Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Out in Cold in UNESCO Diversity Pact
ap on Yahoo ^ | 10/20/05 | Joelle Diderich - ap

Posted on 10/20/2005 5:46:49 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

PARIS - UNESCO's member nations voted overwhelmingly Thursday to approve a pact on protecting cultural diversity after a bitter debate left the United States isolated in opposition to what it sees as a threat to sales of American movies and music.

The convention — championed by the European Union and Canada — aims to promote ethnic traditions and minority languages and to protect those local cultures from the negative effects of globalization, UNESCO said.

The United States argued the convention could be used to erect trade barriers against cultural exports such as films and pop music as well as indirectly curtail free speech.

Calling the text "deeply flawed," the U.S. delegation proposed 28 amendments to the draft, but all were rejected. Delegates voted 148-2 to approve the pact. The United States and Israel opposed it and four nations abstained.

U.S. Ambassador Louise Oliver told the meeting the text was "too open to misinterpretation and too prone to abuse for us to support."

The dispute left the United States isolated just two years after it rejoined the U.N. cultural agency following a 19-year absence over wide-ranging disagreements with UNESCO.

Oliver called the outcome "extraordinarily disappointing" and said it could have lasting consequences on relations between the U.S. government and UNESCO, although she stopped short of threatening a new withdrawal.

"I would say that we're not currently considering any such possibilities, but obviously this process is going to raise some questions that will have to be discussed when I get back to Washington," she said in an interview.

UNESCO's biannual general conference did reach consensus agreements for a declaration on bioethics and a convention against doping in sports, but U.S. officials said other members weren't willing to compromise on the cultural diversity pact.

"This convention is different. It has been handled differently. It does not have the process of dialogue and openness and transparency that the others have had," Oliver told The Associated Press.

Britain, speaking on behalf of the EU because it holds the rotating presidency of the 25-nation bloc, said Monday that there had been ample debate on the convention and urged UNESCO members to approve the text without changes.

Timothy Craddock, the British ambassador to UNESCO, hailed the text's passage Thursday.

"With this convention, cultural diversity, currently under threat particularly in the poorest countries, will become a right we all share," he said. "Just as much as we shall all share the duty to preserve it."

The convention needs to be ratified separately by 30 member states.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: diversity; nations; outincold; pact; states; unesco; united

1 posted on 10/20/2005 5:46:50 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

What movie has been produced in the last ten years would be worth fighting over on the world stage?


2 posted on 10/20/2005 6:05:19 PM PDT by Thebaddog (Are you a dog, too?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

U.S. out of the U.N.!


3 posted on 10/20/2005 6:06:00 PM PDT by NapkinUser ("It is a damn poor mind indeed which can think of only one way to spell a word." -Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
What movie has been produced in the last ten years would be worth fighting over on the world stage?

Mel Gibson's "Passion of the Christ"?

4 posted on 10/20/2005 6:10:00 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

They want to protect the culture of everyone but Americans and they want us to pay for it.


5 posted on 10/20/2005 6:10:46 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson