Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newspaper Industry At Tipping Point; Online Media Stealing Readers and Ad Revenues
News Busters ^ | 11/1/05 | Noel Sheppard

Posted on 11/01/2005 8:11:22 PM PST by Only Waxing

“IT'S OFFICIAL: 2005 WILL BE the newspaper industry's worst year since the last ad industry recession.”

So began an article from yesterday’s Media Daily News.

“‘Sadly, 2005 is shaping up as the industry's worst year from a revenue growth perspective since the recession impacted 2001-2002 period,’ says the report from Goldman Sachs, adding a warning that meaningful growth in 2006 is ‘very unlikely.’"

The problem? Ad revenues, which continue to grow by a meager 1 percent nationally. By contrast, online newspaper revenues are forecast to grow by 25 percent next year.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: liberalmedia; newspapers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 11/01/2005 8:11:25 PM PST by Only Waxing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Only Waxing
"Former ABC News reporter/anchor Sam Donaldson is ready to say the last rites for network news because it will soon lose its dominant position as Americans' primary source of news. 'I think it's dead. Sorry,' he said during a breakfast panel Tuesday at the National Association of Broadcasters' convention in Las Vegas." -- Bill McConnell, Broadcasting & Cable, 4/18/2005
"Print is dead... Get over it."-- John Squires, President, Sports Illustrated, Nov. 2004 quoted in the Washington Post 2-20-2005
"...the notion of a neutral, non-partisan mainstream press was, to me at least, worth holding onto.   Now it's pretty much dead, at least as the public sees things." -- Howard Fineman, "The 'Media Party' is over" MSNBC, 1-11-05
"...the mainstream media's monopoly on information is over." --Peggy Noonan, WSJ, Jan. 13, 2005
"Sept. 9, 2004, will be remembered as a paradigm-shifting day in media history. That was the day the 'blogosphere' took down CBS News" -- James Pinkerton, Newsday, Sept. 14, 2004
"The New York Times’ account of the [CNN chief] Eason Jordan resignation provides a general recap of the story they didn’t cover, along with a good dose of excuses and justifications ..." -- Lorie Byrd, Polipundit, 2-12-2005
"The New York Times, CBS and the BBC all had to fire lead personnel over the fact that they just damn well made stuff up out of whole cloth in service to an obviously partisan political agenda."-- New Sisyphus, 3-15-05
"The media can now wistfully reflect on their glory days of the 1970's when the majority of people actually bought into their bullshit."-- Laura K. Van Onymous
"Newspapers do have a few things going for them....you can't line the bird cage with the Internet or wrap fish in a cable news channel." -- Neal Boortz
-- there's a lot more where those came from: on THIS PAGE!
2 posted on 11/01/2005 8:15:19 PM PST by FreeKeys ("Sometimes the fourth estate seems more like a fifth column." -- Dr. Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Only Waxing

It is not "Stealing" when you earn it.


3 posted on 11/01/2005 8:17:10 PM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Only Waxing
Stealing readers? This mentality is why newspapers are losing readership. The Liberal mindset just can't grasp the notion that reasonable, intelligent people can disagree reasonably and intelligently. No one's stealing readers. The mainstream media is repelling their own readership with such a condescending attitude and they just can't bring themselves to see that fact.
4 posted on 11/01/2005 8:19:18 PM PST by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Only Waxing

3.8% GDP growth and the Dinasour Media LOSES ground! HAAAAAAAAAAAAA! Merry Alitomas Democrats.


5 posted on 11/01/2005 8:20:54 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Merry Alitomas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Only Waxing
Maybe if the newspapers went back to providing content other than what has been spoon-fed to them by AP and UPI, this might not happen. Years ago when I lived in Dallas, I liked to read the Dallas Morning News so that I could get the news. There seems to be no real investigative reporting any more.

I was appreciative of the nationally-known, syndicated columnists' writings on the editorial page. Now when I get the DMN, syndicated columnists are few and far between.

Reporters focus on low-interest human interest stories rather than on the news. By the time the DMN comes out, I've already read all the news that's of interest to me, along with a lot of associated commentary from being on-line.

also, about 80% of the bulk of the paper is advertising that I'm not the least bit interested in. This goes immediately to the recycle bin without my even looking at it.

And there's another thing. I get up early so I can read the paper before I have to go to work. 2/3 of the time, it isn't delivered until it's time for me to leave. And by the time I get home at night, the printed news is ancient history. It seems like I'm subscribing only to read the comics.

6 posted on 11/01/2005 8:21:15 PM PST by Real Cynic No More (Al-Jazeera is to the Iraqi War as CBS was to the Vietnam War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Only Waxing
STEALING?

Uh uh. They threw them away with their biased, arrogant, fact-free content.

And then they blame the folks who picked up and made use of what they threw away.

7 posted on 11/01/2005 8:22:07 PM PST by AnAmericanMother (. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Only Waxing

Stealing?
Sounds more like...choice!
I thought choice was good.


8 posted on 11/01/2005 8:23:08 PM PST by polymuser (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Only Waxing

Boy, that just breaks my heart.


9 posted on 11/01/2005 8:26:31 PM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Only Waxing

The internet is becoming just like talk radio. Dominated by the right.


10 posted on 11/01/2005 8:30:59 PM PST by umgud (Comment removed by poster before moderator could get to it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Only Waxing
Newspapers and MSM need to know that I can form my own opinion and I don't need to be force fed their's. I know they try to disguise it as news but I just can't get past the bias to the news.

"We report, you decide" is a pretty good motto. :-}

11 posted on 11/01/2005 8:32:47 PM PST by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Only Waxing
It really is a shame, it didn't have to be this way. After all, there was nothing more relaxing than sitting outside in the morning drinking coffee and reading the paper. Then they had to go and spoil everything by pusing an agenda intead of just reporting the news.

That relaxing habit went from a comforting act to anger at the blatant one sided presentation of the news and then eventually, you just stopped doing something you'd done everyday for years because it simply wasn't worth it.

The big losers are the stockholders, they really should have put a stop to the crap years ago, so I don't feel especially sorry for them.

12 posted on 11/01/2005 8:33:21 PM PST by McGavin999 (Reporters write the Truth, Journalists write "Stories")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polymuser
I thought choice was good.

Only if you agree with them.

13 posted on 11/01/2005 8:36:35 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Only Waxing
I think the tipping point was not the Rathergate fiasco, but the earlier fiasco of how Howell Raines more or less protected Jayson Blair (despite Blair's known problems writing stories) at the New York Times and how the blogosphere exposed that so fast that Raines didn't know what hit him when he was more or less forced to resign as Editor-in-Chief at the paper. That proved the MSM was extremely vulnerable to New Media and the Rathergate fiasco was final confirmation of that fact.

As a result, Americans are nowadays very skeptical of the MSM and that explains why the old-line newspapers, TV channels, and newsweeklies are suffering circulation losses.

14 posted on 11/01/2005 8:46:58 PM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud
The Internet is becoming just like talk radio. Dominated by the right.

Because both the Internet and Talk Radio require THOUGHT where the Hysteric Left can only emote.

15 posted on 11/01/2005 8:49:01 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Merry Alitomas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Only Waxing
Online Media Stealing Readers and Ad Revenues Exposing MSM's Lies
16 posted on 11/01/2005 8:52:16 PM PST by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
Just canceled my subscription to the AJC after they ran a Luckovitch editorial cartoon that offended me deeply and prompted me to evaluate the utility of a subscription. It came up negative. Say Bye!
17 posted on 11/01/2005 9:22:11 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Only Waxing

I still enjoy reading the newspaper...but half the time I read it for free at the library or coffee shop.


18 posted on 11/01/2005 9:25:48 PM PST by Ciexyz (Let us always remember, the Lord is in control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys
Still, the notion of a neutral, non-partisan mainstream press was, to me at least, worth holding onto.

LOL... The best laugh I've had in a week!

Howard Fineman, When exactly did this "neutral, non-partisan mainstream press" exist? Certainly not in the last fifty years.

19 posted on 11/01/2005 9:33:33 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Only Waxing

Gonna be a lot of unemployed "journalist's" out there:)


20 posted on 11/01/2005 9:43:52 PM PST by Thombo2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson