Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

One is toasty warm, thanks
The Australian ^ | 23 August 2005

Posted on 08/22/2005 11:23:10 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher

QUEEN Elizabeth II is planning to create an underground network to extract heat from the earth's natural warmth and cut energy bills at Buckingham Palace for centuries to come.

She has inspired a fashion among the super-rich for drilling boreholes at their properties as the latest "green" status symbol. Advocates include pop star Elton John, tycoon Richard Branson and billionaire Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen.

The Buckingham Palace system will provide a secure, free and inexhaustible energy supply from beneath the surface of the 1.6ha lake at the heart of the walled gardens. It will pump heating to the state rooms, the formal area of the palace.

Water containing a refrigerant chemical is circulated through a loop of pipework running through the lake bed and into the groundwater feeding it. The slow journey through the coils allows the liquid to absorb the surrounding heat at a constant 12C.

The Queen ordered a small trial in 2002 that drilled 122m into the chalk aquifer beneath the palace grounds to run an eco-friendly airconditioning system for a new art gallery, built at Buckingham Palace to mark her golden jubilee. The results were apparently so impressive that she is ready to take the bold step of using a new underground heating system to replace conventional sources for part of the palace.

The water-refrigerant combination that has absorbed the heat from the ground passes back up the pipe and into the palace where it goes through a compressor that "concentrates" the latent energy, raising the temperature of the liquid to 55C-60C. It then passes through metal plates in contact with water that is used for the taps, radiators and underfloor heating.

The liquid can also be decompressed so that instead of generating heat, it can provide cool air for airconditioning. The venture is the most radical among a wide range of environmentally conscious schemes adopted by the royal household in recent years.

The Queen's state cars have been switched to liquid petroleum gas, as has the taxi used by Prince Philip to drive anonymously around London.

The Buckingham Palace scheme will cost up to pound stg. 50,000 ($120,000), but is expected to pay for itself in three to seven years. It could then provide free heat energy for a century with almost no maintenance.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: hermajesty; poms; queen; queenelizabethii; royals
Now the bloody Queen's gone green!!!!

What's to become of us...?

1 posted on 08/22/2005 11:23:11 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
The Queen is probably doing it for cost efficiency, but the reporter has his own agenda.

I wonder how many years it will be until they tell us how this is damaging the ecosystem.

2 posted on 08/22/2005 11:28:29 PM PDT by Ruth A.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
"Now the bloody Queen's gone green!!!! What's to become of us...?"
You can do her one better and start photosynthesis. Then you'd turn green both figuratively AND literally. Why, you might even get knighted for your trouble.
3 posted on 08/22/2005 11:30:52 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
The Buckingham Palace scheme will cost up to pound stg. 50,000 ($120,000), but is expected to pay for itself in three to seven years. It could then provide free heat energy for a century with almost no maintenance.

WOW! The per year savings will be between $17,000 and $40,000 which means the total bill right now must be enormous.

4 posted on 08/22/2005 11:31:49 PM PDT by mc6809e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

So, it is an underground heat pump system. The weakest link is the compressor. We had to replace our heat pump/compressor every 5-10 years making it a very expensive heating system.


5 posted on 08/22/2005 11:36:14 PM PDT by WHATNEXT? (That's PRESIDENT BUSH (not Mr.)!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WHATNEXT?
So, it is an underground heat pump system. The weakest link is the compressor. We had to replace our heat pump/compressor every 5-10 years making it a very expensive heating system.

My heat pump has lasted at least 15 years.

Overall, heat pumps save money for most people, providing about 3.3 times as much heat as you'd get from direct heating by electricity. Typical open-loop systems like the one described in the article will give you back 4 to 5 times the heat.

Maybe you just had some bad luck.

6 posted on 08/22/2005 11:46:26 PM PDT by mc6809e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mc6809e

Just dig a deeper hole so you get geothermal heat. Then you don't need a heat pump. Just a pump. It probably takes a really deep hole... ;-) Bad luck if you hit some nasty gas... You might hit oil first though...


7 posted on 08/23/2005 12:45:20 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
We have been using heat pumps in Texas for a long time. Of course, since the temperature of the ground is more stable than air, a gournd based system is going to be more efficient, albeit more expensive to install.
8 posted on 08/23/2005 12:55:02 AM PDT by Shawndell Green (Mecca delenda est!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Wow, the bloody British have invented a new system that has only been in use in American homes for 20 years. At this rate the EU will catch up with America in about 300 or so decades... Using well pump heat sinks is very old technology. A more advanced version pumps water from one well, uses it in a heat exchanger in the cooling system and pours the used water back down another well. Rather than risking contamination of the water table, or saturation of the well with heat or cooling buildup limiting your savings, you return the unwanted thermal load to another well and as the water flows between the two wells it transfers the heat to a much larger area. And as a bonus, you do not need expensive special refrigerant piping and special systems.

But give um another 20 years and they will figure that out too. Bloody brilliant they may be, but sometimes it helps to read a trade mag or two from America.
9 posted on 08/23/2005 4:44:08 AM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel

State Certified Mechanical Contractor/Engineer Bump!


10 posted on 08/23/2005 5:14:49 AM PDT by poobear (Imagine a world of liberal silence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WHATNEXT?
"The weakest link is the compressor."

To the compressor:

You are The Weakest Link! Good-bye.

11 posted on 08/23/2005 5:17:26 AM PDT by Michael Bluth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mc6809e
My heat pump has lasted at least 15 years.

My wife called our (former) heat pump the "cold pump." Maybe it's efficient but it did not heat very well - not well enough to overcome even our mild Tennessee winters. We now use natural gas. It may be expensive, but it works.

12 posted on 08/23/2005 5:21:00 AM PDT by Martin Tell (Red States [should act like they] Rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mc6809e

I have a heat pump here in the desert where it doesn't get too cold...my problem with it is that if the outdoor temp drops below 40 or so (certainly not cold!) the damn compressor hisses and shuts off, leaving only the fan running. Such as that is, there's no way I'd want to leave the thermostat set to "heat" overnight.


13 posted on 08/23/2005 5:27:29 AM PDT by ErnBatavia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Just throw the queen and elton down a 3,000 ft mineshaft. The temperature should be a toasty 80 degrees.


14 posted on 08/23/2005 5:54:59 AM PDT by sergeantdave (Member of Arbor Day Foundation, travelling the country and destroying open space)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson