REINVENTING HILLARY... AGAIN (clinton machine dumps Geena Davis for Margaret Thatcher)

ABC News via Free Republic | 11.23.05 | Mia T

[Mia T]

bump

[Alberta's Child]

So whose trial balloon, anyway?

The same Democrat Party apparatus that in 2004 took front-runner Howard Dean and turned him into a fringe candidate. They will never put up a candidate in an open election who doesn't have a solid chance of winning the election.

[Mia T]

 

Under normal circumstances, what you say is true (notwithstanding the plain fact that Howard Dean is a deranged nobody who made the fatal mistake of revealing his psychoses in real time).

HEAR CHRIS MATTHEWS + MAUREEN DOWD DEVOUR HILLARY


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

But the clintons OWN the Democrat Party. Chris Matthews alluded precisely to this point: If Pee Wee Herman would give her a race...

 

[Mia T]

Thanks for raising this excellent issue. I had the same thought initially.... but then I asked myself: who would stop her?

Sorry if I came off angry... I have turkey on my brain today... so much to do, so little time.... (wasn't planning to post today, and then this revolting Thatcher proxy emerges. ;)

have a great T day.

[Mia T]

bump

[FlyVet]

Clinton Opposes Immediate Withdrawal, But Says U.S. Must Tell Iraq 'We Aren't Going to Be There Forever'

Wow. An eye-wateringly brilliant policy. Right there sittin' on the picket. Hillary the Hawk make that up all by herself?

[Mia T]

Typical clinton banality. This is what passes for brilliance. Says something about the Left, doesn't it?

[Cautor]

Another well deserved Mia T bump.

You're always on guard to help the rest of us recognize the latest schemes by the Klintoons. I've noticed that Hillary herself is like a night shade--almost invisible. Yet her filthy pawprints are everywhere. You correctly dub this the proxy strategy. I like this bit especially:


For the most part, missus clinton operates in absentia, by proxy.


You rarely see her. You almost never hear her. (Think of it as the hillary! 2000 'listening tour' extended ad nauseam.)


And in those rare instances where she does actually speak, the 'event' is always prearranged, prescripted, prepeopled and preprogrammed by the clinton political machine.


If you stop and think about it, the American voter hasn't ever had the opportunity to see, hear, examine the actual merchandise...much less contemplate the return policy.


There are three principal reasons for this clinton scheme.


To conceal the hillary dud factor. (See SCHEMA PINOCCHIO: how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor)2


To shield missus clinton from questions concerning clinton corruption, clinton abuse of women, clinton abuse of power, clinton utter failure to confront terrorism, etc.


To allow missus clinton to pose as a moderate without overly enraging her radical leftist comrades (Cindy Sheehan excepted).

[Mia T]

Sounds more like a schoolmarm than a commander-in-chief, doesn't it?

The clintons are such mediocrities. Surely someone on the Left must be smart enough to see this....

[Cautor]

BTTT

[HarleyLady27]

HOW DARE THIS TRASH SL-T THINK SHE IS ANYWHERE NEAR MRS. THATCHER.

Mrs. Thatcher is a lady, smart, kind, devoted. Absolutly NOTHING this clinton slime is...

HOW DARE SHE!!!!

[Mia T]

thx Cautor. :)

[Cautor]

Once more to the top.

I know who Hillary Klintoon is, and she's no Margaret Thatcher.

[FlyVet]

Surely someone on the Left must be smart enough to see this....

The ones who are smart enough don't care. She is their tool. Bought and paid for. Since she's raising so much cash, I'd like to see a list of her big-time donors, so we know their agendas and what she owes them.

Just think, for the next three years the mediots will be pounding it home that Hillary! is the Second Coming, our god and saviour, while undermining anything and anyone conservative. I remind myself what awful candidates Gore and Kerry were, and how close they came. Can Hillary! deceive enough people? I don't know. But I don't think it's a given that she can't.

[Mia T]

bump

[Mia T]

thx again :)

[Mia T]

bump

[The Foolkiller]

But the Clintons OWN the Democratic Party.

---

Exactly. And the day the party sold its soul to them is the day they started losing most elections. You'd think they'd have learned that by now.

[Mia T]

 

I think the dynamic is different with missus clinton.

To call missus clinton 'polarizing' is, at best, an act of compassion. 'Polarizing' implies support by one's side, but, as we know, many on the Left do NOT support missus clinton.

A more accurate description: missus clinton is despised universally on the Right and not insignificantly across the ideological spectrum. Many on the Left resent her cutting in, resent her sense of entitlement, resent her manifest lack of qualifications, resent her corruption, resent her unconcern about damaging the party.

Missus clinton will be the instument of her own defeat because she will mobilize the GOP like nothing we've ever seen before and mobilize many on the Left either to field an alternative who is qualified, uncorrupt and likeable... or to stay home.

Moreover, what we see now is likely hillary's apogee. With 100% name recognition and virtually 0% abuse-of-power/abuse-of-women/terrorism-failure recognition, clinton support can only go in one direction... and it isn't up.

[Mia T]

over here