Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Pinch and Judy Show
Special to FreeRepublic ^ | 25 October 2005 | John Armor (Congressman Billybob)

Posted on 10/25/2005 10:12:43 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob

Beginning in the Middle Ages, there was a widely popular puppet show called “Punch and Judy.” Most of its content and humor were based on two characters flailing away at each other with slap sticks. Today, we have a verbal equivalent of the same thing, occurring in the pages of the New York Times. These protagonists are Arthur (“Pinch”) Sulzberger Jr., boy-publisher of the Times, and Judith (“Judy”) Miller, one-time rising star writer for that paper.

Judy says she told the truth and upheld the values of the Times. Slap! Pinch says she misled her editors and brought the reputation of the Times into question. Slap! Slap! But unlike its medieval ancestor, the Pinch and Judy Show has four participants. And they are not evenly matched.

Like tag team wrestling matches when the referee is looking the other way, Judy is being attacked by three people at one time. In addition to Pinch, there is Bill (“Petrushka”) Keller, the editor of the Times, and Maureen (“Cruella”) Dowd, who is Don Rickles in drag for those who like to think - or think they think - and sneer, rather than get the gag and laugh.

Bill Keller has weighed in with comments that Judy has “drifted” into covering stories she’d been removed from, and that she has “misled” the editors of the paper. Slap! Slap! Slap! “Drifted”? Isn’t it part of the job description of an Editor in Chief to keep the staff from drifting?

But the biggest whacks are taken by Maureen. In her column, “Woman of Mass Destruction,” she says that Judy has a “peculiar mixture of hard work and hauteur,” that she is “in need of a tight editorial leash, [but] was kept on no leash at all,” and implies that she in part slept her way to the top by calling her “the Fourth Estate's Becky Sharp.” Slap! Slap! Slap! Slap!

Since the Times in its infinite wisdom has sought to make Internet users pay for access to the screeds of its stable of literary egos, Maureen’s column is now theoretically unavailable for free on the Internet. Thanks to the efforts of a blogger known as Peking Duck, here is that column:

Source: http://www.pekingduck.org/archives/003038.php#003038

Is this whole imbroglio merely a source of entertainment, like the original Punch and Judy Show? Not that pure slap stick is an unworthy purpose. That Show led to vaudeville, the Three Stooges, Chevy Chase and Gerald Ford, among others. Surely that’s a greater contribution to Western Civilization than the collected works of Professor Noam Chomsky, for instance.

But there is a real point in the Pinch and Judy Show. Judy went to jail for 85 days to “protect her sources,” and thereby to protect all reporters, all newspapers, and truth, justice and the American way. But after a pas de deux about the adequacy of her releases from her sources, she rolled the stone away from her tomb and came out and testified that she “didn’t know” who gave her the name of Valerie Plame, wife of discredited Ambassador Joe Wilson.

Hellooo? Didn’t know? That doesn’t pass the sniff test, as we lawyers describe it. Truth is not yet on the table. And it may or may not be, when prosecutor Fitzgerald issues his indictments, vel non, on Friday. It may take some time to get to the bottom of this story. And based on its coverage so far, the Times will probably be the last to report it, even though the facts are already inside its own walls.

As for the title of this piece, it is perfect. The credit goes not to me, but to Leni, known on the Internet as MinuteGal, who came up with it.

John_Armor@aya.yale.edu


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: arthursulzburger; billkeller; joewilson; judithmiller; minutegal; newyorktimes; pekingduck; punchandjudy; slapstick; valerieplame
I think y'all will enjoy my latest contribution to Newsbusters. Special thanks to MinuteGal, who came up with the perfect title, which inspired me to write this article to go under it.

John / Billybob

1 posted on 10/25/2005 10:12:45 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
Leni,

Without the inspiration of your absolutely perfect title, I wouldn't have written this. Thank you very much. Due credit for you appears in the piece, as published on the Net.

John / Billybob
2 posted on 10/25/2005 10:14:48 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Quoted by Rush, again, this Thursday. Hoohah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Excellent!


3 posted on 10/25/2005 10:19:19 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Man, will the NYT reap a whirlwind of retribution when they cut Miller loose.
4 posted on 10/25/2005 10:19:29 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

To me, all at the NY Slimes are "Jayson Blairs".


5 posted on 10/25/2005 10:24:53 AM PDT by RasterMaster (Proud Member of the Water Bucket Brigade - Merry MOOSEMUSS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
John, you need to think this through. If it's necessary for a reporter to go to jail to protect an unnamed secret source, isn't it even more necessary for the reporter to go to jail to protect a source that's so secret, the reporter doesn't even know who the source is? If the reporter can't even be trusted to know the source, how can the reporter let the secret out to the public? The fact the the reporter doesn't know the source proves how important that source is!! /sarcasm off

This is like the old military document joke: "Confidential: Destroy Before Reading".

The utter fog and confusion of this whole case reminds me of the penultimate scene in "Absence of Malice", where Judge James J. Wells (Wilford Brimley) is called in to figure out what in the Good Christ (excuse me) is going on, and to get someone's ass in his briefcase.

6 posted on 10/25/2005 10:25:53 AM PDT by You Dirty Rats (Lashed to the USS George W. Bush: "Damn the Torpedos, Full Miers Ahead!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Thanks for the plaudits, Congressman. I appreciate your attribution.

My modesty is exceeded only by your many talents.

(.....wait, that doesn't come out quite right, does it......LOL).

Seriously, you're an outstanding freeper and one of our most gifted writers.

Leni

7 posted on 10/25/2005 12:03:16 PM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
...for those who like to think - or think they think...

Great!

8 posted on 10/25/2005 5:59:44 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson