To: CyberAnt
Martha Stewart was convicted of making false or misleading statements to an FBI investigator when she wasn't under oath about something she was not charged with.
bottom line is, yes, he can indict them if he wants to.
I'm betting he indicts the Wilsons, along with several members of a cabal of politically motivated bureaucrats in CIA and State (mostly clintonista holdovers) for consipriring with the French DGSE to run a clandestine operation to undermine the elected government of the United States.
Treason is a crime punishable by death, particularly in time of war.
52 posted on
10/26/2005 2:12:57 PM PDT by
Phsstpok
(There are lies, damned lies, statistics and presentation graphics, in descending order of truth)
To: Phsstpok
I have said 999,999 times, to a conviction YOU MUST PROVE MENS REA.
From Tom McGuire. "Think back to the controversial Martha Stewart case: Martha went down on a false statements charge, but as supporting evidence of her criminal intent the prosecution had evidence that she may have altered her records, supplemented by troubling testimony from her broker's assistant and a personal friend"
60 posted on
10/26/2005 2:19:38 PM PDT by
Perdogg
("Facts are stupid things." - President Ronald Wilson Reagan)
To: Phsstpok
I sure hope you're right! The media will be jumping out of high-rises!
84 posted on
10/26/2005 2:44:18 PM PDT by
CyberAnt
(I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson