Gun grabbers don't let facts stand in the wayThey never have, and never will. Lies and misinformation are the tools of the anti-gun left.
In her editorial "Gun trade, leaders off the hook again", Marie Cocco states: "With the stroke of President Bush's pen, the gun industry will have greater protection from lawsuits than a homeowner whose loose handrail leads to a trip-and-fall claim."
She (apparently) hopes to decieve the reader into believing the law will prevent product liability lawsuits, which are (as stated above) "An action for death, physical injuries or property damage resulting directly from a defect in design or manufacture of the product..."
In his article/editorial Firearms get unfair exemption, Dan K. Thomasson bemoans the fact that "the Houses decision to join the Senate in excluding the nations gun manufacturers from liability in most firearm-related deaths, lawmakers have done something they refused to do for any other industry, including tobacco and asbestos."
How one compares guns with asbestos is beyond me.
But then, I don't possess the twisted mind of an anti-gun zealot.
1 posted on
10/25/2005 7:21:40 AM PDT by
holymoly
To: holymoly
How one compares guns with asbestos is beyond me. Just imagine holding up the local 7-11 with a roll of asbestos.
( Hey, it could happen. One guy tried it with a zucchini. )
2 posted on
10/25/2005 7:28:32 AM PDT by
thulldud
(It's bad luck to be superstitious.)
To: holymoly
wait a sec, i thought it was the senate bill that went, not the house bill? the senate bill had the crap, the house bill was clean.
or have i just gotten myself confused here?
4 posted on
10/25/2005 7:33:38 AM PDT by
absolootezer0
("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
To: holymoly
I confess I didn't bother to read what the Times had to say editorially after the House passed HR 800 on ThursdayActually the House didn't pass HR 800 on Thursday, they passed S 397.
5 posted on
10/25/2005 7:35:46 AM PDT by
P8riot
(When they come for your guns, give them the bullets first.)
To: holymoly
The anti gun lobby reminds me of Cindy Sheehan. Both are "victims", Sheehan loosing her son, Brady shot on the attempt on Reagan's life. They both can say whatever they want in favor of their cause and against their opponent and the MSM laps it up like a cat at the cream.
Where are the streets "running with blood" we were going to see after the expiration of the assault weapons ban? Remember that one? There was to be lawlessness everywhere. When concealed carry laws were enacted the "shootout at the OK Corral" was the next thing to happen. When Florida passed laws allowing citizens to protect their property, tourists were told they were fair game. Seems to me there are a lot less dead tourists than there were when the rent a carjackings were taking place a few years ago. Yes, I admit the marking system for rental cars has changed, but now the bad guys (the real reason for crime) don't know who may be armed.
The media keep portraying the NRA as this giant monster that is the lap dog for the gun industry. In truth, 4 million gun rights supporters are what drive the NRA. Another testament as to why the MSM will never get it.
6 posted on
10/25/2005 7:38:45 AM PDT by
Burf
(We'll all be drinkin that free Bubble Up and eatin that Rainbow Stew.)
To: holymoly
9 posted on
10/25/2005 7:49:39 AM PDT by
P8riot
(When they come for your guns, give them the bullets first.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson