[BikerNYC]

Funny how science haters cling to their beliefs regardless of the scientific evidence. Then they tell us that scientific conclusions must change to stay in conformity with their beliefs.

We would be better off if science haters clung to their personal beliefs and let science go about doing the job it does best - creating hypotheses that best explains the evidence at hand.

[Fido969]

I don't have any problem with that. I am just saying that science has become it's own religion, and some people put too much reliance on it.

Science doesn't explain everything.

[MagnoliaB]

I don't hate science and speaking objectively there's no way you can dispute facts like dinosaurs etc. I'm comfortable with the facts presented by science as far as the chronology of life forming on this planet and the order in which things took place.

Don't you think it odd that the people responsible for recording the bible knew this also and recorded life forming on this planet from amoeba to man accurately as it happened? How do you suppose they did this? It's all described in Genesis Chapter 1. and it follows in sequence how science says it happened. How do you think these primitive people that wrote the bible knew this?

God is infinite. Yet in Genesis it is reported that these things happened in 7 days which people (not me) think were literally 7, 24 hour days,as we know it. Later in the Good Book however, God's time is explained in further detail such as Psalm 90:4 and 11 Peter 3:8. I think those responsible for recording this extraordinary Book of Life did the best they could with their vocabulary, being primitive people and all, wouldn't you say? Or do you think they found some dinosaur bones and figured it out from there?

[RaceBannon]

Yes, the science haters who propose the nonsense of evolution.