Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/24/2005 10:06:07 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: LibWhacker
So, VibramTM soles are from the Paleolithic?
2 posted on 08/24/2005 10:11:46 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

I'll buy that the idea of shoes may have spread in the mentioned 14,000 interval (40,000 - 26,000 BCE). But I can't buy the notion that the necessity to wear shoes due to evolutionary changes in human anatomy happened world wide in that period.


4 posted on 08/24/2005 10:44:06 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker; blam
Sturdy shoes first came into widespread use between 40,000 and 26,000 years ago,Humans' small toes became weaker during this time

By time of the emergence of modern humans (175,000 - 200,000 years ago), we had evolved the capability of running/jogging 35-50 miles per day on a near perpetual basis. An attribute Darwinism tells us wouldn't have occurred unless this ability was necessary to survive. IOW, those who couldn't keep up didn't live to mate. The one question I have about this running man theory of mine is the practical necessity of shoes or some type of foot protection to run that consistently. I seem to have found the answer in Steven Oppenhiemer's "The Real Eve" which postulates that modern humans were almost exclusively beach combers up until at least 60,000 years ago. It's a lot easier to run barefoot on soft sand than inland terrain.

He found Neanderthals and early moderns living in Middle Palaeolithic times (100,000 to 40,000 years ago) had thicker, and therefore stronger, lesser toes than those of Upper Palaeolithic people living 26,000 years ago.

Since again, Darwinism implies that physical evolution wouldn't occur unless it was necessary to survive over an extended period, the stretched dates seem logical for the inland move away from the beach for modern humans, the cold weather suggestion seems more appropriate for the neatherdhals?

6 posted on 08/24/2005 11:13:59 PM PDT by shuckmaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
Sturdy shoes first came into widespread use between 40,000 and 26,000 years ago, according to a US scientist.Humans' small toes became weaker during this time, says physical anthropologist Erik Trinkaus, who has studied scores of early human foot bones. He attributes this anatomical change to the invention of rugged shoes, that reduced our need for strong, flexible toes to grip and balance.

This is absurd. People stopped growing strong toes because shoes came along? No one could make that argument with a straight face. They would need to argue that strong toed people were not sexually desirable so didn't pass along their strong toes...that would at least make evolutionary sense.

7 posted on 08/24/2005 11:18:58 PM PDT by Jim_Curtis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

How can they tell how strong a toe was without having muscle tissue to examine? Bone size seems irrelevant. Europeans typically have larger bones in their feet than Asians do. So what?


8 posted on 08/24/2005 11:32:29 PM PDT by Jaysun (Democrats: We must become more effective at fooling people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker


I might sound vain but I could care less about this as long as I keep getting my Manolo Blahniks. Ladies, you KNOW exactly what I am saying :)



13 posted on 08/25/2005 12:19:04 AM PDT by Quinotto (On matters of style swim with the current,on matters of principle stand like a rock-Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
""The oldest shoes in the world are about 9,000 years old, and they're from California," said Professor Trinkaus, of Washington University in St Louis, US."

Spirit Cave Man had shoes and he is 9,400 years old and is from Nevada.

24 posted on 08/25/2005 6:12:01 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

They might also check my theory that shorter toes are the result of people with long toes dying off the evolutionary ladder when their long toes overhung paleolithic footwear and stubbed their toes with killing effect.


31 posted on 08/25/2005 12:05:21 PM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Birgenstocks?


35 posted on 08/25/2005 5:48:22 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (Be a Good Mullah Now ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shuckmaster; blam; FairOpinion; Ernest_at_the_Beach; StayAt HomeMother; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; asp1; ...
Thanks shuckmaster for the FReemail.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

38 posted on 08/25/2005 9:51:01 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Sunday, August 14, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Ancient shoes....hmmmmmm.......

Those wouldn't be Red Ball Jets, would they?


39 posted on 08/25/2005 9:53:05 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


The Neandertals The Neandertal Enigma
The Neandertals
by Erik Trinkaus
and Pat Shipman
The Neandertal Enigma
by James Shreeve


42 posted on 08/25/2005 10:03:32 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Sunday, August 14, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
Bones reveal first shoe-wearers

I'd bet money it was a woman...

45 posted on 08/25/2005 10:10:29 PM PDT by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Hwæt! Lãr biþ mæst hord, soþlïce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

I read an article years ago that claimed ancient Romans had exceedingly long toes. I guess this guy didn't read the article or check out any Roman statues.


48 posted on 08/25/2005 10:19:45 PM PDT by lizma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Shoes for industry..


57 posted on 08/26/2005 6:32:01 AM PDT by wildehunt (i told them they'd need horses...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Bones? He's dead, Jim.


59 posted on 08/26/2005 6:55:29 AM PDT by RichInOC (...somebody was going to post it...why not me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

The shoes to have, when I was a child, were made by a Mr. Tenny.

Of modest cost, they would enable a young lad to climb mountains, cross deserts, peddle bikes, fish in safety, find mystery, adventure and fun, while allowing a speedy retreat.

Mothers and Teachers called a new pair Jim Shoes, and we kids, not allowed to call adults by their first name, naturally assumed Mr. Tenny's first name was Jim.

I would love to find a new pair of the finest adventure footwear ever made, a pair of Mr.Tenny's Shoes.


60 posted on 08/26/2005 7:35:55 AM PDT by FreedomFarmer (Socialism is not an ideology, it is a disease. Eliminate the vectors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Sounds like junk science to me.


101 posted on 08/29/2005 3:18:38 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (Conservatives are from Earth. Liberals are from Uranus.(c))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson