Posted on 07/27/2005 3:51:42 PM PDT by Kaslin
WASHINGTON - A Democratic opponent of John Bolton asked Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on Wednesday whether the nominee for U.N. ambassador had testified to a grand jury about the leak of CIA operative's identity. ADVERTISEMENT
Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee say they want to determine whether Bolton was truthful when he wrote on a questionnaire for his confirmation hearing that he has not been interviewed in any recent investigations.
In a letter to Rice, Sen. Joseph Biden (news, bio, voting record), D-Del., referenced an MSNBC report from July 21 that Bolton was among State Department undersecretaries who "gave testimony" about a classified memo that has become an important piece of evidence in the leak investigation.
Biden asked Rice to tell the committee "whether Mr. Bolton did, in fact, appear before the grand jury, or whether he has been interviewed or otherwise asked to provide information by the special prosecutor or his staff in connection with this matter."
Several Bush administration officials have been interviewed by special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald in his quest to determine who leaked the covert identity of Valerie Plame to reporters and whether any laws were broken.
Plame is the wife of former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson, a critic of President Bush's Iraq policy.
A message left with the State Department was not immediately returned on Wednesday.
California Rep. Jane Harman (news, bio, voting record), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, has asked the State Department for two different versions of the memo from its bureau of intelligence and research that discussed Plame, a congressional aide said. The aide spoke on condition of anonymity because of the investigation's sensitivity.
The memo could have been the way someone in the White House learned — and then leaked — the information that Plame worked for the CIA and played a role in sending Wilson to Africa to explore whether Iraq was interested in obtaining uranium from Niger for nuclear weapons.
Part of the questionnaire Bolton filled out in March asked him whether he was "interviewed or asked to supply any information in connection with any administrative (including an inspector general), congressional or grand jury investigation within the past five years."
"He indicated in his form that he had not," said Sen. Barbara Boxer (news, bio, voting record), D-Calif.
She said it is unclear whether Bolton lied on his questionnaire because senators do not know if he testified before or after he signed the document — or at all.
The latest Democratic request to the administration for information about Bolton comes just two days before Congress is scheduled to leave Washington for a monthlong break.
With the Senate out of session, Bush could sidestep Congress and install Bolton in the U.N. post on a temporary basis.
Democrats have blocked Bolton's nomination for months. They have demanded that the administration turn over certain information about Bolton before they allow his nomination to proceed.
Republicans have twice attempted — and failed — to break the Democratic filibuster. There has been no sign of a breakthrough since the second attempt in June.
The White House has ruled out withdrawing Bolton's name.
In a later report, it was discovered that Biden copied the letter from Schmucky Schumer.
Surreal. The 'rats just don't stop. I hope W & Co. are taking names and have a big old shoe to drop on 'em...
But then that doesn't matter to the Democrats, does it.
Hopefully President Bush will make a recess appointment of Mr. Bolton during the summer recess. i hope when he deos he sends a message to all those Senators who opposed Bolton to stuff it up their backsides.
I hope so too. It's been way to long since he asked for his nomination
Recess appointment. If not, then just let the UN disappear.
That would work for me
bttt
Just to have a record for future reference:
Alan Foley's telephone interview about Bolton:
http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/Foley%2520Interview.pdf+Alan+foley&hl=en
Washington Post article about Alan Foley's interview:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/04/28/AR2005042801874.html
Looks like the congressional sources weren't exactly truthful (I'm shocked).
"The aide spoke on condition of anonymity because of the investigation's sensitivity."
ie. a good leak.
"He indicated in his form that he had not," said Sen. Barbara Boxer (news, bio, voting record), D-Calif. She said it is unclear whether Bolton lied on his questionnaire because senators do not know if he testified before or after he signed the document — or at all."
The "...whether Bolton lied..." part belies the obvious in regards to Boxers guilty-before-proven-innocent standard.
If she had any tack (I know, I know) she would have said "...it is unclear whether Bolton was truthful on his questionaire..."
Nope, it's the gravity of the accusation, not the accuracy, that counts...as long as it's not a Rat being accused. Then even a thousand court reporters witnessing the event, and the SCOTUS reporting it to the police, might not suffice to substantiate even the worst crime.
Under this rule, NAMBLA can accuse Bush of falsely starting a war on the basis of a rumor it picked up (among other things) in a Thai cathouse.
And under the same rule, Clinton could not be accused of rape even with the same sort of proof that convicts rapists every day under the laws he and his witch wife helped promote.
Your first link does not work.
Boxer is tacky and she lacks tact.
Oh, boy! Biden is FOS on this one.
All aspects of the Federal Grand Jury are SECRET!
The press can typically learn who, what, where, and when about grand juries, but some information is almost never released, such as the witness list.
Witnesses can out themselves by talking with reporters, but officers of the court cannot. Biden's asking C. Rice if Bolton testified is a no-no end run attempt around the law, and Rice should say so.
Sorry, it was a Google cache link and I thought it would work just going directly to the link. Try this one:
Alan Foley Senate interview:
http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:XzFYy19rY98J:www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/Foley%2520Interview.pdf+Alan+foley&hl=en
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.