[Congressman Billybob]

Thanks to FreeRepublic in general, Doug from Upland and Peter Paul personally, for cluing me in on the critical aspect of the Hillary! 2000 which the Washington Post utterly missed in its article today.

Armed with that information, I posted this on Newsbusters.org minutes ago.

Enjoy, as much as you can enjoy any article about Hillary that does not include a reference to her entry into Camp Cupcake (Martha Stewart's recent "alma mater").

John / Billybob

[Thumbellina]

Amen

[gondramB]

"The papers on Peter Paul’s civil suit against Hillary Clinton and others was served on both her and Rosen, before that final report was filed, under oath, with the FEC. The papers included receipts and copies of checks to prove the real cost of the Clinton Gala, as found as a fact by the FEC."

Looks like this would nail the Clinton campaign, unless they can successfully claim that the expense report wasn't accurate or that somehow the campaign was not responsible for those expenses - maybe by claiming Paul wasn't authorized to spend that money (or that much money)on behalf of the campaign.

This should be interesting. Have you sent it to Drudge?

[connectthedots]

witt didn't miss the story. She simply chose not to report it.

[lilylangtree]

Just another example of a clintoonian crony getting away with "murder".

[hosepipe]

Its true that in america some are a little more equal than others.. others are a lot more equal.. and yet others seem to beyond the law..

[concentric circles]

It will be great sport for the next year watching the press fall all over themselves promoting Hillary's candidacy and attempting to torpedo anything that looks like a threat.

The entertainment value comes from knowing that, by her own actions, she has already destroyed her chances for becoming a candidate and that it will be her own party who has to take her down.

In the entertainment world this is called "slapstick."

[cpdiii]

It’s a shame that the reporter utterly missed the very story that she was supposedly writing about.

The reporter did not miss the story. The reporter deliberately tried to hide the real story in convoluted screed deliberately designed to confuse the non politically astute. Her objective was to make the average voter confused about what really happened and to thus instill the idea of this is "just politics as usual." This is actually the Washington Posts attempt to put this issue in the past.

[Fester Chugabrew]

I don't see an April Witt on the staff at the Washington Post. At any rate, she was a good girl. There are rewards to be had in painting the Clintons with a favorable brush, and punishments to be rendered should one cross their path too closely.

Two-bit hillbilly thugs at work in the highest places. Who would've thought?

[The Spirit Of Allegiance]

"Had Ms. Witt done her job competently,"


Congressman, I must beg to respectfully disagree with you. Ms. Witt had half her twits about her and did her job most competently.

Unfortunately, her job was polishing 'RAT droppings, not journalism. She lives in denial if she privately considers herself anything other than a hack and a fraud.

[doug from upland]

Great work, John. 8,000 WORDS OF WHITEWASH

[montag813]

It's fun to ridicule the Post reporter over this story. But it accomplishes nothing. It was Gonzales' Justice Department which inexplicably yanked Peter Paul's videotaped evidence which by all accounts would have convicted Rosen for sure. Even the RAT-appointed judge was stunned by this surrender. Like the Sandy Berger wrist-slap for treason/conspiracy, it was yet another disturbing Bush Administration intervention to rescue the Clintons from certain doom. The question is WHY?

[ntnychik]

Peter Paul update: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/04/AR2005100401150.html

[Mia T]

"If the gloves don't fit, you must acquit." bump

Well done. The thought of a clinton in "Camp Cupcake," however, leaves me with a feeling of profound cognitive dissonance.

My original response to the announcement of the upcoming Post article:

Careful Doug...

When the Left assesses clintoncorruption (treason, rape, or whatever), a clown-like character of the crime or the criminal is the reliable default mitigating factor, with the magnitude of the mitigation directly proportional to both the intensity of clownlike affect and the seriousness of the crime and inversely related to the distance to an election in which a clinton is running.

We used to execute rapists and traitors. Today we elect them president?

sandy berger haberdashery feint
(the specs, not the pants or the socks)


by Mia T, 8.23.05


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

 

the MAD hillary series
WHY MISSUS CLINTON IS DANGEROUS
FOR THE CHILDREN,
FOR AMERICA,
FOR THE WORLD


madhillary.com (coming soon)
hillarytalks.blogspot.com
_{COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005}

MAD hillary series #1 ALFRED E."What, me worry?" CLINTON + CRAZY HIL MAD COVER STORY THE THREAT OF TERRORISM AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON TO OVAL OFFICE	MAD hillary series #2 HILLARY'S MIDDLE-FINGER MINDSET Do you really want THAT finger on the button?
MAD hillary series #3 "What, me worry?" THE THREAT OF TERRORISM AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON TO OVAL OFFICE	MAD hillary series #4 NANO-PRESIDENT the danger of the unrelenting smallness of bill + hillary clinton
MAD hillary series #5 SCHEMA PINOCCHIO how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor

 

 

38 posted on 10/07/2005 9:48:50 AM EDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))

[sandydipper]

People who walk on water - don't get wet feet.

[GOPJ]

It’s a shame that the reporter utterly missed the very story that she was supposedly writing about.

Missed? Gimme a break. A person has to work at "missing" on that level.

[OXENinFLA]

PING...

[OXENinFLA]

You may be able to ask her why she didn't mention the false FEC report and the court documents.

April Witt is a staff writer for the Magazine. She will be fielding questions and comments about this article Monday [10-10] at 1 p.m. at washingtonpost.com/liveonline.

I assume that's eastern time.

[Robert A Cook PE]

Does anyone in the mainstream press "research" independently any more?

In the OSU bombing, they say nothing, report nothing, because they claim that "nobody will talk officially" - Yet I thought they prided themselves as "reporters" not "repeaters".

Bush's biggest problem in DC is that he (and others!) puts out the conservative words, but the media filters it through their prejudices into democrat propaganda.

[doug from upland]

I guess April Witt is not winning a Pulitzer.

[prairiebreeze]

Excellent! Thank you, this is going out to my email list.