Nice debate. But all you have to do is look at some bones and the DNA. It becomes clear pretty quick.
Ever sit in a roomfull of bones and arrange things so that they look right to you then compare your results with what others get? Great fun!
A hypothesis has to be logical to be valid, and the chimp DNA hypothesis is illogical. It violates the laws of logic as I pointed out and no one has yet adequately answered the problem. Conclusion doesn't follow premise; law of the excluded middle applies; similar does not equate to identical (fallacy of equivocation). This is not science. That's 3 strikes and yerrrr out!