To: WJHII
You may be asking yourself: Doesnt the American Liberal protest every war? The answer is no. Need one be reminded of President Clintons personal war against the nation of Yugoslavia (Serbia)? At a time when Saddam Hussein was killing Kurds, North Korea was developing nuclear weapons, a massive undisputed genocide was taking place in Africa and Al-Qaeda was planning its attack on the World Trade Center, President Clinton decided to fight a war he knew he could win.
On a few website bulletin boards, I have used the term PEACE NAZI to describe the peace movement in general, and one person asked me for an explanation as to what the term means and why I say it. Here is my answer:
It is intentionally derogatory, and I use it because I believe it has to be said.
It has to do with the foundation of the PEACE movement in the US and abroad and their Communist foundation, and how the majority of the signs held and slogans chanted are not about peace or genuine concern for the people of two warring countries, it is about the anti-American attitudes and the violence-inducing signs and slogans calling for violence against American Troops and President Bush.
Carrying signs calling on troops to kill their officers, to bomb Texas, for Bush to choke on a pretzel and die, for troops to shoot their officers, signs that call for communist revolution, starting fights with people who disagree with you while carrying a peace sign, trying to steal my money in Boston while carrying a peace sign and then telling me because you were shamed into giving back the money that means you are ok after all...
Things like that.
I will NOT stop using it. It is intended to make the peace protester think.
After all the horrors we found in Iraq, you should all be thankful we went in and invaded to remove that madman. Yet, the mantra has changed, it is now against occupation! Still, not one PEACE NAZI has apologized and admitted we were right. All they do is complain that a people that were under slavery for 30 years have gone looting, and who do they blame? Why the US!! We did nothing to stop it! Maybe because we stayed out of the crowd because the PEACE NAZIS would have complained we didnt let them vent their anger??
(As a side note, people who are now called PEACE NAZIS didnt call on the LAPD or Federal Troops to stop the LA riots after the Rodney King riots, did they? They told us all to step back and let them vent their anger, yet all of a sudden, we are supposed to go in and use force to stop rioters in Iraq?)
And to top it off, we are flushing out the terrorists in places like Fallujah, the places where the Murderous Mullahs all take refuge, and the PEACE NAZIS have not ONCE held a rally to decry the beheadings of Americans or Iraqi CARE workers! Not one PEACE NAZI rally held to call for justice for the Killers of Daniel Pearl or any foreigner killed in Iraq!
We never intended to occupy a country like SYRIA has the last 20 years, and where are the PEACE NAZIS and their signs calling on SYRIA to leave Lebanon? They are non existent. The Syrians killed tens of thousands, chasing little children into bedrooms and shooting them point blank.
Did you know there was a Christian Community in Beirut before 1985? Now, they are almost either all killed or fled from the Syrian backed Junta, and not a peep from the PEACE NAZIS, only against American forces sent to Beirut to keep peace. Why arent the PEACE NAZIS arguing for the return of the Christian Community back to Beirut where they lived for 2 Millennium?
Where were the PEACE NAZIS when Israel was blockaded in 1967? Where were the PEACE NAZIS when Israel was attacked on her Holy Day of Yom Kippur in 1973? Where were the PEACE NAZIS when the PLO was shelling Katyusha rockets into Israel in 1982? Oh, Yeah, I remember, they were telling Israel to stop defending themselves!
In fact, there is not a single country that we ever went to war with that we stayed as the government power for more than 10 years! We always returned it to the people.
And that brings up another point: PEACE NAZIS are NOT against war, they are against wars that the US is engaged in to overthrow pro-Communist or PRO-radical Islamic regimes or PRO-Maoist/PRO-Stalinist regimes.
My point here, is simple: These COMMIES are not for peace. If they were, they would have been screaming about Clinton killing innocents to keep his sexual scandals off the tv;
they would have been screaming for the Palestinian Liberation Organization to stop killing Jews;
they would have been screaming for Hamas and Islamic Jihad to stop killing Jews;
they would have been screaming for the Hutus and Tutsis to make peace;
they would have been screaming for that madman Saddam to stop killing Kurds or Iranians;
they would have been screaming for the Turks to stop killing Kurds or Greeks;
they would have been screaming for the Chinese to stop killing Vietnamese in 1982;
they would have been screaming for the Angolan Army to stop killing with the help of the Cuban Army in the 1980's;
they would have been screaming for the Muslims to stop killing Christians in Indonesia, Malaysia, and China and North Korea;
They would have been screaming for the Sudanese to stop the torture and slave trade which continues today in Darfur;
They would have been screaming when the Syrians invaded Lebanon in 1985 and have continued an occupation of Lebanon since the 1980's;
They would have been screaming when Pol Pot started a genocide in 1975;
They would be screaming now about Mugabe killing all the white farmers in Africa in Zimbabwe;
They would have been screaming at the murders caused by the African National Congress and their necklacing of prisoners and at Winnie Mandela who was convicted of murder, yet the communists are silent;
They would have been screaming about Tiananmen Square, but they are silent;
They would have been screaming about the repression in Cuba and why so many people have chosen to flee in rickety little boats, but instead they lionize that dictator, Castro;
They would have been screaming about the invasion of South Vietnam in 1975 where the north started a genocide campaign in direct violation of the Paris Peace Accords of 1973 and caused over 2 million Vietnamese to flee in little boats that got picked up by ships like the one I was on in 1981;
They would be screaming at the Palestinians for their suicide bombings that intentionally target innocent school age children;
They would be screaming at the Palestinians for their suicide bombings that intentionally target innocent people on buses, or pizza parlors, or weddings, or wheel-chair bound invalids on cruise ships, or Olympic hotels;
Except, the only time they scream is when the US is at war against a tyrant who is support by Russia or France.
In much of the world, the antics and policies of these PEACE NAZIS would result in jail or worse. Cuba, China and many socialist countries routinely eliminate protests and protesters against the government and its leaders. It seems ironic that the ultimate goal of these protesters is to transform America into the kind of government that tolerates no dissent.
And since NAZI is one of the most vile insults you can give someone in our last two generations, I call them PEACE NAZIS, for they are not for peace, they are for war, they are for the overthrow of my country and into communism and anarchy, and they are a violent bunch who base their foundation on lies and the telling of lies and the repeating of lies.
6 posted on
08/20/2005 4:33:56 PM PDT by
RaceBannon
((Prov 28:1 KJV) The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the righteous are bold as a lion.)
To: RaceBannon
7 posted on
08/20/2005 4:46:47 PM PDT by
Sal
(Against all rationality and practical example, Marxians practice their religion--Marxianity.)
To: RaceBannon
Nice rant Race.
However
"the antics and policies of these PEACE NAZIS would result in jail or worse. Cuba, China and many socialist countries routinely eliminate protests and protesters against the government and its leaders."
In those countries the Peacenazis would have been bussed in
by the government!
9 posted on
08/20/2005 4:58:56 PM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: RaceBannon
14 posted on
08/20/2005 5:36:23 PM PDT by
GloriaJane
(http://music.download.com/gloriajane "Baseball Apple Pie And Mom")
To: RaceBannon
Right ON!!!
That's a keeper. I haven't heard it said any better...ever.
17 posted on
08/20/2005 6:26:21 PM PDT by
gooleyman
( What about the baby's "RIGHT TO CHOOSE"?????? I bet the baby would chose LIFE.)
To: RaceBannon
you have to ask why the libs are always talking about "peace"....peace this peace that.
karl marx stated that the presence of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism.
20 posted on
08/20/2005 6:43:52 PM PDT by
Stellar Dendrite
( Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy. -Churchill)
To: RaceBannon
22 posted on
08/20/2005 7:41:53 PM PDT by
Exit148
(Founder of the Loose Change Club. Every nickle and dime counts!!)
To: RaceBannon
Excellent op-ed piece Race. Why don't you send that to the Hartford Courant? Do you really think that they would print it? Of course not. You are not an elitist college professor and it's anti-lib. They print liberal/conservative letters at a 75/25 ratio. Ah, the beauty of living in a blue state!
26 posted on
08/20/2005 9:10:13 PM PDT by
dancusa
(Appeasement, high taxes and regulation collects in the diapers of bed wetting liberals.)
To: RaceBannon
To: RaceBannon
........And may I add Michele Jacklin is'nt fond of you.
29 posted on
08/20/2005 9:17:49 PM PDT by
dancusa
(Appeasement, high taxes and regulation collects in the diapers of bed wetting liberals.)
To: RaceBannon
Excellent essay. The 'Peace-Nazi' moniker is apropos and deliciously non-PC. Your arguments are well-formed and heavily buttressed by indefatigable facts. Start your own blog, Dude. Ya gots skilz!!!
peace. . . Deets
31 posted on
08/20/2005 11:42:30 PM PDT by
ebiskit
(South Park Republican)
To: RaceBannon
What you said. Liberals and lefists have proven themselves to be the biggest stinking hypocrites in the world. I have one friend who despises Bush. He said to me that (1) "the Iraq war has killed hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis" and (2) "who cares about Iraq, they've been killing each other for centuries." He uttered these words just minutes apart from each statement. And he was entirely unable to see the inconsistency in his conflicting statements. I pointed them out to him, but then he didn't want to talk about it anymore.
But I've heard or read similar statements by anti-war types. They'll claim that who cares how many Iraqis die, it's their business and then go on to claim that we're criminals for killing civilians. Logic is not liberals strongest point.
32 posted on
08/21/2005 12:16:29 AM PDT by
driftless
( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson