1 posted on
06/05/2005 12:59:53 PM PDT by
jern
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: jern
When the law legalizes theft is it any wonder acts of self defense against that theft are illegal too?
2 posted on
06/05/2005 1:03:22 PM PDT by
Nateman
(Morality 180 degrees out of phase with reality: welcome to the left side!)
To: Dog
3 posted on
06/05/2005 1:03:58 PM PDT by
Mo1
(Hey GOP ---- Not one Dime till Republicans grow a Spine !!)
To: jern
It's such an outrageous law. They make it so that you have to report any transaction over $10,000, and then charge you if you make withdrawls under $10,000.
4 posted on
06/05/2005 1:06:03 PM PDT by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: jern
Ali A. Odeh, 36 [...] also known as Ali Abdel Latif Mbarak and Ali A. M. ThatataAny time you're delaing with someone who feels the "need" for multiple aliases: start with a presumption of guilt, and move forward from that point.
6 posted on
06/05/2005 1:06:23 PM PDT by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-G-d, PRO-LIFE..." -- FR founder Jim Robinson)
To: jern
Federal authorities have charged a Clinton man
Explains everything.
7 posted on
06/05/2005 1:07:50 PM PDT by
JamminJAY
(This space for rent)
To: jern
I've got two letters for you IRS. F U Yes, F U and the three horses you road in on, the House, the Senate and the Presidency. This is not supposed to be a socialist nation. Get it? Obviously not!
That being said, the names involved in this case cause me to ponder if there isn't a little more to this case than simple tax avoidance.
8 posted on
06/05/2005 1:08:07 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
To: jern
Hmmmm........4.3 million......36 years old? So what business was he involved in?
The math average is $9287.25 over what period of time I don't know. But I'm sure he was on a first name basis with the tellers.
9 posted on
06/05/2005 1:09:03 PM PDT by
BIGLOOK
(I once opposed keelhauling but recently have come to my senses.)
To: jern
Federal authorities have charged a Clinton man with fixing bank transactions Too bad....... I was really hoping the phrase "a Clinton man" meant a Clinton X42 bag-man.
14 posted on
06/05/2005 1:16:05 PM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: jern
Aw you left out the best part!
"He could receive a maximum of five years in prison per charge against him."
2315 years in the slammer!
To: jern
Assistant U.S. Attorney John Bruce said a bank must report a transaction of $10,000 or more to the IRS. This guy appears to need some updated training. $10,000 used to be a magic number, but it hasn't been for several years. An activity can require a bank to generate a SAR even if it is under $10,000.00.
20 posted on
06/05/2005 1:28:31 PM PDT by
PAR35
To: jern
on the one hand, I wonder what this fellow with these three names was doiung with all that money.
on the other hand, I really don't like this mandatory transaction report BS
24 posted on
06/05/2005 1:42:00 PM PDT by
King Prout
(I'd say I missed ya, but that'd be untrue... I NEVER MISS)
To: jern
Can you say "likely terrorist bagman"?
Yes, I thought you could!
27 posted on
06/05/2005 1:47:17 PM PDT by
Gritty
("Mujahideen operate with strict adherence to rules of engagement of Allah and Muhammad-Abu Zarqawi)
To: jern
Charged with a crime for withdrawing his own money?
Welcome to the New America.
29 posted on
06/05/2005 1:49:04 PM PDT by
B Knotts
To: Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; Bernard; BJClinton; BlackbirdSST; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
To: jern
Well, if they want him to have to report on transactions UNDER $10K, why don't they get legislators to enact that into law? Until then, he's complying with the existing law, so they should mind their own bidness.
33 posted on
06/05/2005 2:12:19 PM PDT by
Still Thinking
(Disregard the law of unintended consequences at your own risk.)
To: jern
Obvious question: Was it his money, legally? If so, what is the illegality here?
To: jern
"Ali Abdel Latif Mbarak and Ali A. M. Thatata, made 463 withdrawals from July 13, 2000, to June 28, 2004"
Ali Abdel Latif and Ali A.M. are both the followers of the Book of Jihad (i.e they are Muslims) and plus they made these big money transactions. Hmmmm, that tells there is more to this story. Possibly, they may be planning to use this money for the violent Jihad for the moongod?
To: jern
Oh, please, please, let me guess what his family and friends will say..."We do not believe this, he was framed by the government for being Muslim, he is such a devoted father, husband, brother, uncle, friend...etc" as they always say when it comes to these people being arrested.
44 posted on
06/05/2005 2:38:57 PM PDT by
Quinotto
(On matters of style,swim with the current,on matters of principle stand like a rock-Thomas Jefferson)
To: jern
actually what he was doing is what drug dealers do as part of money laundering to legitimize funds.
I suspect there is more to this story than can be reported in the media.
To: jern
If the limit is $10K, then why is the government monitoring his $9.9K withdrawls.
47 posted on
06/05/2005 2:54:05 PM PDT by
Half Vast Conspiracy
(If their Chief of police is okay with it, I am guessing that we should probably be okay with it.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson