Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State spending cap. Setting our budget priorities. Stop spending more than we earn.
SFC ^ | Oct. 13, 2005 | Tom Campbell

Posted on 10/15/2005 2:12:46 PM PDT by FairOpinion

Because we haven't been living within our means, we've spent more than we have taken in each of the last six years. We've tapped out our state credit card, raided funds intended for schools and roads, and now bump along with the worst bond-rating of the 50 states, which costs us hundreds of millions of dollars in extra interest every year. The tired, defeatist answer is: Just raise taxes. But we've spent more than we have received in taxes every year for the last six years. Why do we expect the Legislature wouldn't do so again?

There is a better way. Prop. 76 requires that state expenditures grow more smoothly. Rather than allowing a one-time spike in income to add to permanent-spending formulas, Prop. 76 specifies that the state can only increase its spending over the previous fiscal year by a percentage equal to the previous three years' revenue growth. We're still paying for having put our spending into high-gear based on one-time money at the end of the 1990s. This will stop that. If we have a windfall one year, the extra revenue will go into a reserve to be available for use when a year of exceptionally low revenue occurs.

Prop. 76 walls off the "special funds" that have routinely been raided when the state was spending more than it had. The sales tax we pay on gasoline, for instance, was intended for road building and maintenance; instead, it's been regularly raided for the state's general fund. That would stop.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; calinitiatives; capropositions; noon76; prop76; schwarzenegger; specialelection; yeson76
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 last
To: FairOpinion; calcowgirl; SierraWasp; NormsRevenge; Carry_Okie; Amerigomag; FOG724
We already know what calcowgirl's votes are on all of the Propositions. There is no need for you to repeat it over and over again. She has made no secret of it, has discussed her reasoning, and has supported her position with detailed research and analysis, all of which she has shared with us.

You, on the other hand, have behaved more like a GOP Big Tent RINO, liberal or moderate, endlessly parroting the Arnold line no matter what rational counter arguments may show. When challenged, your reaction is always to proclaim the opposition a tool of the democrats.

You're not doing your side (CAGOP Big Tent RINOs) much good.

81 posted on 10/16/2005 1:15:24 PM PDT by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Czar

FO is succeeding in one thing: trashing every thread to limit any meaningful discussion.


82 posted on 10/16/2005 1:35:04 PM PDT by calcowgirl (CA Special Election: Yes, Yes, Yes, No, No, No, No, No!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Czar

Bravo!!!


83 posted on 10/16/2005 2:08:41 PM PDT by FOG724 (http://gravenimagemusic.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: calex59; calcowgirl
"Thanks for posting the info on Prop 76. I have been wondering about that one. Now I know."

====

The ONLY thing you know from reading calcowgirl's post against Prop. 76, is her opinion. Ask yourself, is Calcowgirl right, while the entire Republican party and noted conservatives, such as Tom McClintock, and Ray Haynes WRONG?

The Republican Party, the Howard Jarvis Tax Association SUPPORT Prop. 76, while the Democrat Party, the Unions and calcowgirl are opposing it.

You may want to think twice which group of birds you want to flock with.

====

McClintock's recommendations for CA Propositions
Summary of Recommendations on the CA Propositions by various organizations and parties

84 posted on 10/16/2005 5:50:57 PM PDT by FairOpinion (CA Props: Vote for Reform: YES on 73-78, NO on 79 & 80, NO on Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Yada... Yada... Yada... Phhhhht!!!


85 posted on 10/16/2005 9:17:20 PM PDT by SierraWasp (The only thing that can save CA is making eastern CA the 51st state called Sierra Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson