Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Pass the word.
1 posted on 07/19/2005 8:36:00 PM PDT by Founding Father
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Founding Father

His first name isn't Chuck, it just rhymes with Chuck.


2 posted on 07/19/2005 8:37:30 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Founding Father
I would like to ask Chuckie a few questions in front of the people in his state. I bet some of his real answers would stun even the New York libs.
3 posted on 07/19/2005 8:40:38 PM PDT by satchmodog9 (Murder and weather are our only news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Founding Father

MOre of the same from the left, I'm really getting Fu%$&@(*
sick and tired of their Anti-American Socialist Crap!!


4 posted on 07/19/2005 8:41:48 PM PDT by 26lemoncharlie ('Cuntas haereses tu sola interemisti in universo mundo!')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Founding Father
Oh wait, nevermind. He voted yes with 95 other Senators.

Schumer wasn't a senator when Ginsburg was nominated. Other than that wee error, the blogger has a good point.

5 posted on 07/19/2005 8:42:29 PM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Founding Father

Before I read past the title... why isn't there a barf alert attached?


6 posted on 07/19/2005 8:42:48 PM PDT by RedBeaconNY (My cat has a cold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

ping


7 posted on 07/19/2005 8:43:14 PM PDT by King Prout (I'd say I missed ya, but that'd be untrue... I NEVER MISS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Founding Father

Great job. It might have been a "hangin' curve", but it is one which needed to be whacked in this manner. Thanks again.


8 posted on 07/19/2005 8:46:03 PM PDT by Hat-Trick (Do you trust a government that cannot trust you with guns?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Founding Father

I figured Chuckie would go into cardiac arrest no matter who got the nod from President Bush. Usually when Chuckie opposes someone it means that the person he is opposing has a strong pro-Second Amendment stance. Is this the case with Judge Roberts?


9 posted on 07/19/2005 8:46:46 PM PDT by billnaz (What part of "shall not be infringed" don't you understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Founding Father
Great find; I'd forgotten or rather blanked out Ruthie's confirmation hearings love-in.
11 posted on 07/19/2005 8:48:56 PM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Founding Father

Al Scum-auto had Up-Chuck Schumer's current Senate seat when Ginsburg was appointed.


12 posted on 07/19/2005 8:50:22 PM PDT by Clemenza (JJesus CChrist MMade SSeattle UUnder PProtest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Founding Father
I think a putz scumbag schmuck like schumer should answer some question like he puts to people that are respected for their integrity.What makes this schmuck thinks he is so smart he is dumber than a bag of sand.
13 posted on 07/19/2005 8:51:59 PM PDT by solo gringo (Liberal democrats And Flori-duh judges are parasites)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Founding Father

If Hillary Clinton wasn't in the Senate, I think Schumer would without a doubt run for President. Not even McCain loves exposure more than he does.


14 posted on 07/19/2005 9:07:23 PM PDT by JohnBDay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Founding Father

>>It's about like hunting cows in Southwest Oklahoma.<<

Lol!


15 posted on 07/19/2005 9:07:55 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Founding Father
Great post, thank you.

Praying that Boxer joins Schumer right out front where she can inflict immeasurable damage to the democrat's own positions.

17 posted on 07/19/2005 9:16:14 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gunslingr3

ping


20 posted on 07/19/2005 9:35:14 PM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Founding Father

Schumer is a bitter, ugly inquisitor, anything but funny. In case the American people missed him during the Waco hearings, they will get another chance and it will not be pretty. Schumer getting a lot of face time in this regard is a bonus for Republicans.


21 posted on 07/19/2005 9:45:04 PM PDT by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Founding Father
Schumer wasted no time letting everyone know that he was going to be the one to carry the water for the moonbats this go-round.

I thought that was Ted Kennedy's job to handle anything that has to do with water. He is the one with the most experience dating all the way back to Chappaquikdic.

22 posted on 07/19/2005 9:48:14 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Government is running amuck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Founding Father; flaglady47; Cboldt; BillF; kristinn; CyberAnt; Do not dub me shapka broham; ...

MUST-HAVE reference to thwart Democrat confirmation obstructionism and hypocrisy of Roberts for SCOTUS! Quotes are from the original post and post 19, with my comments in (parentheses).

"...Schumer wasted no time letting everyone know that he was going to be the one to carry the water for the moonbats this go-round. What was particularly stunning to me was the audacity Schumer displayed in the tactic he is apparently going to use during the upcoming character assass... I mean, confirmation hearings. It appears that Schumer will attempt to beat Roberts around the head for refusing to answer questions....

(We need to expose DNC hypocrisy in their confirming) Ruth Bader Ginsburg, whose confirmation hearings were the gold-standard for question refusal in confirmation hearings....

...While Senator Biden had said that a nominee should decline to answer questions about how she would decide a specific case, which suggests that only prospective cases are off-limits, Justice Ginsburg declined to answer questions about her views on both prospective and many historical Supreme Court cases. She also declined to answer questions (or gave non-responsive answers to questions) involving a number of controversial issues, hypothetical facts, or areas in which she is not an expert...."

(Ginsberg was the Evil Queen of stealth anti-American SCOTUS judges, check out her devilish weasel sidestepping of every important question!)

(According to posts downthread, Schumer was not yet in the Senate during the hearings and vote for Ginsberg but the major point is still valid.)

"What Roberts needs to do is study every answer that Ruth Ginsburg gave as she avoided giving answers on controversial subjects, and do exactly the same thing when it comes his turn. He should use her words as exactly as possible without actually parroting her, and then the Pubs, when the Dems attack him for not answering, should pull out the Ginsburg responses and say, hey, these answers were fine when you voted Ginsburg through, and Roberts is answering no differently than Ginsburg did, so you have no room to argue in this instance." -- post 19 by FlagLady47


30 posted on 07/20/2005 7:28:56 AM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Founding Father


Sen. Charles Schumer: Living proof they
threw away the wrong end at his bris.


40 posted on 07/20/2005 1:49:05 PM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Founding Father; All
Ahem.

Caption Chuckie Cheese


43 posted on 07/20/2005 2:31:52 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson