Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Questions for Sen. Schumer(George Will hits another homer!)
WASHINGTONPOST.COM ^ | September 4, 2005 | George Will

Posted on 09/04/2005 6:58:12 AM PDT by kellynla

WASHINGTON -- New York Sen. Charles Schumer, a member of the Judiciary Committee and an author of the Democrats' catechism regarding constitutional reasoning, soon will be questioning John Roberts. Herewith some questions someone should ask Schumer:

Does Congress have the power to require Americans to floss after brushing their teeth? Or to regulate the amount of homework children do each night?

The federal government's powers supposedly are limited because they are enumerated. As James Madison said in Federalist 45, "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined." For seven decades, however, Congress has treated the Commerce Clause ("Congress shall have power . . . to regulate commerce . . . among the several states") as a license to do what it wants to do.

But in 1995, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 was unconstitutional because what the act criminalized -- possession of a firearm in or near a school -- was purely intrastate in nature and its effect, if any, on interstate commerce was negligible. The principal dissent, by Justice Stephen Breyer, argued that a gun might produce violence which would affect the economy by, among other things, injuring the learning environment, resulting in a less productive citizenry.

Do you, Sen. Schumer, support that reasoning? If so, does not Congress have the power to promote a healthy and productive citizenry by mandating flossing and regulating homework? Does it matter to you that the original intent of the Commerce Clause was to ensure the free movement of goods and services among the states? Do you think that Madison, the foremost Framer of the Constitution, misunderstood the Constitution?

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: 109th; charlesschumer; constitution; georgewill; robertshearings; schumer; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 09/04/2005 6:58:13 AM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Will's column last week on the judiciary was awful. He has completely recovered with this excellent piece.


2 posted on 09/04/2005 7:00:48 AM PDT by holdonnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holdonnow

well we all have a hangover once in a while...LOL


3 posted on 09/04/2005 7:04:40 AM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

You might as well ask those questions to a hog as ask them to Schumer.


4 posted on 09/04/2005 7:06:23 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Duplicate: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1476902/posts


5 posted on 09/04/2005 7:07:28 AM PDT by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66

well I checked and it didn't come up...


6 posted on 09/04/2005 7:11:06 AM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Not only mandatory flossing of teeth, liberals want the government to wipe every tear and most of the fannies.


7 posted on 09/04/2005 7:11:31 AM PDT by The Great RJ (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Detective Sergeant Schumer will now have TWICE as many questions, or the same ones asked of two different people.


8 posted on 09/04/2005 7:11:39 AM PDT by alloysteel ("Master of the painfully obvious.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
Will has always been a proponent of the 10th Amendment, I think it is, that limits the powers of the Federal Government to those defined in the Constitution literally. It's a dream, but it's a good one.
9 posted on 09/04/2005 7:15:00 AM PDT by Thebaddog (How's yer dogs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Another homer? Will has been in a deep slump for years. I stopped reading him.


10 posted on 09/04/2005 7:16:32 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
George assumes Schumer is an honest player..
The premise of the article is flawed.. as usual..
11 posted on 09/04/2005 7:18:32 AM PDT by hosepipe (This Propaganda has been edited to include not a small amount of Hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Then don't. LOL
geezzzzzzzzzz


12 posted on 09/04/2005 7:20:35 AM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
Will has always been a proponent of the 10th Amendment, I think it is, that limits the powers of the Federal Government to those defined in the Constitution literally. It's a dream, but it's a good one.

The function of government is to govern. "Them" will take whatever "us" are willing to relinquish.

13 posted on 09/04/2005 7:26:42 AM PDT by RobinOfKingston (Mein Koran-the Islamic manifesto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
"and its effect, if any, on interstate commerce was negligible"

To be fair, this should read, "and its effect, if any, on the interstate commerce that Congress was constitutionally regulating was negligible".

If some intrastate activity, commerce or not, does not have a substantial effect on the interstate commerce that Congress is already regulating, then that activity is off-limits to Congress.

The Supreme Court ruled correctly in the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 case.

14 posted on 09/04/2005 7:36:25 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
it's spelled SCHWULER!!!

15 posted on 09/04/2005 7:38:17 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Here's a question for Will: Do you think Schumer knows what a prime number is?


16 posted on 09/04/2005 7:46:45 AM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

Or a rock.


17 posted on 09/04/2005 7:56:53 AM PDT by Rennes Templar ("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Does it seem at all odd to you that the meaning of the Constitution, or at least of its emanating penumbras, would be different if the number of months in the gestation of a human infant were a prime number?

Will used the right word "human infant". I hate the word "fetus". The abortion crowd has deliberately pushed that word and conservatives should refuse to use it. It is an insidious form of propaganda.

18 posted on 09/04/2005 8:07:46 AM PDT by narby (Democrats are incompetent - just look at New Orleans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Will: The federal government's powers supposedly are limited because they are enumerated.

Schumer's office is preparing a reply stating that 'ennumerated' is a code word used only by Nazi sympathizers like George Will. And John Roberts.
19 posted on 09/04/2005 8:09:51 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narby

A fetus is an unborn infant by definition. A human infant is one who has been born. The term "fetus" was used before people realized that it was more than a mass of tissue.


20 posted on 09/04/2005 8:10:43 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Jeanine Pirro for Senate, Hillary Clinton for Weight Watchers Spokeswoman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson