE CREMATED.

The mortician saw tears in her eyes, and called a halt, and notified authorities.

42 posted on 11/25/2005 11:10:50 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

My first thought.

8000 buildings collapsed?

Yeah. Uhhh... Yeah.

Six people dead?

One of these figures is damned wrong.


43 posted on 11/25/2005 11:19:23 PM PST by furquhart (Gingrich '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: furquhart

Of course, it could well be a bunch of crappy huts.

Not tens of thousands dead, then. Say a thousand or so. Happens all the time in China.


44 posted on 11/25/2005 11:21:17 PM PST by furquhart (Gingrich '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
if there's reports of EMP damage in the area, then we'll *know* what it was, for sure.

And if not, then we'll 'know' it was just one of their burning coal deposits collapsing in on itself.

45 posted on 11/25/2005 11:26:17 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
I hazard a guess the buildings were built in disregard of modern construction standards. No wonder the loss of life in China's been considerable. But in a Communist dictatorship, the individual counts for very little in the larger scheme of things.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie.Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

46 posted on 11/25/2005 11:29:08 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Another of my pet peeves (I guess the media is having a 'tick Karen off' weekend). I suppose it's possible that all those buildings collapsed and the people died AFTER the earthquake, and since I wasn't there I can't really assert otherwise, but it seems far more likely that those events occurred DURING the earthquake. Exactly how many people succumbed to H5N1 after the earthquake will probably never be known. That is making me a little edgy.


47 posted on 11/25/2005 11:45:11 PM PST by KarinG1 (Some of us are trying to engage in philosophical discourse. Please don't allow us to interrupt you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

That's why we don't have our buildings made in China. Who cares if toys collapse.


48 posted on 11/25/2005 11:46:47 PM PST by rfreedom4u (Native Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

How do over 8000 buildings go down and so few die?


49 posted on 11/26/2005 1:38:09 AM PST by beyond the sea (Murtha: Redeployment - What .......Surrender? // “Victory is not a strategy”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daybreakcoming
I'm glad Pres Bush got his visit there out of the way before Rove started experimenting with his latest earthquake model.

Yes, that's what they get for building directly on
The George Bush's Fault.

50 posted on 11/26/2005 1:38:50 AM PST by Watery Tart (Well, SOMEBODY had to say it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

LOL.


51 posted on 11/26/2005 1:38:51 AM PST by beyond the sea (Murtha: Redeployment - What .......Surrender? // “Victory is not a strategy”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: paulat
How do they come up with "8,072" right off the bat??

"Karnac The Magnificent."

52 posted on 11/26/2005 1:42:19 AM PST by beyond the sea (Murtha: Redeployment - What .......Surrender? // “Victory is not a strategy”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Hmmm.


53 posted on 11/26/2005 1:44:32 AM PST by beyond the sea (Murtha: Redeployment - What .......Surrender? // “Victory is not a strategy”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
8,000+ buildings 'toppled'but only 5 or 6 dead? something doesn't sound right

Maybe it means only 6 dead found so far... Or maybe these are all pretty whimpy light bamboo structures.

I gotta ask how a 5.7 damages that many buildings, thats just a strong window-rattler in most places.

54 posted on 11/26/2005 1:54:19 AM PST by adamsjas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
Yup, and it's right about where you'd expect someone to put a test silo.

ROFLMAO.

It's nowhere remotely near the Chinese test area of Lop Nor, which is a completely unpopulated area and a perfectly good area to test in, unlike the area where this quake occured.

What on earth possesses people to have a desperate desire to stupidly proclaim earthquakes nuclear tests? I see it all the time.

While unlike the vast majority of quakes this quake actually was small enough for it to physically to have been caused by a nuke, there is an OBVIOUS difference in the seismograms of the two, such that even an amateur with a homemade seismograph could tell the difference. I assure you the seismogram of this quake in no way resembles that of a nuke.

You'd already be seeing headlines of "Chinese nuke test undeground" if it was a nuke.

55 posted on 11/26/2005 3:50:50 AM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: adamsjas
I gotta ask how a 5.7 damages that many buildings, thats just a strong window-rattler in most places.

This is not unheard of in an area where strong quakes are rare (as is true in this part of China) and where the quake was DIRECTLY under a populated area.

56 posted on 11/26/2005 3:51:38 AM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: al baby
wheres fema?

"We need 500 Greyhounds man! Get off your a$$es! I am pi$$ed!"

Can we send him to China?

57 posted on 11/26/2005 4:19:07 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: paulat

"How do they come up with "8,072" right off the bat??"





Trace the information back to the source, one step at a time, and it's not hard to figure out. This came from an official source, meaning he checks with the Party before blabbing, in an attempt to keep his head long enough to collect his Pulitzer.

He got it from other official sources, double CYA. Joe Chang, head of CHEMA in downtown Sechzuan said he had 3 dead and 8000 buildings down, an estimate from an early People's Army helicopter fly-over.

Steve Chong, chief of police in Mayberry, a small town in Jillhack province, passed on an account from his deputy Pharney Phife, saying he had no dead (yet) but had counted at least 72 buildings collapsed.

Voila, official reports claim 8072 buildings collapsed.

SOP for early third world disaster reports. The dead will climb, the collapses will bounce around and eventually stabilize, the after shocks will topple leaners, the isolated areas will practice triage, and in a bout a month, we will have some pretty hard numbers.


58 posted on 11/26/2005 5:19:54 AM PST by jeffers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot

How about less that 2.4 hours?? Something is wacko with this and I have not heard tiddly squat about it on the main stream media!


59 posted on 11/26/2005 8:22:45 AM PST by pollywog (Psalm 121;1 I Lift my eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch; neverdem; nopardons; Calpernia; SJackson

That is a poignant story!

At the human level, individuals within bureaucracies, even the worst kind, will do the RIGHT thing despite the 'rules.'

I'm aware of some of the 'market reform' of late; my comment was intended partly as a slam on HRC's evil utopian schemes, past and future.


60 posted on 11/26/2005 8:28:26 AM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson