Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pot law backers draw flak
Rocky Mountain News ^ | 10/14/2005 | Alan Gathright

Posted on 10/14/2005 7:36:14 AM PDT by cryptical

Backers of a Denver ballot measure to legalize marijuana for adults were accused Thursday of exploiting crime fears and deceiving voters.

A pro-pot group, Change the Climate, on Monday plans to unveil three billboards around Denver showing a battered woman with her male abuser behind her and the slogan:

"Reduce family and community violence in Denver. Vote Yes on I-100."

Nowhere does the ad mention that Initiative 100's passage would amend Denver law to make it legal for adults to possess 1 ounce or less of marijuana.

Earlier this week, Denver Councilman Charlie Brown blasted I-100's sponsor, Safer Alternative for Enjoyable Recreation - or SAFER - for campaign signs that declare: "Make Denver SAFER, Voter Yes on I-100."

Brown said the slogan is designed to fool residents into thinking the measure on the Nov. 1 ballot is about highly publicized efforts to combat rising crime and falling arrest rates by boosting police staffing.

He was so furious because the red-and-white signs were illegally scattered in his Observatory Park neighborhood and along street medians that he spent an hour Saturday yanking them out.

Now a political analyst and an activist who fights domestic violence are criticizing the billboard sponsor for using the emotionally charged image of the brutalized woman with a black eye to "distort" the goals of the pot legalization campaign and exploit Denver residents' fear about growing crime and police understaffing.

All political advertisers are "pretty liberal with the truth" as they strive to grab people's attention and deliver the message, said veteran Denver pollster Floyd Ciruli on Thursday. "But this is probably on the very far edge . . . in terms of a political accuracy and honesty.

"They're not even identifying what the issue is at all."

And while the group could make a strong argument for its central claim - that adult marijuana is a safer alternative than violence-fueling alcohol - the billboard's message "is pretty distorting," Ciruli added.

But Change the Climate founder Joe White said the Greenfield, Mass., nonprofit group's Denver billboards reflect dozens of marijuana-reform advertising campaigns it has run from California to Washington, D.C.

He said his group independently spent less than $10,000 to post the billboards in support of the I-100 campaign. One billboard will be at Santa Fe Drive and Alameda Avenue, another will be outside Invesco Field at Mile High and a third will be at 5500 Colorado Blvd.

The goal, White said, is to get political leaders to rethink the wasteful expenditure of $50 billion nationwide to combat nonviolent marijuana users, when many American cities are hard-pressed to fund police, fire, libraries and other social services.

"Our ad is seeking to stimulate debate and raise new ideas for political leaders to consider in an era of extremely tight and almost nonexistent funding for social services," White said Thursday.

But Councilman Brown said the billboard sponsors are using the smoke screen of domestic violence to mislead voters.

"Domestic violence is not on the ballot," Brown said. "Why can't they be grown-up about this issue and be straight with the Denver voters?

"If you want a marijuana initiative, use the 'M' word. Don't hide behind these other issues. Yeah, alcohol causes problems, there's absolutely no doubt. But alcohol is not on the ballot, and alcohol is a legal drug."

White said the group isn't hiding its pro-pot message.

He said the billboard directs people to its Web site where "you'll see (their marijuana reform crusade) front and center."

The head of the Yes-on-100 campaign, SAFER's Mason Tvert, defended the billboard's imagery, even though his group wasn't involved in crafting it.

"The fact of the matter is, if people used marijuana instead of alcohol, fewer crimes, instances of domestic violence, fights and traffic fatalities would occur," he said.

"This is a more honest campaign than any you will ever see."

Randy Saucedo, advocacy director for the Colorado Coalition Against Domestic Violence, issued a sharp rebuke of the billboards.

"I find it pretty offensive that we're getting some out-of-state types trying to further their goal by masking the tragedy of domestic violence, when the issue has nothing to do with domestic violence," Saucedo said.

"I find it very appalling, especially that they're deceiving the voters of Denver."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: bongbrigade; dontbogartthatjoint; dopesmokingdopes; ijustwannagethighman; supportingterrorists; waytogomorons; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
Next thing you know, the politicians will demand a monopoly on misleading the public.
1 posted on 10/14/2005 7:36:15 AM PDT by cryptical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cryptical
Yeah, its dishonest. Personally, I do think marijuana should be legalized. Its no more addicting than alcohol or tobacco. And prosecuting marijuana medicine patients makes no sense whatsoever to me.

(Denny Crane: "I like nature. Don't talk to me about the environment".)
2 posted on 10/14/2005 7:39:45 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cryptical
the politicians will demand a monopoly on misleading the public.

I think they've had the monopoly for quite some time. Just desperately trying to protect it anymore.

3 posted on 10/14/2005 7:40:26 AM PDT by krshnbrn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Individual Rights in NJ

You know, I think a lot of people would.

I hate alcohol in nearly any form (except someone mentioned Creme de Menthe erlier...mmmmmmmmmmm Oh an Bailiey)

And as a FORMER pot smoker I agree 100% that it is less harmful than drinking. The problem with pot is the peopoe who smkoe it all day every day- imagin if you DRANK that much- you would be sick alcoholic.


5 posted on 10/14/2005 8:25:12 AM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Individual Rights in NJ

geez- I look like I was stoned when I wrote that previous post- I REALLY need to actually do a preview before I post...


7 posted on 10/14/2005 8:56:28 AM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Individual Rights in NJ
I I don't really drink either, in fact I don't keep alchohal in the house,

Coulda fooled me . ; > )

8 posted on 10/14/2005 8:59:51 AM PDT by ActionNewsBill ("In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cryptical

Well, considering they made it illegal in the first place with outright lies and racist propaganda, it seems turnabout is fair play.


9 posted on 10/14/2005 9:00:43 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cryptical
"A pro-pot group, Change the Climate ..."

Change the Climate? Even that is misleading -- sounds like an environmental group.

(Oh no, robertpaulsen, we're referring to the political climate. Uh-huh.)

10 posted on 10/14/2005 9:08:51 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
You're not saying our current laws are based on outright lies and racist propaganda, are you?

These are current ads, you know.

11 posted on 10/14/2005 9:10:47 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cryptical
TEXT OF PROPOSED INITIATIVE
(proposed addition in all caps, underlined)
Amend Art. 5, Div. 3, Sec. 38-175 (Revised Municipal Code)
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person UNDER THE AGE OF TWENTY-ONE (21) to possess one (1) ounce or less of
marihuana. If such person is under the age of eighteen (18) years of age at the time of the offense, no jail sentence shall
be imposed and any fine imposed may be supplanted by treatment as required by the court.

Stupid. So if you're under 21 and possess 2 ounces, it's legal.

12 posted on 10/14/2005 9:18:07 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

Many of our current drug laws are based on outright lies and racist propaganda, yes.


13 posted on 10/14/2005 9:22:48 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Stupid. So if you're under 21 and possess 2 ounces, it's legal.

That's funny! The new law makes it illegal for kids to not have pot on them!
14 posted on 10/14/2005 9:24:37 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
"The new law makes it illegal for kids to not have pot on them!"

To not have enough pot on them.

15 posted on 10/14/2005 9:27:22 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
"Many of our current drug laws are based on outright lies and racist propaganda, yes."

Well, I was referring to the Controlled Substances Act of 1970, under which our current federal laws are written.

But I'd be interested in hearing about some of the laws to which you're referring.

16 posted on 10/14/2005 9:30:06 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

Illegal to posess one ounce or less. 0 ounces is less than one. So technically, if a child posesses 0 ounces of pot, that's less than one, so the child is in violation of the law. Awesome!


17 posted on 10/14/2005 10:14:55 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Racist propaganda was used to ban pot. Posters and films stated clearly that if your daughter smoked pot, she would begin to have urges to have sex with black jazz musicians.

The the controlled substances act is a lie in and of itself. It classifies pot and heroin in the same category and states neither have any medical use.

The WOD has accomplished nothing except to grow government and degrade the Bill of Rights.
18 posted on 10/14/2005 10:19:10 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

That's pretty messed up. They should have waited for the bong rips until AFTER they wrote the initiative! Yikes.


19 posted on 10/14/2005 10:20:03 AM PDT by adaven (http://www.red-dawn.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

I stand corrected.


20 posted on 10/14/2005 11:11:56 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson