Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peter Jennings' Unfortunate Legacy
FPM ^ | 11 AUGUST 2005 | Debbie Schlussel

Posted on 08/11/2005 1:48:54 AM PDT by rdb3

Peter Jennings' Unfortunate Legacy
By Debbie Schlussel
FrontPageMagazine.com | August 11, 2005

Preview Image

It's sad when anyone dies of cancer, but we cant' let the human side of the Peter Jennings story obscure his real "achievements."

While the rest of the world is blindly singing Jennings' praises, here's a reality check: Peter Jennings did more for the cause of Islamic terrorism than any media figure today. And that's nothing to celebrate, honor, or even memorialize.

It is no coincidence that al-Jazeera's chief Washington correspondent praised ABC -- and Jennings, in particular -- for their "objectivity." Before there was al-Jazeera, there was Peter Jennings.

From the beginning of Jennings' career until his death, his biased coverage went beyond the pale, bending over backward in "understanding" the terrorists who hate us -- from seeing "their side" when he covered the seige and then murder of innocent Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics to honoring an al-Qaeda operative with a prized "commentator" spot during Jennings coverage of the 9/11 attacks.

Throughout Jennings' coverage of the attacks, he frequently featured a man named Tariq Hamdi (whose commentary urged understanding for the radical Muslim world), identifying Hamdi only as "journalist" on the chyron.

But, in fact, Jennings' friend Hamdi was no journalist at all. As I've written, Hamdi was an accused Bin Laden associate and employed by Sami al-Arian, the head of Palestinian Islamic Jihad in the United States.

According to prosecutors and documents in the 1998 trial of the Osama bin Laden bombings of U.S. embassies in Africa (the 7th anniversary of which was yesterday), Hamdi provided Bin Laden a satellite battery instrumental in those bombings. He's also an unindicted co-conspirator with Islamic Jihad financial head Sami al-Arian, who employed him at his Islamic "charity" fronts at the University of South Florida. Hamdi was also an employee of a Saudi-funded charity raided by Customs agents for allegedly laundering billions to al-Qaeda through the Isle of Man.

Jennings mentioned absolutely nothing about Hamdi's disturbing activities, but did note that Hamdi was his friend and repeatedly featured Hamdi in post-9/11 ABC News broadcasts. This is the type of "journalist" and "commentator" Jennings frequently employed in his so-called newscast of which he was an all-controlling editor.

Now the Washington Post repeats what I've said about Hamdi, but adds more. Days ago, Hamdi was indicted for immigration and mortgage-loan fraud. While failing to mention Jennings, the Post also adds, "ABC did not respond to a request for more information about its relationship with Hamdi." The recently unsealed indictment also mentions that Hamdi was the U.S. representative for the Committee for the Defense of Legitimate Rights in Saudi Arabia, "a London-based organization that has embraced many of bin Laden's views," according to the Post.

That's a "journalist" in what was "The World According to Peter Jennings."

(Hamdi has now fled the U.S. Don't count on him coming back to face justice. Question for ICE press flack, Dean Boyd: Why was Tariq Hamdi allowed to leave the U.S.?)

I always say, pillow talk is the most effective form of political speech. And it apparently had its effect on Jennings early on. When developing and heading up ABC's Beirut headquarters, Jennings "dated" Palestinian Hanan Ashrawi. And it colored his insidious, anti-American, anti-Israel coverage ever since.

Then there were the sneers, the sneers of a Canadian high school drop-out for anything conservative, anything mainstream, anything pro-Western, pro-America, pro-Israel, etc. Jennings' sneers and snide comments were always evident for those who did not meet his very left-of-center point of view. A great example was his sneering during the 2000 vote recount, and after, when Bush was declared President. Another was his sneering just after the 9/11 attacks when Bush delivered his speech to a joint session of Congress. Then there was his sneering reaction and say-it-ain't-so comments when conservative revolutionaries led Republicans to capture the House of Representatives in 1994. And who can forget Jennings' sneering ABC News Special in which he decried America's bombing of Heroshima and Nagasaki, which saved American lives.

Jennings' elitist sneers will NOT be missed.

During ABC's Gulf War coverage, when ABC military expert Tony Cordesman attributed much of the success of our military forces to Israeli improvements to our weapons systems and as command and control advised by the Israelis, Jennings became enraged and argued with him.

While Jenning's death is a human tragedy, it is sad that his despicable brand of advocacy journalism -- parading as "news" -- wasn't laid to rest along with him.

Unfortunately, that will not happen. His version has spawned a thousand clones. Sadly, the female, more personable, non-toupeed version of Jennings -- Elizabeth Vargas -- is set to step into Jennings' shoes. She got off to a great Jennings-esque start in her first hosting duties at ABC's "20/20," last fall. She delivered a very sympathetic profile and interview of Hamas operative and fundraiser Cat Stevens. Expect more of this to come.

It's sad when anyone dies of cancer. I won't dance on Jennings' grave, even though he managed to justify the early graves of young, innocent athletes slaughtered at the Munich Olympics -- the way he blasphemed their murders with his shallow, understand-the-Islamic-terrorists coverage. Unlike the murdered Munich athletes he dishonored, Jennings died in peace and without pain. He got to say good-bye to his loved ones. They did not.

I will remember Peter Jennings for the less than honorable person he was -- not the emperor with no clothing that is now being memorialized.

Jennings used to end his newscasts with, "And that's a look at our world." No, it wasn't a look at our world, at all. It was Peter Jennings' slanted world, and every day he acted as if he was doing us a favor giving us his warped look at it.

Jennings' legacy is helping advance the cause of Islamic terrorists on broadcast television, parading it as news. He wrote his own epitaph with it. Unfortunately, it came with a lot more tombstones and epitaphs than just Jennings' -- and most of those buried beneath are a whole lot more innocent.

They are the victims of Islamic terrorism -- the brand Peter Jennings helped build into a network news product. That cancer, unfortunately, is still here. And it has metasticized.

(Read more on the REAL Peter Jennings.)



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abcnews; enemywithin; jennings; municholympics; peter; peterjennings
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-103 next last

1 posted on 08/11/2005 1:48:55 AM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3

bttt


2 posted on 08/11/2005 1:50:50 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

Tisk tisk. This babe isn't afraid to tell it like it is. I personally prefer to refrain from speaking ill of the dead, at least until they're underground.


3 posted on 08/11/2005 1:55:53 AM PDT by Jaysun (Democrats: We must become more effective at fooling people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Chevy Sales
hell he would stink it up underground too
he was a godless anti American and worse
he chose to be all that

True. I just think it's distasteful and disrespectful to come out with both guns blazing before he's even in the box, that's all. It's really a matter of personal preference I guess.
5 posted on 08/11/2005 2:03:57 AM PDT by Jaysun (Democrats: We must become more effective at fooling people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

He doesn't have the USA to kick around anymore, for damn sure.


6 posted on 08/11/2005 2:08:20 AM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun

I tend to agree.


7 posted on 08/11/2005 2:09:20 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

Sadly, the female... non-toupeed version of Jennings...

This is Schlussel's problem--she can't ever seem to make a point w/o resorting to irrelevant gutter-sniping. She has all the nuance of a James Carville and worse timing. Diminishes her voice & makes her less effective, IMO.

8 posted on 08/11/2005 2:18:06 AM PDT by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

I hated him and felt relief when he died. Just telling the truth. Now if about 500 others of his ilk would just follow his and Robin Cook's example, we just might win the WOT and set America back on course.


9 posted on 08/11/2005 2:21:14 AM PDT by wildcatf4f3 (whats wrong with a draft?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
Tisk tisk. This babe isn't afraid to tell it like it is. I personally prefer to refrain from speaking ill of the dead, at least until they're underground.

I'm kinda with you on that one. Write it if you must, but wait until after the funeral to publish it. Just kind of basic human decency.

10 posted on 08/11/2005 2:24:44 AM PDT by brewcrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: rdb3

She didn't wait for the body to go cold before she wrote her screed. Cold, cold, woman. And David Horowitz, who I'm glad is on our side, made a mistake publishing this so quickly.


12 posted on 08/11/2005 2:25:40 AM PDT by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chevy Sales
fair and understood...in Tx we say...."one man's opinion is another man's wife"

I'm from Texas. We also used to say that opinions are like assholes, everybody's got one and everybody thinks everyone else's stinks.
13 posted on 08/11/2005 2:27:18 AM PDT by Jaysun (Democrats: We must become more effective at fooling people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: rdb3
I will remember Peter Jennings for the less than honorable person he was -- not the emperor with no clothing that is now being memorialized.

Great post. Still, I'll wait another week before I "honor" Peter Jennings, myself...

16 posted on 08/11/2005 2:30:14 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chevy Sales
which was always a way to end debate..sp opinions are assholes ? So our founding fathers were assholes ? God and Christ certainly had opinions, were they ?

It's just a cliche.
17 posted on 08/11/2005 2:33:03 AM PDT by Jaysun (Democrats: We must become more effective at fooling people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: Chevy Sales
words have meaning........el Rushbo ( a million times)

I know, I was simply sharing lingo with you. No big deal.
19 posted on 08/11/2005 2:37:16 AM PDT by Jaysun (Democrats: We must become more effective at fooling people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator

Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: rdb3

What's with all this reverential tiptoeing around after the death of a known terrorist sympathizer and America-hater? I say good riddance.

More information here:
http://www.discoverthenetwork.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1733


24 posted on 08/11/2005 2:56:54 AM PDT by omniscient
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: Jaysun

Well, we are at war so some would disagree, esp.(you'd think), Cindy Sheehan!.


26 posted on 08/11/2005 3:03:25 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

"Let Us Roll"


27 posted on 08/11/2005 3:05:22 AM PDT by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: Jaysun

But also remember that assholes provide a very essential function = minimize the number of people with brown eyes!


29 posted on 08/11/2005 3:15:10 AM PDT by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator

To: Jaysun
"I personally prefer to refrain from speaking ill of the dead, at least until they're underground."

Why wait? She nailed her description of Jennings. :)

31 posted on 08/11/2005 3:48:25 AM PDT by libs_kma (USA: The land of the Free....Because of the Brave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
It's sad when anyone dies of cancer.

Nonsense. It all depends on the person.

I used to have a redneck, son-of-a-bitch brother-in-law who would go to the local bowling alley and raise hell on a regular basis, picking fights which he would invariably lose. One of my wife's co-workers used to moonlight at the same bowling alley, and knew my brother-in-law quite well. One day my brother-in-law was bowling on the third lane, and had just rolled a nasty split. Just as he was going for his second ball, he turned a wonderful shade of blue, collapsed, and died right then and there. Later, my wife's friend told her, "I'm really sorry; I know he was your sister's husband, but I've never been so glad to see anyone die." Those were not his sentiments alone, I can assure you.

32 posted on 08/11/2005 4:03:33 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

I am trying to read this article, but something keeps distracting me.

33 posted on 08/11/2005 4:04:55 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

ping


34 posted on 08/11/2005 4:08:05 AM PDT by jjw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elli1

The bit about the toupe was "under the belt", but I won't pretend he was good just because he's dead.


35 posted on 08/11/2005 4:43:06 AM PDT by libertylover (Liberal: A blatant liar who likes to spend other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Chevy
I found "Baghdad Bob" to be more credible than Jennings.,p> "Baghdad Bob" provided comic relief in the same manner that Rev. Al does. They are the enemy that we can laugh at.
36 posted on 08/11/2005 4:54:30 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

Thanks for the dose of reality.

bump


37 posted on 08/11/2005 4:56:17 AM PDT by HighWheeler (RATS hero is an impeached, dis-barred, lying, perjuring, cheating, lazy, cowardly sexual predator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun

"I personally prefer to refrain from speaking ill of the dead, at least until they're underground."


Then you must have missed out on all the celebration when Uday and Qusay died.


38 posted on 08/11/2005 4:59:59 AM PDT by HighWheeler (RATS hero is an impeached, dis-barred, lying, perjuring, cheating, lazy, cowardly sexual predator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

And no one brings up the fact that he lived for a time with that Hanna woman who is now a muckety-muck in the Palistian government. No, Jennings was never unbiased when it came to his support of the Palistians.


39 posted on 08/11/2005 5:03:34 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HighWheeler
Then you must have missed out on all the celebration when Uday and Qusay died.

You must of missed the tiny print: Certain restrictions and conditions apply, void where prohibited.
40 posted on 08/11/2005 5:03:50 AM PDT by Jaysun (Democrats: We must become more effective at fooling people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: elli1

So it would be a good guess that you don't appreciate Ann Coulter.


41 posted on 08/11/2005 5:08:22 AM PDT by Pharmboy (There is no positive correlation between the ability to write, act, sing or dance and being right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

Needed to be said. Dead-on.


42 posted on 08/11/2005 5:08:42 AM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

Peter Jennings was way too friendly towards Islam. He went native when he was a foreign correspondent in the Middle East. Another brain captured by it's romanticization of Arab culture. Happens to the English all the time.


43 posted on 08/11/2005 5:12:50 AM PDT by dennisw ( G_d - ---> Against Amelek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brewcrew
"Just kind of basic human decency."

I agree with you fundamentally, but I figured out before I was out of elementary school that reporters/journalists on the whole are one of the world's lowest life forms, almost completely void of human decency. It's just that every now and then, the message that's tastelessly delivered over a warm carcass is so pointedly accurate that it cannot help but evoke hearty assent.

44 posted on 08/11/2005 5:15:36 AM PDT by sweetliberty (Never argue with a fool. People might not know the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Chevy Sales; Jaysun
opinions are assholes ? So our founding fathers were assholes ? God and Christ certainly had opinions, were they ?

Good grief. No doubt satan and George III had less than glowing opinions of God, Christ, and our founding fathers. And besides Jaysun didn't say everyone in the world is an asshole. He said "opinions are like assholes, everybody's got one and everybody thinks everyone else's stinks". It's a figure of speech. And if you need to ask- it can be said with great certainty that the founding fathers and our Lord and Savior all had one. As for God, well, we all find out in the end (pun intended). Lighten up.

45 posted on 08/11/2005 5:22:15 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: brewcrew

Crapola, jennings was an anti American socilaist.
I don't give a damn if he moved to the U.S. it was for purely financial dealings.
He died of his own doings, he smoked and a lot.
I usually was inscensed when I ever had the misfortune to tune in to his "news program", that was usually little more then propaganda for the islamists or any other group fighting the U.S.
Watch any interview of a liberal like the murderer Kennedy and watch his demeanor then watch his scowl when forced to interview any conservative.
He died. I feel bed for those he left behind and their grief but the put him of some pedestal and say great things about him is just lunacy.


46 posted on 08/11/2005 5:56:44 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
The MSM is exemplified by people like Jennings. The glorification and lionization of Jennings epitomizes the MSM's overblown image of itself. The reporters are bigger than the stories they cover. Jennings received over $8 a year to report his biased screed.

I was in Iran in 1978 when Jimmy Carter and his huge entourage of 900 reporters visited Tehran on New Year's eve. Barbara Walters was on the trip. She was accorded rock star status including being one of a few reporters to be invited to the Shah's relatively intimate dinner honoring Carter. She was invited because she was a celebrity, not a reporter.

The idea that a "news reader" like Jennings could leave any real legacy is nonsense. Like the rest of the news media, he was a legend in his own mind.

47 posted on 08/11/2005 6:10:51 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Just the fact that his friend was Alan Alda was enough to know he was a commie lib~rat scuzzball.


48 posted on 08/11/2005 6:11:07 AM PDT by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

I remember Peter Jennings slandering President Reagan (I don't recall the particulars, but I do remember it was an inference that Reagan was a"racist") while the video feed showed Reagan's casket being carried either in or out of the church.

Peter Jennings is known for his class, although he had none.


49 posted on 08/11/2005 6:17:27 AM PDT by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun; brewcrew; BCrago66
Jaysun: I personally prefer to refrain from speaking ill of the dead, at least until they're underground.

What's the difference exactly? You need to wait until Pol Pot and his cronies are buried before you denounce them? If Sean Penn died, you couldn't remind people that he was a Saddam apologist? If Belafonte died, you couldn't say how much he loved the murderous Castro? If Jane Fonda died, you couldn't remind people of her aid to North Vietnam?

This notion of not speaking ill of the dead is wrong-headed. What about all the dead victims of these murderous regimes and terrorist groups? To keep silent about Jennings and his ilk certainly disrespects the victims of these mass murderers. You need to speak out and present the truth before they canonize him as some saint of journalism. Undoubtedly, that is their intent.

Jaysun: I just think it's distasteful and disrespectful to come out with both guns blazing before he's even in the box...

You presume he has any right to be respected. That is, in fact, the entire point of the article. You seem to know the truth here. You just shy away from the consequences. Jennings hated and tried to harm this country as a foreign journalist. But because he was popular, personable and a daily part of the lives of millions of (idiot) viewers, somehow he gets immunity. This is like arguing that we can't criticize Stalin on the same grounds.

brewcrew: Write it if you must, but wait until after the funeral to publish it. Just kind of basic human decency.

Tell me, did Jennings wait to defend the Pali terrorists who killed the Israeli athletes in Munich? Did he wait for their funerals? No, he did his best to shield these terrorists. It was, in fact, because of Jennings and other journalists in the West who carried water for them which encouraged terrorists to escalate their attacks on the West. Jennings' old girlfriend, Ashrawi, was a key player in the rise of terrorism in Israel under the original Intefada. It's a simple fact. Why is it so bad to simply tell the truth about it?

BCrago66: She didn't wait for the body to go cold before she wrote her screed. Cold, cold, woman. And David Horowitz, who I'm glad is on our side, made a mistake publishing this so quickly.

Personally, I admire them both. The truth needs to come out so these journalists understand we'll never back down when they sympathize and provide priceless aid to totalitarian dictators (Castro, Sandinistas) or to terrorists (Palis, etc.).

Jennings was a terrorist-sympathizer and a propagandist for totalitarian regimes. I sometimes think that some of you must be very young not to know the favors Jennings did for the declared enemies of America for many decades.
50 posted on 08/11/2005 6:18:09 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson