Posted on 09/20/2005 11:23:00 AM PDT by kddid
Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid has told associates he intends to oppose confirmation of John Roberts as chief justice, Senate sources said Tuesday as rank and file Democrats began staking out positions on the man named to succeed the late William H. Rehnquist.
Reid scheduled a speech on the Senate floor for mid-afternoon, at which he was expected to make his announcement public.
Roberts has strong Republican support and appears headed for easy confirmation.
As party leader, Reid had urged fellow Democrats not to announce their positions until the conclusion of last week's confirmation hearings for Roberts.
By stating his own position first, Reid likely would set the stage for strong Democratic opposition to the 50-year-old appeals court judge and former Reagan administration lawyer.
Reid's office declined comment. The sources who described his intention did so on condition of anonymity, saying they did not want to pre-empt the speech.
Senate Democrats, including the eight Democrats on the Judiciary Committee, met privately during the day to discuss the nomination, which has drawn strong opposition from critics who argue that Roberts might vote to overturn a 1973 ruling that established the constitutional right to an abortion. Civil rights organizations also oppose Roberts' confirmation, citing some of the positions he took as a lawyer with the Reagan administration and his refusal to disavow them at confirmation hearings.
The Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to vote on the nomination on Thursday. The panel includes 10 Republicans and eight Democrats - two of whom are members of the party's leadership. The outcome of that vote is expected to serve as a preview of the level of bipartisan support Roberts can command in the Senate.
The AFL-CIO, the nation's largest labor federation, and the Service Employees International Union, which has 1.8 million union members, both announced their opposition to Roberts during the day as critics mounted a last-minute effort to discourage Democrats from voting for him.
"The record available to us at this time does not allow us to say with any degree of confidence that Judge Roberts has an understanding of, or commitment to, protecting the hard-fought rights and protections of working families, including their right to equal opportunity," said AFL-CIO President John Sweeney.
The Congressional Black Caucus, which is made up of the House's African American lawmakers and Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., also announced its opposition.
"Judge Roberts' civil rights record and views remained the most controversial and unexplained part of his record when the Judiciary Committee hearing concluded, just as his civil rights record and views had been the most controversial part of his record when the hearing began," said Rep. Mel Watt, D-N.C., the CBC's leader.
No tag needed.
I'm SHOCKED!
what a jack-ass that guy is..
"I am Jack's total lack of surprise."
When they oppose what should be a slam dunk nomination like this, it simply points out to their electorate how out of touch with reality they are.
Good Gravy Man, We're Doomed.
In other news:
* Pope found to be Catholic
* Dean found to be moron
* MSM found to be liberal
Film at 11!
In other news, Generalissimo Francisco Franco is STILL dead..
Well, knock me over with a feather...
Best thing to do is ignore them...and get on with the vote and next candidate...
just another dc dem loser.
Why should it get any of us down? Reid's the one who ends up looking like an obstructionist. All mainstream America knows that Roberts is a perfectly good choice. I've even heard some of my liberal relatives say he's acceptable.
..what a jack-ass that guy is..
-----
And that is being kind. All the libs are buttheads.
Let's just say we reject Dingy Harry...and isn't it strange it is not the Marxist Medusa standing and rejecting this right-wing extremist nominee??? Why that is downright Constitutional! Horrors!!!
Yes, they needed their token goat to feed the slop to the lib kool-aid drinkers, so Harry drew the short straw...
Dingy Harry is a typical liberal moonbat ~ Bump!
Is this the "extraordinary circumstances" that the Senate Judiciary pubs and demoncRATS negotiated so that Specter and his demoncRATS buddies would release judicial nominees?
Hence there's no point in considering his opinions.
Why is this news? Harry Reid opposing Bush. who'd a thunk?
I'm actually glad Reid et al. is going to oppose Roberts. He is almost certain to be confirmed anyway. And if the Democrats want to waste their SCOTUS opposition on Roberts rather than on O'Connor's replacement (who is surely to be more controversial, given the appointment will change the balance of the court), be my guest. They are perfectly free to oppose both nominees, but not without risking looking like the obstructionist fools that they are. They should have let Roberts through (since his appointment will not change the court makeup) and saved their whining and gnashing-of-teeth on the real controversy: the next nominee. Now they will only appear ridiculous.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.