Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judicial Activism Strikes Again
American Conservative Union - Email ^ | June 23, 2005 | Jesse Benton

Posted on 06/24/2005 12:35:34 AM PDT by CyberAnt

PRESS RELEASE

Supreme Court Rules Government can seize your home

ALEXANDRIA , VA – The American Conservative Union, the nation's oldest and largest Conservative grass roots organization, sharply condemned today’s highly controversial 5-4 Supreme Court ruling that local governments may use eminent domain to take people’s homes and businesses and turn them over to private developers.

The case, titled Kelo et al v. City of New London, was brought by homeowners in New London, Connecticut where officials plan to tear down a neighborhood community near the Thames river to make way for an office complex. City planners, backed by the liberal National League of Cities, argued that throwing the homeowners off their property would create jobs and generate more tax revenue for the city. Many of the affected citizens have deep roots in their community, including a married couple in their 80s who have lived in the same home for more than 50 years.

"It is outrageous to think that the government can take away your home any time it wants to build a shopping mall,” said ACU Chairman David Keene. "Today’s Supreme Court ruling is a slap in the face to property owners everywhere.”

The Institute for Justice, a public interest law firm committed to protecting property rights, estimates that over 10,000 homes nationwide are in danger of being destroyed by aggressive local governments. The Kelo ruling sets a precedent that officials may proceed with their plans to seize the homes of private citizens to foster whatever they conceive to be the “common good” and generate more tax income to fuel big government spending programs.

“Liberal, activist judges will continue to violate the rights of individuals in favor of big government and special interests,” continued Keene. “To help protect property rights, Americans must push for a fair, originalist judge to be appointed to the Supreme Court when the next vacancy arises.”

----------

COPYRIGHT © 2004 AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION | PRIVACY POLICY 1007 Cameron Street | Alexandria, VA 22314 | 703-836-8602 | Fax 703-836-8606 | acu@conservative.org


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: acu; eminentdomain; kelo; tyranny; tyrrany; ussc

1 posted on 06/24/2005 12:35:34 AM PDT by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

Which party will win the foot-draggin race over the action to be taken as a result of this? I pick the RATS. They'd much rather defend the "rights" of terorists than US citizens, any day.


2 posted on 06/24/2005 12:42:53 AM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt; All
To me, these are the defining issues of our times:

-Men(ace) in Black? SCOTUS goes Rogue...--

-Useless Eaters vs The Death Cult--

-Thunder on the Border-- (Minuteman Project)--

1- an unaccountable Judiciary.
2- whose life is it, anyway? Yours, or someone else's?
3- whose Country is it?

There are other vital issues, of course- but these three will determine just who we really are as a nation.

3 posted on 06/24/2005 12:48:12 AM PDT by backhoe ("It's so easy to spend someone else's money." [My Dad, circa 1958])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

And .. as usual my dear friend .. you have hit the nail on the head.

I've been reading "Men in Black" - very interesting book. It sure points out how much information WAS NEVER TAUGHT to our children during the last few years.


4 posted on 06/24/2005 12:52:03 AM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

They are freaking out over on DU. They don't seem to get the inconsistancies of the liberal position.

For years the Demos have been fighting to take away individual rights and subordinate people to the government, all in the name of protecting them with the nanny state. They can't figure out why the liberal justices have done this. As my liberal sister said, "We ARE the government. People need to be regulated".

Now they find they are being regulated out of all their freedoms. They are trying to find comfort in that many of the liberal justices were put in place by Republicans. Believe me, if the pubbies knew Souder was as liberal as he is, he would never have been put in there. And Ruthie is their baby.


5 posted on 06/24/2005 1:01:08 AM PDT by I still care (America is not the problem - it is the solution..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I still care

Unbelievably bad news. Property rights are the cornerstone of this country. It also blows my mind about DU, they are shocked the the four most conservative justices were the ones against this. Sometimes I feel like this whole country could use a refresher on politics and government 101, and the stances of the politic parties, and the political systems of totalitarian states.


6 posted on 06/24/2005 1:35:07 AM PDT by neptune235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
Anyone looking for insight into the bigger picture in what is happening here, this article is a must-read:

When Tyranny Came to America"

Print it. Study it. And pass it along. And pray it's not already to late to turn back the hellish tide of socialism that is sweeping across our nation at an ever-increasing pace.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

7 posted on 06/24/2005 2:31:39 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neptune235
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated"

Appears that taking private property from an individual and transferring it to another individual is OK if the currently elected officials say so. What happens after the next election cycle. Can the home owner get a new set of officials elected who will take the land from the developers and sell it back to them? When will the cycle end?
8 posted on 06/24/2005 2:52:39 AM PDT by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

bttt


9 posted on 06/24/2005 8:35:01 AM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson