Its about time we investigated Joe Wilson and "Valerie Plame
Bond"..LOL..
I agree that anyone who exposes an undercover CIA operative should be punished. That would exclude anyone who talked about Valerie Plame, because she wasn't undercover and she was a CIA analyst at the time.
Where was the call for Reno to be fired. She burned alive 80 men, women and children.
ON THE NET...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1515630/posts
Ummmmmmmmm...seems to me, that Dems from Maryland should keep their lops zipped, since they have quite the SCANDAL of their own right now.
Hmmmm?? Is this why we saw Hillary being so chummy with Barbara the last few days .. perhaps giving Barbara a few tips on what to say ..??
As usual .. the dems are overplaying their hand. Just like they did with the "it's Bush's fault" - this will sink them also.
 |
 |
 |
|
The left is becoming a 'lil bit boring with this "come clean BS." |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
!
Demands W.H. bail us out of our sorry big-time fork-up!!!
Vallely said, citing CIA colleagues, that in addition to his conversations with Wilson, the ambassador was proud to introduce Plame at cocktail parties and other social events around Washington as his CIA wife.
"That was pretty common knowledge," he said Friday. "She's been out there on the Washington scene many years."
If Plame were a covert agent at the time, Vallely said, "he would not have paraded her around as he did."
"This whole thing has become the biggest non-story I know," he concluded, "and all created by Joe Wilson." WorldNetDaily- Joe Wilson fumes over Vallely charges in WND
FreeRepublic link: Joe Wilson fumes over Vallely charges in WND
I get this image of a 'blue dress' being sent to the cleaners
Except the idea he made such a pledge is FALSE, FAKED, FRAUDULENT, Ms. Mikulski. You're either a LIAR or a SHILL.
Let me bury you with facts, Ms. Mikulski:
Let's look at the timeline and actual quotes and context of what Bush said or what others said on his behalf:
Scott McClellan - 29 Sept 2003: "The President has set high standards, the highest of standards for people in his administration. He's made it very clear to people in his administration that he expects them to adhere to the highest standards of conduct. If anyone in this administration was involved in it, they would no longer be in this administration."
SUMMARY: Press Secretary says if anyone is involved, they'd be tossed.
Bush - 30 Sept 2003: " And if there is a leak out of my administration, I want to know who it is. And if the person has violated law, the person will be taken care of. ... I don't know of anybody in my administration who leaked classified information. If somebody did leak classified information, I'd like to know it, and we'll take the appropriate action."
SUMMARY: BUSH himself says, "And if this person violated the law..."
Scott McClellan - 7 Oct 2003: "Let me answer what the President has said. I speak for the President and I'll talk to you about what he wants." and "If someone leaked classified information, the President wants to know. If someone in this administration leaked classified information, they will no longer be a part of this administration, because that's not the way this White House operates, that's not the way this President expects people in his administration to conduct their business."
SUMMARY: Press Secretary: Returns to his original line and ignores what Bush actually said which included the distiction about the law being broken. GAFFE again by S. McClellan.
Bush - 10 June 2004: He get a question from a reporter. Here is the exchange:
QUESTION: Given -- given recent developments in the CIA leak case, particularly Vice President Cheney's discussions with the investigators, do you still stand by what you said several months ago, a suggestion that it might be difficult to identify anybody who leaked the agent's name?
THE PRESIDENT: That's up to --
QUESTION: And, and, do you stand by your pledge to fire anyone found to have done so?
THE PRESIDENT: Yes. And that's up to the U.S. Attorney to find the facts.
QUESTION: My final point would be -- or question would be, has Vice President Cheney assured you --
THE PRESIDENT: It's up to the --
QUESTION: -- subsequent to his conversations with them, that nobody --
THE PRESIDENT: I haven't talked to the Vice President about this matter, and I suggest -- recently -- and I suggest you talk to the U.S. Attorney about that.
SUMMARY: Bush reiterated what he's been saying since 30 Sept 2003 but with the interruptions he makes a technical error bu answering the press question in the affirmative. Notice the press guy is actually mischaracterizing what it clearly the record of Bush's position going back to 2003: If you are a criminal, you're gone. Press ignores colleague played sound bite "gotcha" and run with it.
Bush - July 18, 2005: "If someone committed crime, they will no longer work in my administration."
SUMMARY: Bush yet again repeats what he said in 2003 and 2004.
SUMMARY: Bush reiterated what he's been saying since 30 Sept 2003 to the effect of 'If a crime is committed, you're gone.' BUT it's at this point the press decides to ignore the facts and timeline and say Bush has suddenly "raised the bar" because Rove and Libby might be involved.
CONCLUSION: Bush has been consistent since 2003 on this matter. The press has engaged in false reporting. The press is deliberately manipulating the news to harm this President and this administration. Barbara Mikulski, like Harry Reid a few weeks ago, and still others of the Democrat cabal of corruption has repeated the "common knowledge" created by the press lies to further his agenda. Press Secretary Scott McClellan should be FIRED for professional incompetence.
Now shut-up with your LIES, Ms. Mikulski and get to work on the American People's business!
Mikulski suffers from severe moonbatitis.
Either that or she's jonesin' bad for hitlery.
RATs gone wild --- just a natural thing. They've lost it.
If we had an honest media in this country nearly everyone would be able to acknowledge that truth.
****
The old established/liberal/socialist media is America's most ruthless, relentless, and destructive enemy.
***
Somehow, some way the old media must go away.
Hmm? Wonder if I should use that as my tagline?
