Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is this the end of the SUV? [Canada promises to get most people into 46 mpg sub-compacts]
The Globe and Mail ^ | 5/19/05 | RICHARD GILBERT

Posted on 05/19/2005 12:57:58 PM PDT by doc30

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
Canada measures fuel mileage as how many liters of gas are needed to travel 100 kilometers. The average of 10 l/100km is about 23 mpg. Canada is mandating by 2011, 5 l/100 km, which is about 46 mpg. Owning a car in Canada is going to really, really s*ck. The sad part is that if this is the direction the auto industry is going to take there, what kind of bleed off effect will it have here in the U.S. I can't believe they want to do this by shortening the lifespan of a new car by 1/3! And they will be crappy cars, too!
1 posted on 05/19/2005 12:58:01 PM PDT by doc30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

ping?


2 posted on 05/19/2005 12:58:32 PM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30

Canada is so, so, ... European.


3 posted on 05/19/2005 1:00:06 PM PDT by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30
The sad part is that if this is the direction the auto industry is going to take there, what kind of bleed off effect will it have here in the U.S. I can't believe they want to do this by shortening the lifespan of a new car by 1/3! And they will be crappy cars, too!

You're not kidding doc. Once they're getting 40+ MPG there, it'll be hard to argue that we shouldn't do it here. Once again Canada has shown us that the shaft is just a bit longer and just a bit wider than we thought.
4 posted on 05/19/2005 1:01:35 PM PDT by Jaysun (No matter how hot she is, some man, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30

Hey! If they can manage to make a car that can fit seven people I would consider it. Wait! Wasn't that called a station wagon? If we look at the title for my SUV it says SW. Guess I already have one.


5 posted on 05/19/2005 1:02:20 PM PDT by HungarianGypsy (Walk Softly, For a Dream is Born)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30

I can't wait for Canada to break up into several pieces with the western provinces to join the US.

(Could happen.)


6 posted on 05/19/2005 1:02:29 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30

Ride you thumb? When wil government learn to leave people alone. If you wnt a large car pay for it, don't make me have to but a small car.


7 posted on 05/19/2005 1:03:40 PM PDT by handy old one (It is unbecoming for young men to utter maxims. Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: handy old one

They probably want to do this for their union paymasters. Cars with a shorter lifespan increases turnover. That means more work for unionized auto workers which means more money diverted to the Liberal junta. All in the name of 'saving the environment.' I guess 'its for the children' isn't flying like it used to up there.


8 posted on 05/19/2005 1:07:40 PM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: doc30
Me and my SUV => From my cold dead fingers. Actually, I commute in a sedan and drive the SUV the rest of the time, and if the SUV dies I will get another.
9 posted on 05/19/2005 1:07:40 PM PDT by Corporate Law (<>< -- Xavier Basketball - Perennial Slayer of #1 Ranked Teams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30

quote " the use of vans, pickup trucks and SUVs as everyday vehicles will become a thing of the past"

LOL no they wont, not as long as people still have children. The libs dont have a clue why most people drive SUV's with all the crap parents have to cart around these days for the children, there is no other option than to drive a SUV or van. By the time you fill up the back seat with car seats, and the truck with all the other misc stuff your lucky if you can even get by with a regular sized SUV!

Of course liberals don't realize this because their too busy slaughtering all their children!


10 posted on 05/19/2005 1:10:15 PM PDT by Nyboe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30

If you read til the end of the article it's clear this whole change is taking place because of Kyoto. You can see how draconian the measures will have to be to accomplish the Kyoto goals. I didn't see any mention in the growth of numbers of vehicles. They assume a static amount I believe.

Also, once they start in on the long haul trucking fleets, they'll have oversized picup trucks doing the job of 18 wheelers.

I especially like the part where they say the suburbs will die out and urban living will return AND PEOPLE WILL LIKE IT!


11 posted on 05/19/2005 1:14:45 PM PDT by Arkie2 (No, I never voted for Bill Clinton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nyboe

A local teacher here ( Neenah Wi) had a big writeup in the local paper about his "hybrid". He went so far as to call for legislation to make ownership MANDATORY. Buried in the bottom of the article was the part where he admitted he drove an SUV in the winter, because of the lousy traction of his little putt putt skate, and for SAFETY CONCERNS for his family. AMAZING.


12 posted on 05/19/2005 1:16:40 PM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: doc30

That's OK. All the people who live out in the tall and uncut will have to become self sufficiant, since you can't get a month's worth of town food in a two seater, and start subsistance farming. Since they are the farmers, the food they grow for the urbanites will dwindle away. The City dwellers, who are so proud of there little cars that can't actually survive a long road trip will linger for a while, until the cannibalism starts...


13 posted on 05/19/2005 1:17:22 PM PDT by jonascord (What is better than the wind at 6 O'Clock on the 600 yard line?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30; GMMAC; Pikamax; Former Proud Canadian; Great Dane; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; ...
Kanukistan ping.

(GMMAC and I share the list.)

:-)

14 posted on 05/19/2005 1:18:59 PM PDT by fanfan (" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2

Rules legislated by people who can't manage to have more than two children.


15 posted on 05/19/2005 1:19:16 PM PDT by TexanToTheCore (Rock the pews, Baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: doc30

Sounds great if you live in a city. I sympathize with my counterparts in the countryside, though. Wintertime, six inches of new powder, and the plows ain't comin' until Tuesday. Gimme an SUV or a great honkin' pickup with knobbly tires, thanks, and keep your 46 mpg eggshell running on fuel-efficient slicks. I don't attend a lot of tea parties and the stock need feeding.


16 posted on 05/19/2005 1:20:41 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2
The suburbs will fade, city living will become even more attractive and, given a chance, public transit will bloom.

A liberal wet dream of how "the masses" should live.

17 posted on 05/19/2005 1:22:32 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: doc30

There is pure pie in the sky stuff. There's not a chance in heck of making these targets, by any means. And any government that tries raising gas taxes high enough to force Canadians into these miserable little fuel misers will certainly be tossed out - we might put up with a lot from our morally bankrupt socialist federal government, but jacking up the level of gas taxes that high is not one of them. These guys must have been smoking really big bongs full of BC bud to have come up with this cockamamie scheme!


18 posted on 05/19/2005 1:24:44 PM PDT by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30

If I was looking to make an investment, I would be starting up an auto parts store in Canada. I got a feeling there are some SUV's up there that ain't ever going to die.


19 posted on 05/19/2005 1:24:49 PM PDT by faq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30
will these stooopid asses pass a law against SNOW too???
20 posted on 05/19/2005 1:29:40 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson