Posted on 11/16/2005 12:27:27 PM PST by NewMediaFan
Bob Woodward apologized today to The Washington Post's executive editor for failing to tell him for more than two years that a senior Bush administration official had told him about CIA operative Valerie Plame, even as an investigation of those leaks mushroomed into a national scandal.
Woodward, an assistant managing editor and best-selling author, said he told Leonard Downie Jr. that he held back the information because he was worried about being subpoenaed by Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the special counsel in the case.
"I apologized because I should have told him about this much sooner," Woodward said in an interview. "I explained in detail that I was trying to protect my sources. That's Job No. 1 in a case like this. . . .
"I hunkered down. I'm in the habit of keeping secrets. I didn't want anything out there that was going to get me subpoenaed."
Downie, who was informed by Woodward late last month, said in a separate interview that his most famous employee had "made a mistake." Despite Woodward's concerns about his confidential sources, Downie said, "he still should have come forward, which he now admits. We should have had that conversation . . . I'm concerned that people will get a misimpression about Bob's value to the newspaper and our readers because of this one instance in which he should have told us sooner."...
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Something smells funny here
I'm sorry - that's it? What about Scooter?
he was worried about being subpoenaed by Patrick J. Fitzgerald-- how nice.
Is this the dude that speaks about 10 words per minute?
Will someone please take a minute to enlighten me?
With all the facts, and accusations and contradictory information out there, color me confused.
Is this revelation a good, or bad thing?
damage has been done, that was the real agenda
Maybe Woodward should apologize to the various people who went through the Grand Jury investigation. His timely testimony might have saved people some grief. Maybe even an indictment or two.
Clarification needed. Wash Post requires all reporters to declare all sources to superiors?
Me too, it is so confusing. BUT one thing that comes to my mind - Woodward would like a re-run of WATERGATE!!
all you need to know is this - the media people involved in this can say anything they want to the GJ and investigators, get the prosecutor to accept whater confidentiality agreements they dream up, without fear. and Libby is the guy holding an indictment.
I believe in this case, the editor specifically asked the reporters to reveal if anyone knew anything about Plame.
"He said he had "pushed" his other administration source, without success, to allow him to discuss that person's identity, but that the source has insisted that the waiver applies only to Woodward's testimony."
So did Woodward testify about this source? Is it the same as Novak's?
That's just his 'source', Deep S#!t.
Sounds like Woodward will soon be joining Judy Miller in exile.
He was worried about being subpoenaed but then ended up getting subpoenaed anyway? Why now and not before? Did he get religion in the meantime and decide he better talk to the SP?
Bump. The MSM has a license to lie and the Republicans are about to give them a get out of jail free card to keep it up with impunity.
Planet Mars?
"I believe in this case, the editor specifically asked the reporters to reveal if anyone knew anything about Plame."
The chances Pincus' wife didn't tell him about Plame are about as good as Wilson's wife not telling him about the Niger docs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.