Skip to comments.
21st Century Bank Run: Watching a $4 billion company fall apart in a week
msn.com ^
| 17 October 2005
| Daniel Gross
Posted on 10/23/2005 5:39:12 PM PDT by Axhandle
If you want to know what a modern bank run looks like, consider the case of the giant commodity trading firm Refco. It went public in mid-August, but in the course of the past week it has gone from $4 billion stock-market darling to carcass. The proximate cause of the meltdown was the surprise disclosure on Monday, Oct. 10, that an entity controlled by CEO Phillip Bennett had owed $430 million to the company. A week later, trading of the stock has been halted and vultures are picking over Refco the way hyenas gnaw on the remains of wildebeest. Refco was no boiler-room operation. It's been around and successful for a long time. (Scandal connoisseurs will recall that Refco was Hillary Clinton's commodities broker.) And it had been getting more and more respectable. First, Thomas H. Lee, the highly respected private equity investor, agreed to take a big stake in Refco in the summer of 2004. Then gold-plated underwriters Goldman Sachs and Credit Suisse First Boston brought it public two months ago. Refco was a model 21st-century businessa highly digitized, high-tech services company that traded complicated financial instruments on behalf of customers all over the globe. But its meltdown shows that its real assets were not its New Economy algorithms and brainpower. Rather, this extremely modern company depended ultimately on the kind of assets that built American capitalism in the 19th century: trust, integrity, and the personal reputation of executives. Nothing material changed in Refco's financial situation when it announced that Bennett had secretly owed money to the company, or when it provided more details the next day about how Bennett had hid the debt. If anything, the company's situation improved, since Bennett paid the money back and quit the same day.
(Excerpt) Read more at slate.msn.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: paragraphsrrfriends; refco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
I was shocked to actually stumble across a decent article on msn.com. I'm not sure if slate.msn.com is related to the leftist slate website, but regardless this article raised some great free-market issues - about how the foundation for a successful business is trust, integrity, and competence, rather than shifty schiesters and exploitation of workers. Granted it discusses a business going down the tubes, but it explains why it happened and in the process highlights the fundamentals of successful businesses. This would almost make a good fable for a young kid beginning to learn about economics.
FYI - there are a bunch of hyperlinks in the text that don't show up when I post this at FR.
1
posted on
10/23/2005 5:39:13 PM PDT
by
Axhandle
To: Axhandle
(Scandal connoisseurs will recall that Refco was Hillary Clinton's commodities broker.)I'm shocked.
2
posted on
10/23/2005 5:46:24 PM PDT
by
b4its2late
(I saw a woman wearing a sweat shirt with "Guess" on it. So I said "Implants?" She hit me.)
To: b4its2late
Thanks I had forgotten that. But the headline is misleading, as the company was not a bank.
3
posted on
10/23/2005 5:49:59 PM PDT
by
stockpirate
(John Kerry & FBI files ==> http://www.freerepublic.com/~stockpirate/)
To: A. Pole; dennisw; neutrino; ninenot; hedgetrimmer; Willie Green
Refco was a model 21st-century businessa highly digitized, high-tech services company that traded complicated financial instruments on behalf of customers all over the globe. But its meltdown shows that its real assets were not its New Economy algorithms and brainpower. Rather, this extremely modern company depended ultimately on the kind of assets that built American capitalism in the 19th century: trust, integrity, and the personal reputation of executives.
4
posted on
10/23/2005 5:50:32 PM PDT
by
raybbr
To: Axhandle
refco's failure, though shocking in its speed, is equally awesome for its orderliness and nothing could be further from a "bank run" than what happened at Refco. Very few, VERY few of their futures accounts have flown and that business will apparently be picked up by another going concern about as seamlessly as possible.
The sorts of sensationalism that swirls around things like this are really nauseating.
5
posted on
10/23/2005 5:54:05 PM PDT
by
the invisib1e hand
(I must be a little punk, because coffeebreak said so.)
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: Axhandle; Toddsterpatriot
Thanks Ax, the writer simplified enough that even my grandkid could understand.
Toddster what's your take on this?
7
posted on
10/23/2005 5:56:13 PM PDT
by
investigateworld
(Abortion stops a beating heart)
To: Axhandle
What happened to all the accounts of individual traders? Did they recover all the funds in their accounts?
8
posted on
10/23/2005 5:59:14 PM PDT
by
John123
(The Democrats want to choose the Judges. Who died and made them boss?)
To: investigateworld
Nothing material changed in Refco's financial situation when it announced that Bennett had secretly owed money to the company, or when it provided more details the next day about how Bennett had hid the debt.This is incorrect. The $430 million in hidden losses made Refco look more profitable than it really was. If a stock trades at a certain P/E ratio and you find out the E portion of the equation was a lie, you have a problem.
I'd call 8 or more years of earnings lies a material change in their financial situation.
9
posted on
10/23/2005 6:08:49 PM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(If you agree with Marx, Krugman and the New York Times please stop calling yourself a conservative!!)
To: Axhandle
Just a minor note, but I hadn't recalled this little detail: "(Scandal connoisseurs will recall that Refco was Hillary Clinton's commodities broker.)"
10
posted on
10/23/2005 6:14:19 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Toddsterpatriot
They must have taken lessons from the Cintoons.
11
posted on
10/23/2005 6:15:41 PM PDT
by
snowman1
To: Axhandle
It was a trading company, not a bank. The company was powered by the Clinton school of economics. Refco's assets were based on valuation based on book cooking rather than hard currency. Its demise was so swift because investors knew Refco couldn't pay actual debts or cover assets with virtual cash.
12
posted on
10/23/2005 6:18:36 PM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(They're Not Conservative Enough! Get a Rope so We Can Hang Ourselves!)
To: Axhandle
Did Refco have Chicago roots?
13
posted on
10/23/2005 6:23:10 PM PDT
by
Thebaddog
(K9 Bmine)
To: Axhandle
It's bad enough when the CEO hides hundreds of millions in debts. But the worse part of what happened at Refco, and what took them down in the eyes of customers, was the public admission (a necessary admission of course) that their accounting was tainted going all the way back to at least 2002.
14
posted on
10/23/2005 6:23:50 PM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(Take the high road. You'll never have to meet a Democrat.)
To: doug from upland
(Scandal connoisseurs will recall that Refco was Hillary Clinton's commodities broker.)Ping.
15
posted on
10/23/2005 6:25:15 PM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(In DC, Pork is what's for dinner)
To: Axhandle
And it had been getting more and more respectable.This is also true. Many honest and ethical people worked hard toward that goal. All to have it taken down by a couple of slick greedy executives.
16
posted on
10/23/2005 6:26:24 PM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(Take the high road. You'll never have to meet a Democrat.)
To: cake_crumb
That was the philosophy that Clinton had done away with the market cycles. Just make up the numbers you want and by the time it all shakes out, you'll be off on retirement living the good life.
17
posted on
10/23/2005 6:32:23 PM PDT
by
Burf
(We'll all be drinkin that free Bubble Up and eatin that Rainbow Stew.)
To: b4its2late
18
posted on
10/23/2005 6:38:15 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
To: Axhandle
I personally like that bit about Hillary's cattle futures. "...and it had improved it's reputation..."
LMAO
Yeah, from scurvey bottom, everything is up!
To: Thebaddog
Did Refco have Chicago roots?I believe they started in the South. They do have offices here in Chicago.
20
posted on
10/23/2005 6:46:06 PM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(If you agree with Marx, Krugman and the New York Times please stop calling yourself a conservative!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson