Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NY Times reporter Judith Miller released from jail
The Philadelphia Inquirer ^ | Posted on Thu, Sep. 29, 2005 | By John Shiffman and Steve Goldstein

Posted on 09/29/2005 4:29:05 PM PDT by grjr21

WASHINGTON - Judith Miller, The New York Times reporter who has been jailed since July 6 for refusing to identify a source, has been released, The Inquirer has learned.

Miller left an Alexandria, Va. jail late this afternoon, a jail official said.

She was released after she had a telephone conversation with the Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, I. Lewis Libby, sources said. In that conversation, Libby reaffirmed that he had released Miller from a promise of confidentiality more than a year ago, sources said.

The special prosecutor in the case, Patrick Fitzgerald, has sought to compel Miller to reveal her source to a grand jury investigating whether Bush administration officials leaked the name of a CIA covert officer, Valerie Plame.

A 1982 federal law makes it a crime to disclose the name of American covert agents.

Plame's husband, former ambassador Joseph Wilson, has said he believes his wife's name was leaked as part of an effort to discredit his criticsm of the Administration's build up to the war in Iraq.

Columnist Robert Novak's July 2003 column sparked the controversy by naming Plame as a CIA operative who worked on weapons-of-mass-destruction issues.

Prosecutors have interviewed President Bush and Cheney and the federal grand jury has taken testimony from senior Bush aides, including advisors Karl Rove and Libby.

In July, a federal judge ordered Miller jailed for refusing to testify about her sources before the grand jury. Miller never wrote an article about Plame.

It could not be immediately determined whether Miller has now agreed to testify.

The judge also threatened to jail Time Magazine reporter Matt Cooper, but Cooper was spared incarceration after agreeing to testify at the last minute, saying Rove had given him a personal release to identify him as a source.

A spokesman for Fitzgerald did not immediately return phone calls.

Libby's lawyer, Joseph A. Tate of Philadelphia, declined to comment.

Since July, Miller had been held in suburban Virginia at the Alexandria Detention Center. According to The Washington Post, her visitors included former NBC anchor Tom Brokaw, U.N. ambassador John R. Bolton and former senator Robert J. Dole (R-Kan.).


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: cialeak; judithmiller; nyt; okayilltalknow; plame; plamegate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last
"She was released after she had a telephone conversation with the Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, I. Lewis Libby, sources said.


Anyone have any idea of what this means ?

1 posted on 09/29/2005 4:29:09 PM PDT by grjr21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grjr21

Let me guess: Libby was her source.


2 posted on 09/29/2005 4:31:02 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grjr21

She was released from the confidentiality agreement and the prosecutors had already interviewed Libby. To me it sounds like nothing new, other than Miller trying to make this an Amendment issue when no protection is granted.


3 posted on 09/29/2005 4:32:18 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife ("Death is better, a milder fate than tyranny. "--Aeschylus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grjr21

Will she get her own Apprentice show?


4 posted on 09/29/2005 4:32:28 PM PDT by toddlintown (Your papers please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grjr21

Probably a repeat of the Matt Cooper thing -- she is now 'able' to testify.


5 posted on 09/29/2005 4:33:21 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grjr21

It means Miller could have testified since Libby waived confidentiality, but she decided to go to jail instead.


6 posted on 09/29/2005 4:33:33 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife

I would expect it means the case has come to an end, and we should be hearing from the special prosecutor soon; perhaps as early as tomorrow???


7 posted on 09/29/2005 4:33:38 PM PDT by Laverne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grjr21

Never could stand Miller.


8 posted on 09/29/2005 4:33:56 PM PDT by Rosemont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toddlintown

No Apprentice show, but she'll get lots of phony "freedom awards", and will command a modest five-figure speaking fee going forward.


9 posted on 09/29/2005 4:34:00 PM PDT by NativeNewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: grjr21
Libby reaffirmed that he had released Miller from a promise of confidentiality more than a year ago, sources said.

Ms. Miller appears to not be that bright.

10 posted on 09/29/2005 4:34:00 PM PDT by msnimje (Hurricane KATRINA - An Example of Nature's Enforcement of Eminent Domain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
In that conversation, Libby reaffirmed that he had released Miller from a promise of confidentiality more than a year ago, sources said.
11 posted on 09/29/2005 4:34:18 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: grjr21

>>>Anyone have any idea of what this means ?

Sure. A dumb.ass wasted all that time in the can for nothing... :)


12 posted on 09/29/2005 4:34:23 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laverne

The case has come to an end. Unless there is a reason to reconvene a grand jury yet another time.


13 posted on 09/29/2005 4:36:36 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife ("Death is better, a milder fate than tyranny. "--Aeschylus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

...and that people have quit paying attention to this whole hoopla which meant that if she didn't find a way out of this she was going to sit there for a really, really long time for no reason.


14 posted on 09/29/2005 4:36:41 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper; Shermy

Strange goings on...


15 posted on 09/29/2005 4:37:58 PM PDT by Dog (I can't give that information Chief in the open..... I demand the cone of silence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: grjr21
It could mean "no bill".

I'm glad she's out. She's a good reporter.

16 posted on 09/29/2005 4:38:07 PM PDT by HAL9000 (Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
"and will command a modest five-figure speaking fee going forward."


I think you may be onto something there a couple of month's in the federal pen a book deal speaking fees , could be worth seven figures
17 posted on 09/29/2005 4:38:48 PM PDT by grjr21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: grjr21

To me, it means she had the release all along, and decided to grandstand to appear the victim in defense of the first A.


18 posted on 09/29/2005 4:39:32 PM PDT by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grjr21

It means nothing. It is a red herring, a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention.

She's not that dumb to have sat in jail for nothing.


19 posted on 09/29/2005 4:39:54 PM PDT by i_dont_chat (Houston, TX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grjr21
"...Libby reaffirmed that he had released Miller from a promise of confidentiality more than a year ago, sources said. "

So, what's the point of going to jail? Wanted to reaffirm her relationship to Big Molly? Thought the time off from work would be nice? Or was it just the cuisine?

20 posted on 09/29/2005 4:40:44 PM PDT by MizSterious (Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson