That is hardly a refutation of my argument. if my structure is incoherent, then you won't mind correcting it will you? Evolutionists have said that chimps and humans come from the same ancestor. Whether they use the word "must" or "may" or "most likely", their claim is illogical in any case, because the hypothesis is illogical. Period. Prove me wrong with logic, not ad hominems - you only discredit your positionm with such tactics. I am a seasoned debater not some amateur that you are used to. If you aren't up to the task, then just drop the bluster and stop responding.
You are babbling now. You already responded to my refutation. It is not your incoherence that was the basis of the refutation, but rather your false analogy. You did learn about that in Speech 101 did you not? Your initial premise is a false analogy, I need not bother with the rest.
Nice debate. But all you have to do is look at some bones and the DNA. It becomes clear pretty quick.
Ever sit in a roomfull of bones and arrange things so that they look right to you then compare your results with what others get? Great fun!