To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
On the one hand, what a stupid thing for the state DMV to do. On the other hand, Federal intervention into state license plates seems pretty stupid, too.
Maybe the guy should just get a bumper sticker, and save the vanity-plate money.
2 posted on
09/02/2005 5:01:35 PM PDT by
Tax-chick
(How often lofty talk is used to deny others the same rights one claims for oneself. ~ Sowell)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
"The state contended and Byrne lawyers conceded two of his requests on his vanity plate application, "JOHN316" and "JN316" did not meet a provision for vanity plates in Vermont. The provision states that vanity license plates may not contain more than two numerals to avoid confusion with standard-issued license plates."
"However, the state also rejected Byrne's third vanity license plate choice, "JN36TN," arguing that it contains a religious viewpoint."
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
The state contended and Byrne lawyers conceded two of his requests on his vanity plate application, "JOHN316" and "JN316" did not meet a provision for vanity plates in Vermont. The provision states that vanity license plates may not contain more than two numerals to avoid confusion with standard-issued license plates. However, the state also rejected Byrne's third vanity license plate choice, "JN36TN," arguing that it contains a religious viewpoint.
What argument will they use next? Apparently they didn't think that JN316 was religious, or were afraid of using that argument unless completely necessary.
5 posted on
09/02/2005 5:04:43 PM PDT by
andyk
(Go Matt Kenseth!)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
The Rutland Herald is often referred to by locals as the "Baghdad Herald".
13 posted on
09/02/2005 5:13:41 PM PDT by
who knows what evil?
(New England...the Sodom and Gomorrah of the 21st Century, and they're proud of it!)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
U.S. District Court Judge J. Garvan MurthaThis is the same usurper that has reinstated the James Woodward fiasco here in Brattleboro.
What a complete dolt.
14 posted on
09/02/2005 5:17:03 PM PDT by
sirchtruth
(Words Mean Things...)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
"JN36TN."
For a while in Ohio that could have been an actual license plate number until they changed the numbering scheme again.
15 posted on
09/02/2005 5:17:04 PM PDT by
CzarNicky
(The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
16 posted on
09/02/2005 5:17:19 PM PDT by
Nateman
(More Vermont BullStuff)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
As an agnostic, I can say that I think this is extremely ridiculous. Yes, I realize that may be a surprise to some, but this is insane he should be able to put anything non-offensive he wants on his license plate.
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
I have absolutely no idea where the federal government gets off on determining that this is a legitimate religious message. First of all the Constitution doesn't give them the authority to do so. Secondly, the reference is no different than any other reference system, including ISBN, to identify a book or a body of information.
I am very offended that this officious judicial hack thinks it's alright to cram his personal religious beliefs down my throat.
25 posted on
09/02/2005 5:57:24 PM PDT by
muawiyah
(/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again?)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
Pretty soon it will be illegal for hispanics to name their sons 'Jesus'!
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
Were it not for the context of this article I'd never have figured out what this meant.
Thank goodness the DMV folks are sharp enough to prevent this from happening...... /sarc off
34 posted on
09/02/2005 7:52:18 PM PDT by
festus
(The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson