Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tape Shows General Clark Linking Iraq and Al Qaeda
NYT ^ | January 12, 2004 | EDWARD WYATT

Posted on 06/29/2005 1:08:57 PM PDT by Peach

Tape Shows General Clark Linking Iraq and Al Qaeda NY Times ^ | Jan. 12, 2004 | EDWARD WYATT

MANCHESTER, N.H., Jan. 11 — Less than a year before he entered the race for the Democratic nomination for president, Gen. Wesley K. Clark said that he believed there was a connection between the Iraqi government and Al Qaeda.

The statement by General Clark in October 2002 as he endorsed a New Hampshire candidate for Congress is a sign of how the general's position on Iraq seems to have changed over time, though he insists his position has been consistent.

"Certainly there's a connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda," he said in 2002. "It doesn't surprise me at all that they would be talking to Al Qaeda, that there would be some Al Qaeda there or that Saddam Hussein might even be, you know, discussing gee, I wonder since I don't have any scuds and since the Americans are coming at me, I wonder if I could take advantage of Al Qaeda? How would I do it? Is it worth the risk? What could they do for me?"

At numerous campaign events in the past three months and in a book published last year, General Clark has asserted that there was no evidence linking Iraq and Al Qaeda. He has also accused the Bush administration of executing "a world-class bait-and-switch," by using the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, as an excuse to invade Iraq.

At a town hall meeting here on Jan. 4, for example, General Clark said, "There was no imminent threat from Iraq, nor was Iraq connected with Al Qaeda."

"If Iraq had been there as the base of Al Qaeda to organize and train everybody, then maybe we could have justified the attack on Iraq," he added.

In an interview, General Clark said his more recent remarks were not inconsistent with what he said in 2002. In those remarks, he said, he was trying to explain that based on his knowledge of how the intelligence community works, low-level contacts almost certainly existed between Iraq and Al Qaeda, But, he said, that does not mean that Iraq had anything to do with the Sept. 11 attacks.

The 2002 comments, he said, were based in part on a letter to Senator Bob Graham, Democrat of Florida and chairman of the Intelligence Committee, from George J. Tenet, director of central intelligence, which said that the C.I.A. had credible reporting that Al Qaeda leaders sought contacts in Iraq who could help them acquire weapons of mass destruction. The content of the letter was reported in a front-page article in The New York Times on Oct. 9, 2002, the day that General Clark made the comments at the New Hampshire endorsement.

"I never thought there would be any evidence linking Sept. 11 and Saddam Hussein," General Clark said. "Everything I had learned about Saddam Hussein told me that he would be the last person Al Qaeda would trust or that he would trust them."

"All I was saying is that it would be naïve to say that there weren't any contacts," he said. "But that's a far cry from saying there was any connection between the events of 9/11 and Saddam Hussein."

In his most recent book, "Winning Modern Wars," (Public Affairs, 2003), General Clark states, "No evidence thus far suggests any link between Saddam Hussein and the terrorists of Al Qaeda."

On Thursday, Secretary of State Colin L. Powell said that despite his assertions to the United Nations last year, he had no concrete evidence of a link between the terrorist organization and Iraq.

The general's 2002 comments appeared on a home video of the press conference in Nashua at which he endorsed Katrina Swett for New Hampshire's Second Congressional District. A copy of the videotape was made available by a rival presidential candidate's campaign.

General Clark's appearance with Ms. Swett has come up before in the presidential race. He advised her at the time that if she were in Congress, she should vote for the resolution authorizing the use of force in Iraq. Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut used that statement to accuse General Clark of inconsistency on Iraq. General Clark subsequently said that at the time he did not understand exactly what was in the resolution and would have voted against it.

Similarly, on the first day of his campaign, General Clark said that he probably would have voted for the resolution on Iraq. He later said he "bobbled" the question and has asserted that he made clear well before the start of the war his belief that Iraq was not an imminent danger to the United States and, therefore, that an attack was not justified at that time.

General Clark had known Ms. Swett and her husband, Richard N. Swett, a former congressman and ambassador to Denmark, when they lived in Denmark and General Clark lived in Belgium as Supreme Allied Commander of NATO.

In an interview, Ms. Swett, who is a national co-chairwoman of Mr. Lieberman's campaign, said she recalled General Clark as "saying pretty unequivocally" that a link existed between Iraq and Al Qaeda.

Within days of the endorsement, General Clark was reported to be considering a run for the Democratic nomination. He had come to New Hampshire as a guest of George Bruno, a former ambassador to Belize who is now a co-chairman of General Clark's campaign in that state.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: clark; liar; wesley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 06/29/2005 1:08:57 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Peach

ping


2 posted on 06/29/2005 1:09:58 PM PDT by ocr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Looks like the NYTimes is trying to give Hillary a boost.


3 posted on 06/29/2005 1:12:31 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

This in the NY Times!!!!!


4 posted on 06/29/2005 1:12:47 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier

There's a reason for that. And it ain't because they're trying to drum up support for the war.


5 posted on 06/29/2005 1:16:00 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard ("Watergate doesn't bother me. Does your conscience bother you, Mr. Felt?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ocr1

General Clark is such a crap weasel

He's a disgrace to his uniform


6 posted on 06/29/2005 1:16:58 PM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Last night Clark was saying our commanders on the ground had all the troops they needed while Biden was saying "TO A PERSON" they were saying they don't. These people don't know whether they're coming or going. Clark's tie was askew and he had that crazy-eyes stare of his. What a lunatic!


7 posted on 06/29/2005 1:17:44 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Don't suffer fools gladly? I don't suffer them at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Time mag, special edition, Sept 24, 2001

Bob Graham, CHAIRMAN OF THE SENATE INTELL COMMITTEE, says there is "some evidence" that Saddam was involved, evidence that is "credible enough that you can't take Iraq off the list".

What was that evidence Mr. Graham?

I resent this constant manipulation and lies about the President making up a pretext for war out of whole cloth.


8 posted on 06/29/2005 1:18:25 PM PDT by roses of sharon (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

Yeah maybe trying to support Judith Miller's stance against her revealing her sources under judicial request. The Slimes believed Iraq had WMD's up until it was expedient to say they did not have them.


9 posted on 06/29/2005 1:19:22 PM PDT by bubman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Ha! Gotcha, Wes!

(Katrina Swett is the daughter of California congressman Tom Lantos. Thank God both she and her husband are out of NH politics.)


10 posted on 06/29/2005 1:20:31 PM PDT by LibFreeOrDie (L'chaim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Clark is nuts. He darned near started a world war when he worked for Clinton.


11 posted on 06/29/2005 1:20:38 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier

This is 1 1/2 years old.


12 posted on 06/29/2005 1:20:59 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

The place to bookmark, for those interested, is the last link because it includes all the other links:

Despite what Wesley Clark said last night on FNC, he was pushing an Iraq/AQ connection.
Tape Shows General Wesley Clark linking Iraq and AQ
January 12, 2004. The New York Times.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1056113/posts

The media certainly were pushing Iraq as being connected to AQ and possibly behind 9/11 shortly after September 11, 2001. A compilation of media comments and articles:
November 17, 2003
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/984758/posts

Article details the number of terrorists who have attacked America in the past and taken refuge in Iraq. Loaded with interesting bullet points.
March 14, 2004. Scripps Howard News Service via NewsMax.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/1097521/posts?page=1

How the Networks Pretend to Ignore their own Reporting from the 1990's.
June 17, 2004. Media Research Center
http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2004/cyb20040617.asp

Iraq and AQ agree to cooperate. The federal indictment against OBL working in concert with Iraq and Iran is mentioned.
November 1998. The New York Times
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/985906/posts

ABC news reports on the Osama/Saddam connections
January 14, 1999. ABC News
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1229608/posts?page=1

Intercepted call links Saddam to AQ.
February 7, 2002. The Telegraph
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/837605/posts

Families sue Iraq over 9/11. Thousands of 9/11 victims and family members sue Iraq based on evidence that Iraq knew the attacks were coming, approved the attacks, and supported Al Qaeda for a decade. The lawsuit also notes Iraq's involvement in the first WTC attack.
September 5, 2002. CBS.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/09/05/september11/main520874.shtml

Saddam and OBL Make a Pact.
February 10, 2003. The New Yorker.
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?030210fa_fact

List of newspaper articles written in the 90's which mention the world's concern regarding the growing relationship between OBL and Saddam.
July 14, 2003. FrontPage Magazine.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/946809/posts?page=1

That and more here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1327993/posts





13 posted on 06/29/2005 1:23:32 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
"Looks like the NYTimes is trying to give Hillary a boost."

Oh, yes. The Hillary Kneepad Patrol is at full tilt.

14 posted on 06/29/2005 1:32:34 PM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%; WhistlingPastTheGraveyard; Reactionary

This article was published over a year and a half ago. They were trying to help Kerry at that time, not Hillary.


15 posted on 06/29/2005 1:36:09 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Peach
MSM: This is old news, can't we just move on?

Peach, outstanding work today--if you have a pinglist for these golden oldies, please add me to it, as I have to log off for awhile soon. I'd hate to miss any of them.

16 posted on 06/29/2005 2:06:45 PM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

I just really have the entire list, which is here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1327993/posts


17 posted on 06/29/2005 2:07:34 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Peach
I hate to diss a general, especially one with his credentials. Unfortunately, his rhetoric and contradictory positions impel me to consider that the man might simply be a fraud in numerous ways. Certainly he is a hypocrite.

Hey, John Kerry is considered by the media to be a war hero and most of us know better than to believe that BS!.
18 posted on 06/29/2005 2:13:32 PM PDT by Radix (I was looking for a Tag Line when I found this one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Radix

I can't remember the details, but he darned near started WWIII and Clinton basically fired the guy. He has an ego bigger than the state of Texas.


19 posted on 06/29/2005 2:15:23 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

Bump


20 posted on 06/29/2005 2:45:45 PM PDT by pushforbush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson