Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster
2 posted on
05/20/2005 9:48:32 AM PDT by
cake_crumb
(Leftist Credo: "One Wing to Rule Them all and to the Dark Side Bind Them")
To: TigerLikesRooster
They once asked Clinton if he wore Boxers or Jockeys, at least they wont have to ask Saddam.
IMO the Sun somehow got hold of these pictures, saw a chance to embarass the US and ran with it, The story that the US military gave these pictures to them is so much horse dung.
To: TigerLikesRooster
so he was getting changed....With all the hoopla about it I was expecting something worse.
4 posted on
05/20/2005 9:51:56 AM PDT by
tfecw
(Vote Democrat, It's easier than working)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Wonder how many woman will be writing to him asking to marry him after seeing that picture?
5 posted on
05/20/2005 9:54:38 AM PDT by
b4its2late
(It's frustrating when you know all the answers, but nobody bothers to ask you the questions.)
To: TigerLikesRooster; All
At least the underwear isn't on his head....
I DO have to ask:
WHY is he being supplied with "Just For Men"?
Let the Arab world see him as he really IS: a broken-down old despot!
6 posted on
05/20/2005 9:55:21 AM PDT by
tiamat
(Can't sleep...clowns will get me..can't sleep...clowns will get me...can't sleep....clowns will get)
To: TigerLikesRooster
8 posted on
05/20/2005 9:56:09 AM PDT by
kevkrom
("Those who stand for nothing fall for anything." -- Alexander Hamilton)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Saddam in his underwear!
I guess that justifies World War III.
News at 6.
11 posted on
05/20/2005 9:57:18 AM PDT by
MikeHu
To: TigerLikesRooster
Here's hoping the future will find Saddam as well hung as he appears in this picture.
12 posted on
05/20/2005 9:58:32 AM PDT by
Mr Ramsbotham
(Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
I sure hope the source of this picture is sniffed out....and SOON!
No doubt it's another disgruntled Clinton holdover in the Pentagon.
To: TigerLikesRooster
16 posted on
05/20/2005 10:05:20 AM PDT by
OXENinFLA
("And that [Atomic] bomb is a filibuster" ~~~ Sen. Lieberman 1-4-95)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Did we learn from Abu Graib that the "most humiliating thing" you could do to a Muslim was to show them in their underwear? Or was it flush the Koran in their presence? Or was it taking orders from a woman? I forget.
Sort of like how the press tells us that the "most humiliating thing" you can do to a black man is call him "boy"? Or was it spit in his face? Or confirm Janice Rogers Brown? I forget which because they keep changing it to fit whatever outrage is in the storyline for that week.
Bottom line, there must be hundreds of "most humiliating things" the press can make up and get a few of their lib toadies to agree with.
19 posted on
05/20/2005 10:07:43 AM PDT by
Tall_Texan
(If you can think 180-degrees apart from reality, you might be a Democrat.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
The US needs to check first with Ahmad Chalabi. I remember seeing one of his friends with a digital camera in hand when Chalabi was shown in a video as the first Iraqi to visit Saddam in prison. Check it out!! Wish I could find that video.
20 posted on
05/20/2005 10:08:37 AM PDT by
W04Man
(Bush2004 Grassroots Campaign We Did It! Now on to 2008: http://Allen4President.com)
To: TigerLikesRooster
The quality of the Sun's topless models has seriously worsened.
21 posted on
05/20/2005 10:10:22 AM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
(Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the blind obedience of fools - Solon, Lawmaker of Athens)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Helen: "God, he's a stud! I haven't been this turned on since I dated Warren Harding!"
23 posted on
05/20/2005 10:23:52 AM PDT by
reagan_fanatic
(The theory of evolution is the great cosmogenic myth of the twentieth century - Michael Denton)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Alright, which one of you picture doctoring geniuses put Saddams head on Hillary's neck???
26 posted on
05/20/2005 10:47:25 AM PDT by
F.J. Mitchell
(The House of Representatives serves people-The Senate serves Senators.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
I _really_ didn't need to see that...
To: TigerLikesRooster
Shock! Horror! Yawn! Nothing so egregious has ever been perpetrated anywhere in the world! And especially not by the media!!
30 posted on
05/20/2005 10:53:48 AM PDT by
Puddleglum
(Thank God the Boston blowhard lost)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Did you all hear the Communist news network say that these pictures could be against the Geneva Convention?
31 posted on
05/20/2005 10:55:17 AM PDT by
rambo316
To: TigerLikesRooster
Say what you want, the Guy's sporting a package that wouldn't fit under the average Christmas tree.
33 posted on
05/20/2005 11:00:06 AM PDT by
keat
(Click to hear theme song)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Ya gotta love this picture from the "Arab Street"...
They're laughing at him!
35 posted on
05/20/2005 11:31:36 AM PDT by
Redcloak
(Over 16,000 served.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
