Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why has U.S. been spared?
Orlando Sentinel ^ | 08 July 2005 | Peter A. Brown

Posted on 07/08/2005 11:01:56 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln

The London bombing once again begs the question: Why haven't terrorists struck the United States in the past four years?

Certainly the effects of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks are still felt by Americans.

Unfortunately, terrorists have succeeded in changing how we live our daily lives.

Americans worry more about being blown up now than when thousands of Soviet ICBMs with multiple nuclear warheads were pointed at the United States.

These days, we live under the constant fear of being the next victim of a random act, a mentality that makes us more fearful and less generous to strangers and forces changes in behavior that cost us all time and money.

Nonetheless, it is useful to ponder why the bad guys haven't struck within the United States itself since 9-11.

It certainly is not because Osama & Co. hate us less than they once did.

(Excerpt) Read more at orlandosentinel.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: jihadinamerica; london; londonattack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-195 next last

Lando

1 posted on 07/08/2005 11:01:56 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

Possibly because the Islamicists have realized that attacking the US was counterproductive to their cause.


2 posted on 07/08/2005 11:02:52 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Because we've aggressively pursued illegal aliens and controlled our borders?
3 posted on 07/08/2005 11:03:15 AM PDT by null and void (You'll learn more on FR by accident, than other places by design)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

Why has U.S. been spared?

al Qaida doesn't want to piss off Howard Dean. YEEEEEEARGH!
4 posted on 07/08/2005 11:04:08 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (If this isn't the End Times it certainly is a reasonable facsimile...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

Because they're planning something big--on the order of 9-11 or worse.


5 posted on 07/08/2005 11:04:46 AM PDT by Pharmboy (There is no positive correlation between the ability to write, act, sing or dance and being right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

We haven't, their Senate sleeper cell was activated and then instantly attacked. He apologized soon after, but may be preparing for another assault. Be vigilant!


6 posted on 07/08/2005 11:05:04 AM PDT by Darkwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

7 posted on 07/08/2005 11:05:18 AM PDT by John Filson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

I believe attacks have been stopped by arresting people. It just doesn't get much publicity, which is how it should be. But we can't let our guard down. I don't think it's because the terrorists have given up. Just waiting...


8 posted on 07/08/2005 11:05:59 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

It's because we won't go wobbly.


9 posted on 07/08/2005 11:06:02 AM PDT by AmishDude (Once you go black hat, you never go back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
I've wondered about this myself, and as each day goes by without any sign of Osama bin Laden I sometimes wonder if the U.S. hasn't reached out and cut a deal with him or his surrogates.

At any rate, the fact that we've gone almost four years since 9/11 without a major terrorist attack on U.S. soil is not necessarily an indication of any kind of success. On September 10 of 2001, one could have stood up and said (truthfully) that there hadn't been a terrorist attack on U.S. soil in either five years (if you want to count TWA Flight 800) or six years (Oklahoma City).

10 posted on 07/08/2005 11:08:03 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852
I believe attacks have been stopped by arresting people.

I'd be much happier if we'd just kill them.

11 posted on 07/08/2005 11:08:12 AM PDT by null and void (You'll learn more on FR by accident, than other places by design)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: John Filson

I cannot believe this graphic for one simple reason, NJ is NOT red!


12 posted on 07/08/2005 11:08:34 AM PDT by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Americans worry more about being blown up now than when thousands of Soviet ICBMs with multiple nuclear warheads were pointed at the United States.

As a generation Xer, and child of the 80's, I have to vehemently disagree with this statement.
13 posted on 07/08/2005 11:10:41 AM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

Americans worry more about being blown up now than when thousands of Soviet ICBMs with multiple nuclear warheads were pointed at the United States.

These days, we live under the constant fear of being the next victim of a random act, a mentality that makes us more fearful and less generous to strangers and forces changes in behavior that cost us all time and money.

I sincerely doubt this generalization. American's were much more afraid of nuclear holocaust than a bunch of silly, ignorant, sheep herders with AK47s and Semtex.

This is just a liberal pushing the liberal scare tactic. Americans are prepared for terrorist scum, and we've rounded up a number of local operatives, unlike the UK and Europe, who keep welcoming them to their countries, and calling them freedom fighters, and heros.


14 posted on 07/08/2005 11:11:11 AM PDT by wvobiwan (Liberal Slogan: "News maganizes don't kill people, Muslims do." - Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

I think we have been spared because the islamderthals have something extra special planned for us and the timing isn't right yet.


15 posted on 07/08/2005 11:11:15 AM PDT by cripplecreek (I zot trolls for fun and profit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

This was addressed in an article today on techcentralstation. Basically, the Islamofascists are conducting a blood feud against us, with the intent of constantly injuring or terrorizing the western world in general. If they hammer against any one region repeatedly, it becomes easier to wipe them out/thin their numbers, as we are doing in Iraq. If they strike sporadically around the world, with gaps between strikes to allow life to more or less resume, they do more psychological damage. They hit us once, and are now going elsewhere, having gotten us to devote tremendous resources to closing the barn door long after the horse has left. They won't be back here again (per this theory) until we have stopped expecting them to strike here.


16 posted on 07/08/2005 11:11:42 AM PDT by Little Pig (Is it time for "Cowboys and Muslims" yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
These don't count as attacks or potential ones on American soil?:

1993 (Oct.): Killing of U.S. soldiers in Somalia.
1996 (June): Truck bombing at Khobar Towers barracks in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, killed 19 Americans.
1998 (Aug.): Bombing of U.S. embassies in East Africa; 224 killed, including 12 Americans.
1999 (Dec.): Plot to bomb millennium celebrations in Seattle foiled when customs agents arrest an Algerian smuggling explosives into the U.S.
2000 (Oct.): Bombing of the USS Cole in port in Yemen; 17 U.S. sailors killed.

17 posted on 07/08/2005 11:11:47 AM PDT by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Nonetheless, it is useful to ponder why the bad guys haven't struck within the United States itself since 9-11.

The fact that it is not possible to prevent private citizens from profiling probably has a lot to do with it.

18 posted on 07/08/2005 11:12:15 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws spawned the runaway federal health care monopoly and fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

I suspect most of the AQ people are spending their time running from "The Ghost Soldiers".

Those who are stll alive, anyway.


19 posted on 07/08/2005 11:12:29 AM PDT by TexanToTheCore (Rock the pews, Baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
"These days, we live under the constant fear of being the next victim of a random act, a mentality that makes us more fearful and less generous to strangers and forces changes in behavior that cost us all time and money"

This guy Peter Brown needs to speak for himself, I don't live in fear. I go out in public, fly on the airlines, use mass transit. Does Abu Musab al Zaqari or Osama bin-Laden?

20 posted on 07/08/2005 11:12:49 AM PDT by MJY1288 (Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-195 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson