Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kennedy opposition carries risks for Supreme Court fight
Boston Globe ^ | July 17, 2005 | Rick Klein

Posted on 07/17/2005 11:23:03 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife


Senators Edward M. Kennedy and Christopher Dodd urged the president to nominate a mainstream conservative for the Supreme Court at a news conference earlier this month. (Reuters Photo)

WASHINGTON -- Senator Edward M. Kennedy's ringing baritone carried over the nearly empty Senate chamber, sounding a warning on a familiar subject. The liberal lion stood behind his desk in the chamber's last row and promised an aggressive and detailed grilling of whomever President Bush selects for the Supreme Court.

.....Cooperation and comity aside, Kennedy has made it clear that he will not hesitate to lead an effort to block a nominee whom he feels will not protect civil rights and personal freedoms. He was the first Democratic senator to hold a press conference after O'Connor announced that she is stepping down, where he warned that a filibuster will be in order if Bush nominates someone who ''threatens to roll back the rights and freedoms of the American people."

''I'm not going to change what I've stood for for 40 years in the Senate," Kennedy said. ''I take it very seriously with regards to the Supreme Court, because at the end of the day, this is the place where the rights and liberties of the American people are best protected."

There is a part of Kennedy that would appear to relish a fight, should it come to that. Shortly after the press conference he held in the aftermath of O'Connor's announcement, when a reporter mentioned to Kennedy that he has already been through 18 Supreme Court nominations, Kennedy quickly corrected him with a smile.

''It's 19, actually," he said, his eyes lighting up. ''Don't forget, when [William H.] Rehnquist went to chief justice, I led the fight on that one, too."

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; filibuster; justices; liberals; obstructionistdems; scotus; supremecourt; tedkennedy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: Cincinatus' Wife

Apparently the author can't distinguish a hippo from a lion.

It is doubtful that Hippo could fight his way out of a submerged Oldsmobile these days. He does seem to relish making a fool out of himself in public though, he jumps at every opportunity.


21 posted on 07/17/2005 11:46:36 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (Better a thousand Lawyers drive Fords, than one innocent person pay for their BMW .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

When I was a teen,I thought the House and Senate to be full of old foaggies(?). Now ,at 71, it seems that many,or their kin, are still there.


22 posted on 07/17/2005 11:49:11 AM PDT by jos65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
If Bush were to Select a moderate Conservative, it would be considered a victory by the Democrats.
23 posted on 07/17/2005 11:55:25 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Liberalism cannot survive in a free and open society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shawndell Green

You forget manslaughtering or maybe worse.


24 posted on 07/17/2005 11:58:02 AM PDT by golch1979 ("Captain Sobol, we solute the rank, not the man.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

I know.


25 posted on 07/17/2005 11:58:50 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Senator Edward M. Kennedy's ringing baritone carried over the nearly empty Senate chamber,

This drunken embarrassment sounds like, well, a drunken bum when he tries to talk. His staff types EVERYTHING he says on 100 brite paper, double-sized and triple-spaced. Not for nothing is he called the "Liberal Sealion of the Senate." Listen for yourself!

26 posted on 07/17/2005 12:01:11 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

######Kennedy has made it clear that he will not hesitate to lead an effort to block a nominee whom he feels will not protect civil rights and personal freedoms######


Why is the most vociferous collectivist demagogue in the party of collectivism allowed to portray himself as a proponent of personal freedom?


27 posted on 07/17/2005 12:01:16 PM PDT by puroresu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
“Zombies... they creep me out, man.”
28 posted on 07/17/2005 12:01:17 PM PDT by johnny7 (“'Deservin ain't got 'nothin to do with it!” -Will Money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Shawndell Green
Couldn't have said it better myself. Makes me cringe that he's from my state...I told me college daughter this morning that because of guys like Kennedy and Kerry, she should move to another state upon graduating. She whole heartedly agreed. What a shame.
29 posted on 07/17/2005 12:02:16 PM PDT by ladiesview61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Time and a whole lot of scotch sure have taken their toll
on him.


30 posted on 07/17/2005 12:02:19 PM PDT by Farmer Dean (Every time a toilet flushes,another liberal gets his brains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jos65

The Senate needs to be fumigated.


31 posted on 07/17/2005 12:10:05 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: puroresu
.........Conservatives who think progressives are misinformed idealists will forever be blind-sided by the malice of the left-by the cynicism of those who pride themselves on principle, by the viciousness of those who champion sensitivity, by the intolerance of those who call themselves liberal, and by the ruthless disregard for the well-being of the downtrodden by those who preen themselves as social saints. ........*** http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a39611fde5615.htm
32 posted on 07/17/2005 12:11:40 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I would venture to say that since us "redstaters" won the election then "mainstream" would be our definition. Therefore any nomination should be representative of our belief system.

Oh and Teddy over 62 million Americans voted for President Bush. Many voted for him because of this very issue. So sit you a$$ down STFU!

v/r
33 posted on 07/17/2005 12:12:21 PM PDT by PJammers (I can't help it... It's my idiom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

34 posted on 07/17/2005 12:13:55 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: PJammers

No kidding.

Bush was quite clear during the election of his desire to appoint true conservative justices to the Supreme Court.


35 posted on 07/17/2005 12:14:55 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

When is this fat flubber up for re-election? Certainly the Repubs in Mass can find someone decent enough to run a good race against him.


36 posted on 07/17/2005 12:15:21 PM PDT by admiralsn (- - | | - - / / - - \ \ - - \ \ - -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I welcome Kennedy standing up an waging a fight because this time Kennedy isn't going to be knocked on his fat Boston arse which is why it ain't gonna happen.


37 posted on 07/17/2005 12:19:45 PM PDT by hflynn ( Soros wouldn't make any sense even if he spelled his name backwards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: admiralsn
Forget about the MA Republican Party... it's like a German division in 1945.

It exists only on paper.

38 posted on 07/17/2005 12:19:59 PM PDT by johnny7 (“'Deservin ain't got 'nothin to do with it!” -Will Money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Senators Edward M. Kennedy and Christopher Dodd urged the president to nominate a mainstream conservative for the Supreme Court...

You know, I don't even have to read the article to know that the Democrats should lose this fight. Listen to what they are saying, that the President should nominate a "mainstream conservative." If the Senate was Democrat, do you think that the word "conservative" would ever be in that sentence? Would the Democrats give even that small amount of a concession to us, were they in power? Hell, no!

The Democrats are using this language because they know they have no power here. They can't stop the President or the Senate from confirming a real conservative, so they are using their mouthpieces in the MSM to beg for scraps. They hope that some Republicans will be too concerned about being painted as "big meanies" for pushing through a good nominee that they will knuckle under. And, sadly, they are probably right.

The fight now isn't with the Democrats. They have no power. The fight now is with the weak-kneed RINOs in the Senate. That's who our enemy is at this point...

39 posted on 07/17/2005 12:20:28 PM PDT by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Still teaching... or a reasonable facsimile thereof...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Kennedy = Lying King


40 posted on 07/17/2005 12:30:27 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (The MSM is trying to make us believe, Judith Miller is in jail to protect Karl Rove!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson