Skip to comments.
Largest, US Sexuality Survey In History Shows Gays Far More Likely To Engage In Criminal Activities
LifeSite ^
| June 13, 2005
Posted on 06/14/2005 8:21:44 AM PDT by NYer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 last
To: NYer
81
posted on
06/15/2005 12:31:33 PM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(Democrats: The other white meat.)
To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping.
Highly interesting article. Although the writer gets it wrong in the first paragraph - homosexuals are twice as likely to be engaged in illegal activity. Read the thread, too.
So the CDC had this info for a year and sat on it. Anyone surprised?
Freepmail me if you want on/off this pinglist.
82
posted on
06/15/2005 6:22:24 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it.)
To: dangus
Someone probably already told you, but it's an increase of 100%. Twice as likely. That IS significant.
83
posted on
06/15/2005 6:25:31 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it.)
To: dangus
Note to self - read the whole thread before making unnecessary comments!
Sorry!
84
posted on
06/15/2005 6:26:59 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it.)
To: libs_kma
It seems to me that if a man is willing to get excited by another mans rear, and act on it, then that doesn't leave many things to fall into the realm of something they wouldn't do. Why would someone think illegal activities would be excluded? Yes!
85
posted on
06/15/2005 11:06:59 PM PDT
by
DBeers
(†)
To: Modernman
Not to quibble Stop quibbling.
86
posted on
06/15/2005 11:08:13 PM PDT
by
DBeers
(†)
To: NYer
I'll join in the quibbling. The survey is based on self-reporting, not a document background check.
So gays appear to be twice as likely to admit to having been booked, unless the study followed up and did a records check to see if the self-reports were true.
87
posted on
06/20/2005 6:40:31 PM PDT
by
DBrow
(www.maps.org)
To: DBrow
I'll join in the quibbling. The survey is based on self-reporting, not a document background check. Homosexuality is based upon self-reporting -are you suggesting any study involving the advancement of the homosexual agenda is necessarily flawed!
88
posted on
09/10/2005 7:14:42 PM PDT
by
DBeers
(†)
To: NYer
Two words - Svend Robinson
To: DBeers
Hmmm, well, yes. It would be easy to exaggerate, wouldn't it, if there were no objective test?
But homosexuality is not only detected by self-report. If someone, "X", told me that they had observed "Y" in homosexual behaviour, or had been approached for homosexual favors, that would be subjective, but third-party- not a self-report.
Then there's homosexual rape that goes to trial and a conviction is issued- pretty objective but not 100% certain.
And, while trying to avoid being too graphic, there are lots of Web pictures that show physical consequences of repeated homosexual relations.
Medical and court records and third-party testimonials can lend some objectivity. Relying on someone to report their own status is IMO unreliable.
90
posted on
09/11/2005 8:20:05 AM PDT
by
DBrow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson