Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Novak report (Vanity)
Town Hall ^ | Jul 14, 2003, | Robert Novak

Posted on 10/25/2005 9:04:09 PM PDT by Prost1

Jul 14, 2003 "Wilson never worked for the CIA, but his wife, Valerie Plame, is an Agency operative on weapons of mass destruction. Two senior administration officials told me Wilson's wife suggested sending him to Niger to investigate the Italian report. The CIA says its counter-proliferation officials selected Wilson and asked his wife to contact him. "I will not answer any question about my wife," Wilson told me."

http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?p=robert+novak+valerie+plame+wilson&btn=Search&ei=UTF-8&u=www.townhall.com/columnists/robertnovak/rn20031001.shtml&w=robert+novak+valerie+plame+wilson&d=TOWy8mFULq8x&icp=1&.intl=us Oct 1, 2003 "During a long conversation with a senior administration official, I asked why Wilson was assigned the mission to Niger. He said Wilson had been sent by the CIA's counterproliferation section at the suggestion of one of its employees, his wife. It was an offhand revelation from this official, who is no partisan gunslinger. When I called another official for confirmation, he said: "Oh, you know about it." The published report that somebody in the White House failed to plant this story with six reporters and finally found me as a willing pawn is simply untrue. ... How big a secret was it? It was well known around Washington that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA. Republican activist Clifford May wrote Monday, in National Review Online, that he had been told of her identity by a non-government source before my column appeared and that it was common knowledge. Her name, Valerie Plame, was no secret either, appearing in Wilson's "Who's Who in America" entry."

(Excerpt) Read more at 66.218.69.11 ...


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: cialeak; novak; plame
Please note: her name was no secret, "appearing in 'Who's Who...'".

Plame's position was from a "senior official" that she worked in the "CIA's counterproliferation section".

So, there is no outing except by Wilson!

Any other conclusion is political!

Reread the above cited articles. Novak is quite clear. And, it was the CIA that referred this "outing" to the Justice Deptment during an National Election causing a special prosecutor to be appointed.

The crime is the misuse of government funds to send a spouse on a trip to Niger for which he was unqualified and to attempt to turn a federal election using the powers of the court and MSM in fabricating crimes on the part of the Executive that could not be responded to since an investigation was/is in progress.

This is sedition of the highest order and quite possibly treason.

1 posted on 10/25/2005 9:04:09 PM PDT by Prost1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Prost1

Does the CIA normally send someone who does NOT work for the CIA or even the government (he was privately employed) on a government mission?? That makes NO sense.


2 posted on 10/25/2005 9:14:01 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prost1
This is sedition of the highest order

I agree its sedition

and quite possibly treason.

Perhaps,

Wolf
3 posted on 10/25/2005 9:19:36 PM PDT by RunningWolf (tag line limbo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prost1
Historically, then under the (expired) Ethics in Government Act, and now after its expiration, there is only one way you get a special prosecutor/independent counsel. That is for the Attorney General to agree to his/her appointment.

Under the EIGA, the AG would send 3 names to the special division (3 judge panel) and outline jurisdiction. The special division would pick the IC and establish jurisdiction on basis of AG's recommendation. I suppose it's done the same way after expiration of EIGA.

The question is, why did the AG authorize this investigation in the first place?

4 posted on 10/25/2005 9:25:09 PM PDT by phelanw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prost1

It was no secret that Valerie Plame (Wilson) was married to Joe Wilson. It apparently was a secret that Valerie Plame worked for the CIA. She was supposed to be some kind of analyst for an energy company.


5 posted on 10/25/2005 9:27:03 PM PDT by Prodn2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prost1

Moving along, nothing to see here, keep moving along...

Holy cow, when will this ever end.


6 posted on 10/25/2005 9:39:52 PM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet (If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

My question is-- how is it possible that Wilson is not violating some kind of law by "publishing" his alleged findings in the press? If he went on some kind of "fact finding" mission for the CIA, how is it possible for him to reveal them to a newspaper, and why is this not some kind of breach of security? My head hurts.....


7 posted on 10/25/2005 9:55:51 PM PDT by scott says
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: phelanw

The AG did not authorize it (Ashcroft). He recused himself and Fitzpatrick's buddy (who was the assistant) appointed him.


8 posted on 10/25/2005 10:19:33 PM PDT by Prost1 (New AG, Berger is still free, copped a plea! I still get my news from FR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: scott says
Questions:

1. Who is the party that got to Valerie to have her "suggest" Joe should be their agent to Niger?

2. How much contact did Wilson have with Kerry (and or Dem Party Leaders) before his Niger trip. He had been sent there before...during the Clinton Administration.

3. Why no "non-disclosure agreement signed by Joe?

Why no written report signed by Joe?

Who created these CIA security lapses. It didn't come from the Whitehouse?

9 posted on 10/26/2005 7:12:05 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

bttt


10 posted on 10/28/2005 6:56:47 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson