Lancet Calls For Caution In Touting Potential For Embryonic Stem Cells

06.14.05

[Coleus]

Lancet Calls For Caution In Touting
Potential For Embryonic Stem Cells 

     A prestigious British medical journal calls recent headlines that claim research using embryonic stem cells will lead to cures for an almost unending number of diseases to be "sensationalist" and "hype" even though the journal favors embryo-destructive research. In an editorial in the June 4 edition titled "Stem cell research: hope and hype," The Lancet noted the findings of a recent meeting of researchers in London, also supportive of embryonic stem cell research, who found that, "no safe and effective stem cell therapy will be widely available for at least a decade, and possibly longer."

     Recent news that South Korean scientists successfully cloned a human embryo has increased the visibility of bold claims by those favoring embryo-destructive research that miracle cures for everything from Alzheimer's to diabetes are around the corner if such research is allowed. Recent debate in the House of Representative over legislation that would provide federal funding for embryo-destructive research was filled with emotional pleas from House members on both sides of the aisle who claimed that such funding offered the best hope for family members struck with a variety of diseases.

     The Lancet also published a commentary from Neil Scolding, a British neurology researcher at the University of Bristol, highlighting the numerous technical problems with embryonic stem cell research. "[A]n increasing appreciation of the hazards of embryonic stem cells has rightly prevented the emergence or immediate prospect of any clinical therapies based on such cells. The natural propensity of embryonic stem cells to form [tumors], their exhibition of chromosomal abnormalities, and abnormalities in cloned mammals all present difficulties." Scolding says that the "prospect of having to clone . . . every patient requiring therapy is surely unrealistic" and notes that the recent "Korean report of cloning human embryos for stem cells used almost 250 human eggs in generating a single stem cell line."

     Scolding goes on to say that these problems only compound the ethical concerns that come from embryo-destructive research. "[W]hat is unarguable is that the human embryo is alive and is human, and intentionally ending the life of one human being for the potential benefit of others (ie, for research) is not territory to which mainstream clinical researchers have hitherto sought claim - or which ethically conscious objectors could ever concede."

     Scolding insists that this does not mean that the future of stem cells is dead. "Far from it, for the embryonic stem cell story forms only one aspect," he says, remarking that adult stem cell therapies have overcome some of the early challenges to their effectiveness. "Fortunately, for the now highly expectant patient, reports of the death of adult stem cells were greatly exaggerated." Scolding points to successful treatments using bone marrow-derived stem cells as well as recent achievements using adult stem cells to treat patients with corneal disease. "The next few years, not decades, will show whether adult stem cell treatments are to join the mainstream therapeutic arsenal," he said in what could be seen as a reference to the uncertain future of embryonic stem cells.

Copyright 2005---Culture of Life Foundation. Permission granted for unlimited use. Credit required.

Culture of Life Foundation, 1413 K Street, NW, Suite 1000, Washington DC 20005
Phone: (202) 289-2500  Fax: (202) 289-2502 E-mail: clf@culture-of-life.org Website: http://www.culture-of-life.org

[Coleus]

Dear Colleague,

One of the saddest aspects of the debate over embryo-destructive research is the false hope that has been given to thousands of sick people who are told that a cure for their disease is imminent. A new editorial and a more in depth article from the medical journal The Lancet makes it clear that if successful treatments ever come from embryonic stem cells they are a long-way off and that adult stem cells continue to hold the most potential for the near future. Keep in mind that this is coming from a journal that supports embryo-destructive research. Spread the word.

Yours sincerely,
Austin Ruse
President

[steenkeenbadges]

STEM cell research has produced numerous positive results for patients with paralysis and parkinsons. EMBRYONIC stem cell research has produced ZERO - zip - zilch -nada - bupkiss in 23 friggin years!

Do a google search for embryonic stem cell studies, case studies, research, clinical applications - anything - and all you'll find is words like, "promising", "experts hope to...", "possible", etc., etc., etc.

Follow the money, the culture of death and the Liberal Establishment and it's easy to draw the correct conclusion. Ghouls.

[Coleus]

EMBRYONIC stem cell research has produced ZERO - zip - zilch -nada - bupkiss in 23 friggin years! >>>

Just tumors and death to the patient and death to the embryo.

[steenkeenbadges]

Adult Stem Cells have produced results. Please re-read my post. It's the EMBRYONIC stem cell research that's gone nowhere but gets all the money & press.

[little jeremiah]

later pingout.

[Coleus]

Right, I agree with your post.

[little jeremiah]

Moral Absolutes Ping.

Since embryonic stem cells don't seem to do any good, it makes you wonder why certain groups/people are so gung ho about them.

Could it just be that they are enamored with death?

Freepmail me if you want on/off this pinglist.

[steenkeenbadges]

:-)) Did you see the post about the liberal churches losing membership in droves? Gave me a lift!