Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NEVADA DESERT: Computers, start your engines; Stanford team apparent winners in robot car race
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | October 9th, 2005 | Tom Abate

Posted on 10/09/2005 11:52:52 AM PDT by Shuttle Shucker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: John Jamieson

The Russian Soyuz costs nearly 30 times less, and has a much better safety rate than the Shuttle.

The bureaucrats and other statists (liberals like yourself, it would seem) counter that the Shuttle has more bells & whistles.

Fiscal conservatives in the know counter that they don't justify the exorbitant price or safety risks.


41 posted on 10/09/2005 3:23:35 PM PDT by Shuttle Shucker (At $600 million per flight, 25 times more than what a Soyuz costs, ain't it a bargain?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: wyattearp



The last time I checked, the USA's a democracy. NASA has finally responded today by offering launch-related competitive prizes:

http://www.space.com/news/051009_xprize_challenge.html

What took it so long (nearly 5 decades)? Surely self-preservation had NOTHING to do with it.


42 posted on 10/09/2005 3:25:49 PM PDT by Shuttle Shucker (At $600 million per flight, 25 times more than what a Soyuz costs, ain't it a bargain?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Shuttle Shucker
I'm confused: is it 30 or 25 times more expensive?

Soyuz cost per pound is actually higher than Shuttle.

Most experts put Soyuz launch cost at $75 million. It carries less than half as many people, and no where near the Shuttle's 50,000 pound payload.

Do some research before typing please.
43 posted on 10/09/2005 3:57:43 PM PDT by John Jamieson (Hybrids are a highway around CAFE, that's all they're good for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Shuttle Shucker

NASA has always supported university and private industry research. You don't have the slightest understanding of what you're talking about.


44 posted on 10/09/2005 4:00:33 PM PDT by John Jamieson (Hybrids are a highway around CAFE, that's all they're good for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Shuttle Shucker

Update on Soyuz Payload: Zero is the correct number if 3 crew members on board.

4 Soyuz deaths (haven't found total passengers yet). Two other failed missions.


45 posted on 10/09/2005 4:24:33 PM PDT by John Jamieson (Hybrids are a highway around CAFE, that's all they're good for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: trickyricky

I'm for you.

However, these kind of things that they test for the military and others, you have to wonder what kind of use they'll put them to in the civilian world.


46 posted on 10/09/2005 5:11:25 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Shuttle Shucker
The last time I checked, the USA's a democracy.

Then you've never checked. The USA is not a democracy. It is a Representative Republic.

47 posted on 10/09/2005 5:28:09 PM PDT by wyattearp (The best weapon to have in a gunfight is a shotgun - preferably from ambush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: trickyricky

Meanwhile, the sad news would be that UGVs will need fuel to drive as their lunch, and maintenance for their sleep. These UGVs will go on strike when not enough maintenance are made. Let's hope they won't strike in middle of the battle field. By the way, the good news would be that there will be no such labour unions setup by the UGVs.


48 posted on 10/10/2005 8:08:51 AM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson

>>>NASA has always supported university and private industry research. You don't have the slightest understanding of what you're talking about.<<<

There's a difference between doling out academic pork in exchange for academic sycophantism, and putting up competitive prizes that the best academic contestants can win. NASA does lots of the former (with our tax dollars) and too little of the latter.


49 posted on 10/10/2005 8:34:28 PM PDT by Shuttle Shucker (At $600 million per flight, 25 times more than what a Soyuz costs, ain't it a bargain?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Shuttle Shucker
Now that know that comparing the Shuttle to the Soyuz is ridiculous, I respectfully request that you change your tagline to something less misleading. That way I won't have to follow you all around the forums correcting you.
50 posted on 10/10/2005 9:15:22 PM PDT by John Jamieson (Hybrids are a highway around CAFE, that's all they're good for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson

Dennis Tito paid for nearly the entire Soyuz launch for nearly 30 times less than the cost of a Shuttle launch, and he actually made it back safely. Your only "rebuttal" appears to be an unproven assertion (and a self-serving one at that). If you ever have a legitimate correction as opposed to a self-serving insult (assuaging your feelings of guilt at having profited from that mega-waste of tax dollars), I'll take your requests more seriously. Until then, your posts buttress my claims that (for example) monopolies aren't good for society, and neither are those living on retirement income derived from them. Good riddance, Sir.


51 posted on 10/16/2005 7:38:49 PM PDT by Shuttle Shucker (At $600 million per flight, 25 times more than what a Soyuz costs, ain't it a bargain?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: wyattearp
"The last time I checked, the USA's a democracy."

"Then you've never checked.
The USA is not a democracy."

You're absolutely right

We are a Constitutional Republic.

And somebody ought to tell the stinking politicians in D.C.
including our fearless leader.

I've heard him call us a democracy on more than one occasion.

52 posted on 10/23/2005 2:07:13 PM PDT by trickyricky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: trickyricky

We are moving more and more toward democracy (aka mob rule) all the time. The constitution was amended to take the election of the presidency away from the congress. It was then amended to take the election of senators away from the states.

The election of the presidency was a beautiful form of term limits. Don't like the president? Fire your congresscritter. Same thing with senators. Don't like your state's US senator? Fire the members of your state legislature or state assembly. Term limits were natural to the original structure of our government.

Our government worked fine, as designed. Unfortunately for the citizens of this country, it didn't work fine for the scumbags whose goal was to stay in office forever. Politicians have more power in a democracy than in a republic. They WANT a democracy, that's why they SAY it's a democracy.


53 posted on 10/24/2005 6:54:58 AM PDT by wyattearp (The best weapon to have in a gunfight is a shotgun - preferably from ambush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson