Posted on 11/23/2005 2:56:59 AM PST by NYpeanut
So, Bill Clinton got it wrong as usual, by making a smarmy plea for a truce of civility from his Little Rock library redoubt. The Iraq debate does not need to become less rude or less intense. It needs to become much more bitter and much more polarized. As I never tire of saying, heat is not the antithesis of light but rather the source of it. No, the problem with the Iraq confrontation, as fought "at home," is not its level of anger but its level of argument. After almost three years of combat, the standard of debate ought to have risen and to have become more serious and acute. Instead, it has slipped into a state of puerility.
(Excerpt) Read more at slate.com ...
Even if you were against invading Iraq, Iraq has now become the front-line in the war with Islamo-facsism.
Nope.
Congress has become the front line in the war on Islamo-Fascism.
It's early dude... I'm just getting started!
Clinton/Murtha advocating a pull out again!
There is a report floating around that Clinton was advised by Congressman Murtha to pull our of Somalia after our guys were ambushed....and Bin Laden said that pull out proved that the US could be attacked and wouldn't retaliate.
Maybe we should also re-arm Iraq after we cede the country. We could even work on improving Iraqi contacts with North Korea and Iran.
That would solve the problem.
As to Congress, I agree with Mark Twain - "It could probably be shown with facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal element excepting Congress."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.